Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Constitution Education PMA

@ConstitutionEducation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,104subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001688162450
TypeChannel
Username@ConstitutionEducation
Created2 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConstitutionEducation

Growth

2,1012,1042,102.56 August 2026 — 2,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,101 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,104 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,101–2,104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:132,104+3
6 Aug 2026, 22:312,101-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:222,102no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:032,102first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 2,104 subscribers
Avg views / post
432
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,727
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32m 34s
Average length
16m 17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7543.9%
🔥2212.9%
👍2112.3%
❤‍🔥169.36%
158.77%
🏆74.09%
🐳42.34%
👀42.34%
💯31.75%
🙏21.17%
🥰21.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC258 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

10🔥5👍32

31 Jul 2026, 23:25 UTC269 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hey all! Could I ask you a favor? I changed up the sign up page for private classes so it might be less cluttered. Would some of you be able to take a look and tell me if its user friendly for you? its on www.constitutioneducationpma.com/upcoming-classes. you will need to agree to the members agreement before seeing the page.

2

23 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC778 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

This Monday night at 8 PM ET, we are going to continue a topic, that I had covered a year ago, I had titled the class "liberty on the roads", but we know that challenges to our liberty are not limited to the travelling on the roads. This week we will be chatting about Liberty in everyday life. He who fails to assert his rights have none.... and yet we have been talking about living peacefully, where do those two id

🔥53

15 Jul 2026, 02:36 UTC422 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CaptKylePatriotsVideo

🚨MUST WATCH: SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT TAKES PRIMETIME TO THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT'S SECRET VAULT 💰🚪🔥 @JesseBWatters 🔗 💥POTUS’s signature on your dollar bill 😃 and his face on a coin ♥️ @CaptKylePatriots

6👀2👍2

13 Jul 2026, 23:01 UTC416 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⏰ We begin in one hour! Tonight we'll be sharing Liberty in Everyday Life together. This isn't a class about learning another process or another document. It's an invitation to step back and ask: What kind of life is all of this meant to produce? If you've ever found yourself thinking, "Just one more class..." "Just one more document..." "Then I'll slow down..." ...I think you'll enjoy tonight's conversation. 🕗 We

2

12 Jul 2026, 00:45 UTC344 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

For your entertainment. Loper Bright is continuing to re-align the system. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXr9yXJiu1L/?igsh=N3I2MmJmeTJhOW10

5

10 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC377 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🍎 A little thought before the weekend... One of the ideas we'll be exploring Monday evening is this: Most of us prepare for the rare moments. The traffic stop. The government office. The unexpected letter. And there is wisdom in being prepared. But what if we've become so focused on preparing for the exceptions that we've forgotten to enjoy the ordinary days? That's the conversation. Not less preparation... Just rem

❤‍🔥114🔥3

8 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌿 This Monday's class has been sitting with me all week. Can I ask you something? How often do you actually interact with the public system? For most of us... it's surprisingly rare. Yet sometimes those rare moments become the center of our thinking. Meanwhile, most of life is happening somewhere else. Around the dinner table. At work. With our children and grandchildren. Building. Creating. Keeping our word. Servi

4

6 Jul 2026, 23:02 UTC350 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We begin in ONE HOUR! If you've been thinking about joining us for Peacefully Powerful, there's still time. Tonight we'll explore what power really is, why peace is not weakness, and how self-governance, responsibility, and intentional living work together to create lasting influence. 🕗 Tonight at 8:00 PM Eastern 🔗 Sign Up Here: https://www.constitutioneducationpma.com/upcoming-classes 🎥 Can't make it live? No pro

👍5

5 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC357 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tomorrow evening we begin our Summer 2026 series with a class that has been on my mind for quite some time. Peacefully Powerful isn't really about becoming more powerful. It's about discovering where power has been all along. Over the past year, Constitution Education has gradually shifted from asking, "How do I defend myself?" to asking, "What am I building?" I think this conversation brings those ideas together.

8

3 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC541 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌿 A thought as I prepare for Monday... One year ago, I taught a class called Peacefully Dangerous. Looking back, I still believe much of what we talked about. But over the past year, something has shifted. We've explored trusts, trusteeship, authorship, self-governance, writing, and intentional living. As I looked back over all of those conversations, I realized they all seemed to be pointing toward the same question

7❤‍🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ConstitutionEducation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 769,226 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Constitution Education PMA” (@ConstitutionEducation), 2,104 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConstitutionEducation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.