Вайбкодеры на месте?
🌚3👨💻1

Channel
@ConvyrTech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
476subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002206680111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ConvyrTech |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ConvyrTech |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:48 | 476 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 479 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 485 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 489 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 492 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:40 | 492 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 493 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2025 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ConvyrTech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2025 to 1 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вайбкодеры на месте?
🌚3👨💻1
Это сообщение не поддерживается в вашей версии Telegram. Пожалуйста, установите государственный мессенджер MAX
Бля я тут встретил лучшего продавца евер, как бы захантить
😭4💘1
Учитывая что они убили производство нахер как они за три года его восстановить хотят и на поток поставить процов? А если серьезно пора нахуй свое оптоволокно походу через забор кидать или врезаться к депутатам вхах Чебурнет в России достроят к 2028 году В стране будет создана автономная инфраструктура, которую можно полностью отключить от глобального интернета, рассказали в Российской ассоциации электронных коммун…
😁1
С новой годой пацаны
🤝5
Здарова миллионеры! Подгон как раз для тех кого как и меня не устраивает нестабильность амнезии и хочется хорошей скорости и стабильности платного "обхода" вот небольшой гайдик где что брать -https://teletype.in/@retrowaiver/VPiWRtsai4e Если соберем реакций на посте - сделаю софт для автоматизации абуза этих впнов с обходом капчи.
🔥3
Video, posted without a caption
😁4❤1
Гугл изменили квоты в антигравити Кратко: Раньше действовали 5 часовые лимиты на использование конкретного семейства агентов ( гугл или клауди) В чем проблема : Раньше ты мог поработать пару часов с гемини и выбив лимит перейти на клауди и поработать еще пару часов с ним. И тебе оставалось подождать часик +- до отката гемини. Сейчас выбив лимиты условно за день , два каждой нейронки придется ждать ДНЕЙ 5 ! Как …
Опачки, в Антигравити появился ОПУС Раз SONNET у нас отупел после выхода опуса, сейчас это лучшее что можно использовать для разработки дизайна веба. На счет его работы с бекендом и дебагом пока не знаю, но соннет был заметно ХУЖЕ gemini3. Пойду проведу небольшой сравнительный тест игры одного промпта между ОПУС и ГЕМИНИ
На счет конкретно разработки веба в профильных инструментах ( глава 2) : Lovable / Bolt.new / v0.dev и прочий шлак Честно я пытался в них что то сделать но как по мне абсолютно бесполезная шляпа которую не имеет смысла ПОКУПАТЬ. Генерят шаблонную очень слабую шляпу, может быть для saas сервисов сойдет и то вряд ли. Единственное приминение которое я нашел - накидать концептов в фри версии но честно проще на беханс …
Как оно кодить нейронками сейчас на личном опыте. Глава 1 - IDE : ❌ Cursor, Warp, Windsurf идут нахуй. Либо душат лимитами, либо танцы с бубном ради триала, либо просят конских денег за токены. Так же постоянные махинации со списыванием токенов. Топтание на месте и проеб времени. Все в разной степени болеют манией величия и синдромом монополиста - особенно курсор. Из них Windsurf только более менее адекватный как …
❤2👎1
Кодер ушел из проектов - пришлось самому стать "кодером"😁 Как я месяц пытался стать сам себе программистом а стал "Вайбиком" Я НИХУЯ не смыслю в коде. Мой уровень: «ну, там вроде html какой-то есть\ hello world» хотя имеется диплом программиста из плешки😂😂😂 Взял заказ на сайт для художницы с мыслью: «Ща закину нейронке воркфлоу из Фигмы, она за полчаса всё соберет, я гений, деньги в кармане».💰 Ага, щас. Я полу…
❤2🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ConvyrTech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Convyr.tech” (@ConvyrTech), 476 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConvyrTech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.