Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CosmoFox News Broadcast

Channel

CosmoFox News Broadcast

@CosmoFoxBroadcast

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

35,152subscribers

-2,689 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002652150417
TypeChannel
Username@CosmoFoxBroadcast
DescriptionBroadcast from CosmoFox HQ 🛰 Join now! https://t.me/cosmofox_bot/?start=ad110004 Official site - https://cosmofox.io/ Global Chat - https://t.me/ZyloEcosystem YouTube ‐ https://www.youtube.com/@CosmoFoxGame
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CosmoFoxBroadcast

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

35,15237,84136,496.56 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -2,689. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,749–38,244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:0635,152-26
9 Nov 2026, 12:3835,178-44
8 Nov 2026, 07:2035,222-28
7 Nov 2026, 01:4535,250-14
6 Nov 2026, 03:2035,264-12
5 Nov 2026, 05:1635,276-18
4 Nov 2026, 07:1135,294-19
3 Nov 2026, 04:2835,313-20
2 Nov 2026, 03:2935,333-462
1 Nov 2026, 06:4135,795-21
31 Oct 2026, 08:4035,816-287
30 Oct 2026, 06:1836,103-20
29 Oct 2026, 08:0636,123-31
28 Oct 2026, 08:0536,154-20
27 Oct 2026, 08:2536,174-12
26 Oct 2026, 11:3636,186-10
25 Oct 2026, 10:0536,196-19
24 Oct 2026, 10:1536,215-10
23 Oct 2026, 11:4436,225-18
22 Oct 2026, 11:3936,243first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.78%
avg views ÷ 35,152 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held47 (23 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total13,440
Reactions total470
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
66
Videos
147
Links
108

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 30s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,821 reactions across 47 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,28147.3%
🔥1,28826.7%
👍71914.9%
🎉1843.82%
👏831.72%
❤‍🔥801.66%
✍300.622%
🥰260.539%
🏆240.498%
🫡170.353%
😁140.29%
☃120.249%
💯80.166%
😍80.166%
🤝80.166%
⚡50.104%
🆒50.104%
🙏50.104%
👌40.083%
🗿40.083%
7 further kinds160.332%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,821 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,250 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Remember about the next game? 💥 It’s been a while since the first mention, and things have been moving behind the scenes 👀 ✍️ Concepts are taking shape. There’s still work to do, but the idea is getting clearer with every step. More to come 🚀 Soon.

❤9🔥9🫡2🎉1👍1👏1

31 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,880 views76 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👏16❤13🎉12🥰11🔥9👍7😁6🍾2

29 Oct 2026, 09:23 UTC≈2,040 views68 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

👻 Show us the scariest planet in the CosmoFox universe ✏️ Paper drawing, quick doodle, AI image, or a masterpiece made with help from your younger brother or sister. Any format works. 📖 Planet name and scary detail are welcome, but optional. Image itself is enough to participate. 👾 Titan Box Prizes: 🏆 1st place: 10 🥈 2nd place: 5 🥉 3rd place: 5 ⚠️ Send your work in this thread with #Foxloween. Open until 23:59 UT…

❤28🎉21🔥8👍7✍4

28 Oct 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,850 views54 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥16❤‍🔥11🎉10❤6🙏5🗿3👍1🤝1

26 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,620 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Beat your best 🦊 If you finished your last run thinking “I could do better” don’t leave it there. In Mining Mode, better mini-game performance can mean more $ZYLO from your 👾 Mining Drone. That moment you mistimed could be the one you nail next time. Your last result is the challenge. See if you can top it. ⛏️ Play now

❤‍🔥17🔥14👏7❤4👍3

22 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,420 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

👨‍👦‍👦 Every fox needs a crew CosmoFox wouldn’t have half these stories without his friends. Got someone who’d fit right in? Share the CosmoFox with your friends and get them into Mining Mode ⛏ Play, mine 💎 $ZYLO, and see how your runs compare. A good result feels even better when there’s someone to celebrate it with. 🅰️ Boost CosmoFox

🔥20❤10👍9🤝5🤩4

14 Oct 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,530 views74 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👾 Mini-games aren’t just breaks in a mining run How well you play them affects the drone’s $ZYLO return. A perfect performance through the mini-games gives that drone its best result 🤩 The loop stays simple: tap to drill, then focus when each mini-game arrives ⛏️ 💎 Mine $ZYLO

🔥46❤22🫡4👍1🤝1

13 Oct 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,850 views82 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ZyloEcosystemPhoto

$ZYLO is live on BingX 💚 You can now buy and trade 💎 ZYLO/USDT on BingX Spot—another option for our community. Check the official listing announcement. 🥰 Trade $ZYLO on BingX

🔥36❤31👍8🎉3❤‍🔥2🥰2

7 Oct 2026, 10:11 UTC≈2,150 views75 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Three Miners. One Big Result. Three standout in-game earnings results from CosmoFox: 🥇 35,053 $ZYLO 🥈 32,817 $ZYLO 🥉 31,015 $ZYLO That’s almost 99k $ZYLO combined across these three miners. Congrats to the pilots behind them — and thanks to everyone bringing their own energy to the game. 💎 Mine $ZYLO Every player’s journey looks different, and there’s always another chapter ahead 🦊 🅰️ Boost CosmoFox

❤39👍21🔥11⚡2🤝1🫡1

2 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,830 views66 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Some ideas fit on a page. Others need new place to play 🦊 👉 That’s where our next game begins. We’re building a whole new corner of the CosmoFox universe, and it’s taking shape now. More to come — we’ll share the next glimpse when it’s ready ✨ 🅰️ Boost CosmoFox

👍24❤22🔥20

29 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,060 views88 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🏁 CosmoFox Creator Tournament is officially over! Huge congratulations to airdropcloudJP, our winning team, with 85,152 $ZYLO mined! And respect to every team that took part. Final team standings: 🥇 airdropcloudJP — 85,152 $ZYLO 🥈 uangdroid28 — 3,660 $ZYLO 🥉 AIRDROPSATSETT — 1,676 $ZYLO There are two reward categories: 🏆 Winning team: 5 Gambling Addict Lootboxes for every player. They’ve already started arriving i…

👍32🔥26❤14👏10🎉5🗿1

28 Sept 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,250 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Curious what CosmoFox pilots are achieving? 🦊 Three featured miners show 64,683 $ZYLO in withdrawals. Their average displayed efficiency is 84%. Now imagine a clean 100% run. What could that look like? 💰 Think you can beat those stats? ⛏️ Start your own run in CosmoFox and see how your own numbers stack up. 🅰️ Boost CosmoFox

🔥24❤9👍2🥰1🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @CosmoFoxBroadcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CosmoFoxBroadcast edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 September 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CosmoFox News Broadcast” (@CosmoFoxBroadcast), 35,152 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CosmoFoxBroadcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.