Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Join ๐Ÿ‘‰ @๐Ÿ„ฒ๐Ÿ„พ๐Ÿ……๐Ÿ„ธ๐Ÿ„ณโถโพ๐Ÿ…ƒ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ…„๐Ÿ…ƒ๐Ÿ„ท

@Covid19Truth

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

2,231subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001336224089
TypeChannel
Username@Covid19Truth
Created18 August 2020 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Covid19Truth

Growth

2,2312,2382,234.56 August 2026 โ€” 2,238 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 2,238 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 2,237 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 2,233 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 2,231 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 2,230โ€“2,239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:032,231-2
9 Aug 2026, 18:112,233-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:112,237-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:192,238no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:532,238first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 April 2023 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7h 34m
Average length
1h 53m

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘5251.0%
โค2120.6%
๐Ÿคฌ1211.8%
๐Ÿคฃ65.88%
๐Ÿ’ฏ32.94%
๐Ÿคฏ32.94%
๐Ÿ”ฅ21.96%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ21.96%
๐Ÿ‘10.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2023 to 6 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2024, 11:21 UTCโ‰ˆ1,130 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

TWO ISRAELIS OPENLY DISCUSS THEIR GENOCIDAL INTENT In this segment of the 'Two Nice Jewish Boys' podcast, the hosts Eytan Weinstein and Naor Meningher laugh as they discuss "erasing Gaza". Weinstein says to Meningher, "If there was a button to erase Gaza, I would push it in a second, right now, and I think most Israelis would." They are not even hiding their genocidal rhetoric yet this is hardly covered on MSM! Jusโ€ฆ

๐Ÿคฌ12๐Ÿ‘7โค3๐Ÿ˜ฑ2

24 Jun 2024, 01:47 UTCโ‰ˆ1,220 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ“Œ 3,276 massacres 37,000 killed (10,000 women, 15,000 children, 33 from starvation) 520 buried in mass graves 83,530 injured 17,000 became orphans 150 refugee centers bombed 2 million displaced 429 schools/universities bombed 600,000 homes destroyed 88 hospitals/clinics shut And the US cannot still find โ€œevidenceโ€ of genocide! Original Source Also statements by Israel officials showing a plan to induce famine, disโ€ฆ

โค4๐Ÿ’ฏ3

14 Oct 2023, 05:31 UTCโ‰ˆ2,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

THEORY OF POLING AND MEDIA REPORTING OVERWHELMING "NO" VOTES THEN ON THE DAY IT LOOKING THE OPPOSITE 2/2 Think about it. If enough people are discouraged from voting (from the potential no camp), and a number of dishonest "yes" voters put in multiple yes votes, the total votes will still probably be less than the number of Australian citizens. So potentially it is a way to hide the yes vote duplications. Furthermoreโ€ฆ

14 Oct 2023, 05:31 UTCโ‰ˆ1,590 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

THEORY OF POLLING AND MEDIA REPORTING OVERWHELMING "NO" VOTES THEN ON THE DAY IT LOOKING THE OPPOSITE 1/2 We are hearing of a lot of polling places having a dirth of "No" presence. This seems bizarre compared to the previous days reports of a basically assured "No" victory. Here's my theory: This, in conjunction with controlled opposition "freedom" representatives such as Bosi telling freedom groups NOT to vote atโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘2

13 Oct 2023, 10:06 UTCโ‰ˆ1,280 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

MAKE SURE YOU VOTE TOMORROW! AND VOTE "NO" (Write NO clearly and legibly on the ballot, don't tick or cross etc) Declining to vote is helping the yes vote! Shills like Bosi have tried to sabotage the NO camp. Probably quite a cheap advertising cost per person for the yes camp ๐Ÿ˜‰ There is no way the voter turnout will be less than the 70% ones like Graham have spoken of. So to not vote "NO" is a great way to help tโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘2

12 Oct 2023, 03:42 UTCviews โ€”

Join ๐Ÿ‘‰ @๐Ÿ„ฒ๐Ÿ„พ๐Ÿ……๐Ÿ„ธ๐Ÿ„ณโถโพ๐Ÿ…ƒ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ…„๐Ÿ…ƒ๐Ÿ„ท pinned ยซTHE VOICE - VOTE NO TO BOTH QUESTIONS IF YOU ARE NOT A COMMUNIST If you are in Australia, the important referendum is this weekend. A yes vote is a vote for a small group of people, notably with Communist ties, to be the "voice" for the Aboriginal people.โ€ฆยป

12 Oct 2023, 03:40 UTC751 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

TO SIDE WITH JEWS OF ISRAEL OR PALESTINIANS OF PALESTINE? This is a question which requires much nuance and true understanding of history. Most people today have neither and are easily swayed by superficial propaganda that appeals to their virtue signalling to feed their egos. This question can only be answered when considering what has transpired BEFORE the recent Hamas Qassam attacks on Israel. Those that are noโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘4โค1

11 Oct 2023, 23:46 UTC984 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

THE VOICE - VOTE NO TO BOTH QUESTIONS IF YOU ARE NOT A COMMUNIST If you are in Australia, the important referendum is this weekend. A yes vote is a vote for a small group of people, notably with Communist ties, to be the "voice" for the Aboriginal people. Most aboriginal people I have interacted with say "no" as it dilutes and even mitigates many of their personal rights as first nations people. A yes vote is not a โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘3

9 Jul 2023, 11:05 UTCโ‰ˆ1,280 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Other Big Lie of WWII: False and Ridiculous Claims by Comfort Women There have been some ridiculous stories by comfort women akin to the absurd stories told by โ€˜Holocaust survivorsโ€™. Park Yeong-Shim, a former North Korean comfort woman has claimed that: "One day Japs came and said that because we are nearly starving to death, they would treat us with beef soup," said Park. "So we ate it and they said with a bigโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘8โค1

9 Jul 2023, 10:14 UTC959 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Other Big Lie of WWII: Japanโ€™s Comfort Women Issue (Part 3) This is part 3 of 3. Click here for part 2. We will now take a look at one of the most recognised former comfort women, Yong-soo Lee who is treated like a national hero in South Korea. What was her testimony? In 1992, she talked about how she became a comfort woman: โ€œI was 16. I had no clothes, no food. Then someone gave me a dress and a pair of shoeโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘7โค1๐Ÿ‘1

1 Jul 2023, 09:39 UTC957 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Other Big Lie of WWII: Japanโ€™s Comfort Women Issue (Part 2) This is part 2 of 3. Click here for part 1. In the previous part, mention of Professor John Mark Ramseyer was made who helped shine a light on the truth of Japan in WWII by making sources available in English for the world. Professor Ramseyer has claimed that there is a certain North Korean element to the comfort women narrative. There were calls for hโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘4โค3

8 Jun 2023, 08:41 UTCโ‰ˆ1,100 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Humour: Learn how a special rock protects you from Covid-19 ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽŠ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ (C19T Original) To learn truths of Covid go to @Covid19Truth channel and subscribe To discuss these truths and deeper truths with a critical thinking that speaks to facts and evidence and doesn't take unsubstantiated BS from "believers" of any cult or belief system as "truth", but rather sees truth as that which is evident from sufficient context โ€ฆ

๐Ÿคฃ6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Covid19Truth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 322,671 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œJoin ๐Ÿ‘‰ @๐Ÿ„ฒ๐Ÿ„พ๐Ÿ……๐Ÿ„ธ๐Ÿ„ณโถโพ๐Ÿ…ƒ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ…„๐Ÿ…ƒ๐Ÿ„ทโ€ (@Covid19Truth), 2,231 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Covid19Truth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.