@sfattiAmano

Channel
C๏niglietti An๏nimi
@ConigliettiAnonimi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001082564001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ConigliettiAnonimi |
| Description | La tana del Bianconiglio vi aspetta! 🐇 Leggi il regolamento ed entra nel gruppo ufficiale del network pro-creativo più bello di telegram! 🐰 @CA2net ❔ Telegra.ph/CA2-02-02 Vedi anche: 🌐 @BHSnet 😈 @FetNet |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 18 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ConigliettiAnonimi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 46 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 46 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 February 2017 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Hai mai creato un meme?
- ❌ Non mi piacciono le lasagne30%
- ✨ Credo di aver realizzato un'opera d'arte40%
- 🥶 Non faceva ridere18%
- 💼 È il mio lavoro12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Come ti piacciono le lasagne? 🍕
- Classiche, col ragù di cadavere48%
- 4 stagioni, soprattutto l'estate12%
- Verdi, spinaci e pesto14%
- Al sangue10%
- Morte16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Che fanno mille cinesi in una pressa?
- Sudano9%
- Muoiono8%
- Si riproducono6%
- Giocano a Risiko5%
- Le pagine gialle30%
- Si però questa è vecchia come mio nonno se non di più5%
- Non lo so io non sono cinese5%
- Questo è lazzismo blutto bastaldo!12%
- Che cazzo ci fanno dentro una pressa scusa?16%
- E comunque non fa ridere5%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Pisolino pomeridiano: pro o contro?
- 😴 zZ..ZzZ48%
- 🐟 Chi dorme non piglia pesci.. io il pesce lo vorrei invece pigliare, grazie27%
- 🤐 Guarda che non ho tre anni, che ti pensi? Ora non ti rispondo gnegnegné!25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Scegli una modifica sul tuo corpo:
- 👀 Zoom 10x a comando59%
- 🦴 Ossa elastiche26%
- 🍐 La terza tetta4%
- 👅 Saliva velenosa11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Vi metterete mai 🦆ordo per ottenere più del 90% di risposte uguali in un sondaggio? (È la vostra occasione)
- ❌ NO64%
- 😁 SÌ36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Preferisci subire o aggredire?
- Preferirei nessuno dei due, ma se proprio, va bene subire perché sono resiliente33%
- A me piace proprio ricevere dolore e umiliazione, grazie mille9%
- No fanculo, non sopporto ricevere maltrattamenti, piuttosto la forza la uso io35%
- Sono una cazzo di tigre: nessuno mi tocca e divoro chi voglio23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Riuscirà questo sondaggio a raggiungere in totale almeno 500 voti? 🔝
- ❌ Impossibile20%
- 😌 Possiamo provare33%
- 🦾 SFIDA ACCETTATA! Lo condivido in giro7%
- 👥 Troppo facile: ho altri 499 account12%
- 🙅🏻 NO, io non voterò28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
IL GRUPPO CHIUDE. Restate sul canale per essere aggiornati su future iniziative. Grazie e vaffanculo ❤️ baci 😘
LINK DEL GRUPPO Accedi a C๏niglietti An๏nimi Il link è pubblicato solo nel bottone sotto questo messaggio!
LA COMMUNITY Questo gruppo è un centro di scambio di idee e proposte riguardo vari temi e canali del network @CA2net Entra se hai qualcosa che vuoi condividere!!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ConigliettiAnonimi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hai mai creato un meme?
- ❌ Non mi piacciono le lasagne30%
- ✨ Credo di aver realizzato un'opera d'arte40%
- 🥶 Non faceva ridere18%
- 💼 È il mio lavoro12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Come ti piacciono le lasagne? 🍕
- Classiche, col ragù di cadavere48%
- 4 stagioni, soprattutto l'estate12%
- Verdi, spinaci e pesto14%
- Al sangue10%
- Morte16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Che fanno mille cinesi in una pressa?
- Sudano9%
- Muoiono8%
- Si riproducono6%
- Giocano a Risiko5%
- Le pagine gialle30%
- Si però questa è vecchia come mio nonno se non di più5%
- Non lo so io non sono cinese5%
- Questo è lazzismo blutto bastaldo!12%
- Che cazzo ci fanno dentro una pressa scusa?16%
- E comunque non fa ridere5%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Pisolino pomeridiano: pro o contro?
- 😴 zZ..ZzZ48%
- 🐟 Chi dorme non piglia pesci.. io il pesce lo vorrei invece pigliare, grazie27%
- 🤐 Guarda che non ho tre anni, che ti pensi? Ora non ti rispondo gnegnegné!25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Scegli una modifica sul tuo corpo:
- 👀 Zoom 10x a comando59%
- 🦴 Ossa elastiche26%
- 🍐 La terza tetta4%
- 👅 Saliva velenosa11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Vi metterete mai 🦆ordo per ottenere più del 90% di risposte uguali in un sondaggio? (È la vostra occasione)
- ❌ NO64%
- 😁 SÌ36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2017 to 23 July 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ConigliettiAnonimi named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“C๏niglietti An๏nimi” (@ConigliettiAnonimi), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConigliettiAnonimi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.