Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 80 days, net +633. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,158–7,216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 08:05
7,094
+112
23 Oct 2026, 10:17
6,982
+103
20 Oct 2026, 07:49
6,879
+29
17 Oct 2026, 08:49
6,850
-30
14 Oct 2026, 17:49
6,880
-24
11 Oct 2026, 03:57
6,904
+172
5 Oct 2026, 08:19
6,732
+154
26 Sept 2026, 21:17
6,578
-67
15 Sept 2026, 17:38
6,645
-41
12 Sept 2026, 08:41
6,686
-46
8 Sept 2026, 09:40
6,732
+345
2 Sept 2026, 23:35
6,387
+104
31 Aug 2026, 04:43
6,283
-7
28 Aug 2026, 05:47
6,290
+10
24 Aug 2026, 20:37
6,280
-32
21 Aug 2026, 04:14
6,312
-31
17 Aug 2026, 21:33
6,343
-26
15 Aug 2026, 02:35
6,369
-36
11 Aug 2026, 15:56
6,405
-41
8 Aug 2026, 10:55
6,446
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 43 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 39s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,982 reactions across 43 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,405
48.3%
❤🔥
807
16.2%
🥰
263
5.28%
🔥
247
4.96%
custom 5195417905549824502
230
4.62%
custom 5269501354056912093
222
4.46%
custom 5339160122960680610
172
3.45%
💋
167
3.35%
custom 5271932932611670441
128
2.57%
custom 5280931039420645744
79
1.59%
😁
68
1.36%
custom 5294444939269148697
55
1.10%
💘
50
1.00%
🍓
42
0.843%
custom 5269409055209718598
18
0.361%
😭
13
0.261%
🦄
12
0.241%
custom 5215236486676371952
3
0.06%
😎
1
0.02%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,982 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 43 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CottageHeatedRivalry. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✦ CONNOR STORRIE
British Vogue обратили внимание на тренд на футболки с потёртостями и дырками — и среди знаменитостей, которые его подхватили, оказался Коннор Сторри.
Издание отдельно отметило его образ с футболкой, покрытой той самой «паутиной» дыр, которую он снова носил на этой неделе.
А ещё Vogue вспомнили слова Коннора с Met Gala 2026:
«До недавнего времени у меня было всего пять образов в течение трёх лет.…
✦ HUDSON WILLIAMS
Немного архивных фотографий Хадсона Уильямса с Whistler Film Festival, который проходил в декабре 2024 года.
Почему мы видим их только сейчас — отдельный вопрос, но лишними точно не будут. 👀
📱Источник: John Looy & Oisin McHugh, via WhisFilmFest
@CottageHeatedRivalry
✦ HEATED RIVALRY
Немного BTS со съёмок первого сезона. Вроде бы уже столько времени прошло, а всё равно ощущение, будто это было совсем недавно.
📱Источник: @Shami1412
@CottageHeatedRivalry
✦ CONNOR STORRIE
Connor Storrie в Париже — подарок, который продолжает радовать.
Новые крупные кадры с Коннором во время встречи с фанатами.
📱Источник: foto.France on Threads
#ConnorStorrie
@CottageHeatedRivalry
✦ CONNOR STORRIE
Коннор Сторри стал главным Celebrity Voice Tiffany & Co. на Met Gala 2026
На Met Gala 2026 ювелирный бренд Tiffany & Co. занял первое место среди всех jewelry-брендов, набрав $12,9 млн Media Impact Value (MIV).
А главным Celebrity Voice бренда стал именно Connor Storrie — его появление принесло Tiffany & Co. впечатляющие $3,6 млн MIV.
📱Источник: Launchmetrics
@CottageHeatedRivalry
✦ HEATED RIVALRY | SEASON 2
Джастис Смит, уже встретил своих новых фанатов на улицах Торонто !!
Он такой милый !😍
Источник: editedbyzi/Tiktok
@CottageHeatedRivalry
#HeatedRivalry
✦ ЕЩЕ ДВЕ ВСЕЛЕННЫЕ СХЛОПНУЛИСЬ
Fournine сравнили знаменитостей с их современными «двойниками», и некоторые пары действительно заставляют зависнуть на пару секунд.
Патрик Суэйзи и Коннор Сторри — ну тут сходство особенно заметно.
А Киану Ривз и Хадсон Уильямс…
📱 Источник: fournine / X
@CottageHeatedRivalry
✦ CONNOR STORRIE
Архивное видео Коннора со съёмки для XiOX Magazine ещё в 2023 году.
📱Источник: arendjackson on TikTok
@CottegeHeatedRivalry
#ConnorStorrie #XiOXMagazine
✦ Творчество наших подписчиков
Нам прислали невероятно милую вышивку по «Heated Rivalry»! 🥹
Спасибо большое за такую красоту и за то, что делитесь с нами своим творчеством — @tyssk_krg
Если вы тоже что-то создаёте по «Heated Rivalry» — присылайте нам, будем рады показать ваши работы!
@CottageHeatedRivalry
#HeatedRivalry #ТворчествоПодписчиков
✦ CONNOR STORRIE
Эти снимки были сделаны ещё в июне, но до нас добрались только сейчас. 😍
📱 Источник: rivalryarchives on Threads
@CottageHeatedRivalry
#ConnorStorrie #HeatedRivalry
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @CottageHeatedRivalry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@CottageHeatedRivalry edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cottage Heated Rivalry/Жаркое соперничество/ Heated Rivalry” (@CottageHeatedRivalry), 7,094 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CottageHeatedRivalry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.