وهاذي ايش هي وايش من نوع؟ وركزو على حركة الجنين داخلها وركزو شوفو هل العينة براز او بول
❤2🔥2
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐

Channel
@Controllabo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
117subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003831955452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Controllabo |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Controllabo |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 4 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:45 | 117 | -1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 118 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 117 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 114 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 114 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
79 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 55.7% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 27.8% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 6.33% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وهاذي ايش هي وايش من نوع؟ وركزو على حركة الجنين داخلها وركزو شوفو هل العينة براز او بول
❤2🔥2
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
هاذي جارديا ...الطور Trophozite شوفو كم في تعتبر اصابه حادة وأيضاً قدكم عارفين كيف نميزها من خلال الحركة تكون دائرية بالاصح مغزلية حول نفسها
❤4
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
باقي مزارع بكتيريا وفطريات وأيضاً تحت المجهر وايش الاوساط الخاصه للفطريات وايش الخاصه للبكتيريا وكل وسط ايش الفرق بينهن ان شاء الله اكملها الاسبوع القادم الان مزنوق معانا امتحانين الاسبوع القادم
👍2
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
هاذي العينة كانت لطفل عمره حوالي 7 سنوات غالباً بتلاحظ H.nana منتشرة عند الاطفال اكثر من البالغين
👍2❤1
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
H.nana
👍2❤1
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
صوره مقربه بتلاحظ وجود بداخلها جنين يحتوي على 4 خطافات مميزات بيضة H. nana تفهما بعقلك بهذه الطريقة: اولاً الشكل: مستديرة أو بيضاوية. ثانياً الغلاف: لها غشاء خارجي واضح. داخلها يوجد غشاء داخلي. ثالثاً أهم علامة ⭐ بين الغشاء الداخلي والخارجي توجد خيوط قطبية (Polar filaments) الموجودة في طرفي الغشاء الداخلي يعني بتشوف خيوط بالطرف العلوي والسفلي للبيضه بداخل الغشاء بس الصورة هنا ليش مقربه زياده ما بتشوفها لاكن وانت تد…
❤5
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
H.nana اسأل نفسك سؤال وانت تشوفها الان كيف عرفت انها H.nana ايش التميزات حقها بتلاحظ انه هاذي ثاني والذي كنت تشوفها بالملزمة ثاني لانك معتمد على اشكال الصور وليس الصفات التميزية وبرسل لكم صورة واضحه قربتها بحيث تقدر تشوف حقها الصفات
👍4❤1
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
طبعاً اول ما اخذت العينه اشتغلتها بطريقة Direct شفت بويضه و RBC كثير بس ما عرفت احدد البويضه هاذي حق اي دودة او باراسايت لذلك اكثرنا والكل خاصه الذي عادهم يدرسو اكثر البويضات واحتمال الكل مارح تميزها والله ابداً وانت عاده ما قد طبقت او حتى قدك مستوى رابع وما طبقت او ما ركزت على التفاصيل احنا كنا ندرس ونذاكر وندرخ ويجي وقت الاختبار ننزل المعلومات ولو يجي بعد شهر تشوف عينه قد نسيت حق اي دودة هاذي. لذلك ضروري السمه الاس…
❤4
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
H.nana
❤4
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
الفرق انه هاذي الطريقه indirect تكون افضل وادق لانه تفصل لك جميع الطبقات الذي بالعينة واذا في دهون او غيره تفككها وايضاً بيوض الديدان تترسب بالراسب وتشوفها بشكل اوضح وادق ان وجدت.
❤1
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
الطريقة الثانية/ indirect اولاً تأخذ انبوبه نظيفة وثم تأخذ قليل من البراز نفس الكمية بالطريقة المباشرة ثم تضيف من ٢ الى ٤ مل من محلول الفورمالين ..وتسنترها لمده دقيقتين الى ٣ بتشوف راسب اسفل العينه انت بتأخذ الانبوبة وتسكبها رح يتبقي لك الراسب الذي اسفل الانبوبه ثم تفرغها لفوق شريحة وترجع تشوفها تحت المجهر.
❤4
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
اولا كيفية طرق فحص البراز تحت المجهر الطريقة الأولى/ Direct تأخذ مسحه صغيرة من البراز وبشرط المسحه يجب ان تأخذها من اكثر من مكان من العينة ...ثم تحطها على شريحه نظيفه وتضيف من قطرة الى قطرتين من محلول ملحي عادةً يكون normal saline ثم ترجع تفردها على الشريحه كامل بحيث تكون الرؤيه اوضح واسهل ومن أجل تجنب التكدسات والتراكمات الذي رح تجعل من الصعب انك تشوف اذا كان في بيوض الديدان او اي شيء...ثم تحطها تحت المجهر بالعدسه …
❤4👍1
Signed ℤ𝕀𝔸𝔻 𝔸𝕃𝔸𝕄𝔼ℝ𝕐
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Controllabo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“التشخيص وضبط الجودة في طب المختبرات” (@Controllabo), 117 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Controllabo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.