Channel
@CopywritersDesk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,034subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001222687879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CopywritersDesk |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CopywritersDesk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 3,034 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 3,040 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 3,041 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 3,041 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
128 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 47.7% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 18.0% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2024 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CopywritersDesk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 September 2024 to 1 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Dear friends across our vibrant community 🌎 Wishing you all a joyful, peaceful, and inspiring New Year! 🎉🍾 As we step into 2026, let’s take a moment to celebrate the incredible journey we’ve shared. Over the years, our network of channels and groups has blossomed into a beautiful tapestry of voices, ideas, creativity, and connection. Whether through poetry, conversations, knowledge-sharing, or simple moments of lau…
❤5🔥4
🔥 Advanced #Copywriting Tip Weaponize the “Commitment & Consistency” Bias If your reader has already agreed with you once, they’re psychologically wired to keep agreeing. This is the Commitment & Consistency Bias—a cognitive shortcut that elite copywriters exploit masterfully. Here’s how to use it in your funnel or long-form copy: 🔗 Step 1: Start with a Micro-Yes Open with a statement they already believe. "You’r…
🔥9❤6
What have I been doing on telegram? ✔️ https://t.me/t_ink/170
👍1💯1
✨ Pro #Copywriting #Tip: Focus on Benefits, Not Just Features People don’t buy products—they buy what those products do for them. Features tell, but benefits sell. 📌 Example Let’s say you’re writing copy for a noise-canceling headphone. Feature-focused copy: “Our headphones come with advanced noise-canceling technology and 40mm drivers.” Benefit-driven copy: “Block out distractions and dive into pure sound—whethe…
❤7💯1
👋 Hello! Thanks for adding me to this channel. I'll now start monitoring and collecting posts from this channel and sharing them on the network stream. You can view the stream at https://tgwiz.com/stream
🧠 Top 10 Brand Design Agencies with Stunning Websites 🌍💻 Looking for branding inspiration or scouting top-tier design talent? Here's a curated list of world-class brand design agencies known not just for their work—but also for their exceptional website design: 🎨 Pentagram Minimal, typographic, editorial perfection. 🔥 Collins Bold storytelling, immersive UX, striking visuals. 🌍 Mucho Human-centered design, clean …
❤4
🧃 How to Write Copy That Slaps (Gen Z Edition) 1. Stalk your audience 👀 Check their feed, learn their lingo, know their vibe. You’re not writing for boomers. 2. Start spicy 🌶 Your first line should slap like a hot take on TikTok. 3. Keep it dumb clear 🧼 Clever is cute. Clear sells. 4. Pain points > features 💔 Talk about the struggle, not the specs. 5. CTA that hits 💅 Tell ’em what to do and why it’s 🔥. — 💡 Cop…
❤2
These Would you rather.. questions are just crazy! Would never have thought such wild ideas! 😃 Theme: #party ❔Question: Would you rather wake up after a wild party naked in the middle of the city or handcuffed to a stranger in a mysterious location with no memory of how you got there? Mode: nsfw, @WyrQuiz #WyrQuiz #WouldYouRather @WyrQuiz
✨🔥 Fragment Username Drop — These Handles SLAP! 🔥 ✨ 🖼 NFTs? 🪙TON? 📇 Bots? ↗️ Bidding? These are the usernames that’ll turn heads and own niches. 🚀 Premium Telegram Handles Up for Sale 😀 @BidBuyr – Buy. Bid. Brand. For NFT storefronts, auction bots & crypto resellers. 🪙 Offer Price: 5,000 TON 📈 @BidCoinr – Token drops meet fire bids. Crypto auctions, launchpads, or flex-worthy dashboards. 🪙 Offer Price: 5,000 TON…
❤2
💋 Tongue-tied? We’ve got prompts to loosen lips. ✍️ Got a secret story? Slide it in. We’ll let the world read it. 🔥 Want inspiration that hits like a slow touch on bare skin? Welcome! Read & Write @EroticaXp
“The more I want to get something done, the less I call it work. — Richard Bach” Powered by @BooksThiefBot | 🔥@tgWiz
Hire a freelancing expert @GigsGro and get your job done. Register now @GigsGroBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CopywritersDesk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 679,265 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Copywriter's Desk [#tips]” (@CopywritersDesk), 3,034 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CopywritersDesk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.