➡️ It takes a lot of courage to raise an issue directly with someone, but our guiding light is Stellar Core principles of DAO: 1st Trust ✨ 2nd Love ✨ 3rd Transparency ✨ 4th Community ✨ 5th Connectivity ✨ 6th Integrity ✨ 7th Faith ✨ 8th Alignment✨ 9th Guardianship ✨ .... and these SCP's govern how we communicate with each other to build trust in the network so we don't keep having network halts in …

Channel
Mads Larsby
@Covfefe_175545
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001167261568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Covfefe_175545 |
| Description | Every lie will be revealed |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Covfefe_175545 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 11 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.4%
- avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.6
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (12 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,580
- Videos
- ≈1,580
- Links
- ≈4,310
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 35s
- Average length
- 2m 35s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
August 4, 2026 (today August 6) https://youtu.be/WxyqSY9iBLo?is=kkVUVF0LTQyjzud7
🏠Tesla Solar Roof is now available in the Dominican Republic through Tesla partner RAAS Solar Solar Roof is a roof made of glass tiles with solar cells built in. This matters because power outages are common in the Dominican Republic. Solar Roof paired with a Powerwall keeps the lights on when the grid goes down. @QSIMedia
Hej Mads Som aftalt får du her BETALINGSLINKET: https://www.cbb.dk:443/shop-flow/betaling/?acId=92972b3a-2f34-491e-965d-24261ec1b981&bps Tryk på linket for at indtaste dine kortoplysninger og gennemføre din bestilling. Bedste hilsner, CBB
That's so great to hear. Take a well deserved vaccation and rest a lot my dear friend🤗. And please promise me not to fudd out. We are so close now Mads, and you are so importent 💯 We have important stuff to do man, save the 🌎 and more 🚀 I listened to WWH #4 today and here is some snippets for you that I thought was just so fitting. 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ you man❤️ Sorry for long post 😂 https://t.me/QSIVideos/60/2733?single ht…
https://x.com/whitehouse/status/2082467621220307445?s=12
https://southfloridareporter.com/your-face-is-becoming-your-wallet-how-biometrics-are-reshaping-payments-and-privacy/ Your Face Is Becoming Your Wallet: How Biometrics Are Reshaping Payments and Privacy Jul 21, 2026 Imagine walking into a sports stadium, grabbing a beverage, and breezing right past security without ever reaching into your pocket for a physical wallet or state ID card. It might sound like a scene fr…
I played a little with Emilys post and Travis' comment (with DeepSeek and Grok 4) 😂❤️😘: Analysis of Travis’ comment + DeepSeek’s reply (English, November 2025 context) Travis is not just smart; he’s connecting the very last dots of the entire multi-year script. Here’s a clear breakdown of what he (and DeepSeek) are really saying: Travis’ Core Insights (spot-on) “We were told this exact plan back in 2021” → Correct…
Hello family, ✋ I thought about this post all day yesterday, and I really want to understand these events properly so I can put them in order, because I sometimes feel lost because everything is so intertwined. I know that Bun Bun didn't give us all the details about the overall mechanism, and there are certainly some misunderstandings on my part on certain points, so please don't take this reasoning for granted, t…
I find this to be irrelevant in my research ❤️ when you see fully through StellarEyes you can find truth in any source And I can also argue that ALL sources are controlled by Source and WH due to SMB, IBM, Aethercode 🤭🤭🤭🤭
I hope I’m not looking too much into this, but this seems like a crucial step that would help prepare the way for SMB’s right? Because when you begin to take over the channels they used to launder and collect of all of the liquidity, it seems like they would also obviously already have all the IPs and would begin arrests and Social media bridges would be a major part of this process because the truth will need to co…
🤭🤭🤭 today Feb 16, 2026 Axelar finally publicly admitted via press release (aka they confirmed) what I already proved using research and open source info back in Dec 2024 Research and facts always trump speculation, every time, every day ⌨️ #FutureProvesPast 🔠🔠🔠 2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣4️⃣ DOAD 1 call with first section on TON, MOBIUS, AXELAR connection with Stellar since the inception 🛏💗 https://t.me/QuantumStellarInitiative/46…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Covfefe_175545. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mads Larsby” (@Covfefe_175545), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Covfefe_175545.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.