Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Confirmado Transparencia: no es magia, son tus impuestos

Channel

Confirmado Transparencia: no es magia, son tus impuestos

@ConfirmadoTransparencia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,997subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002021928829
TypeChannel
Username@ConfirmadoTransparencia
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConfirmadoTransparencia

Growth

10,99611,01111,003.57 August 2026 — 11,011 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,011 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,009 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,008 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,007 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,004 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,996 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,000 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,997 subscribers10,9977 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,994–11,013 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:0610,997-3
14 Aug 2026, 17:2711,000+4
13 Aug 2026, 10:3510,996-8
12 Aug 2026, 10:3311,004-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:5711,007-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:3311,008-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:2511,009-2
7 Aug 2026, 13:3111,011no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:0211,011first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 10,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,980
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held23 (14 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total65,520
Reactions total1,013
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,033 reactions across 23 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬36635.4%
🤮19619.0%
15615.1%
🔥858.23%
💩636.10%
🤡575.52%
👍292.81%
👏262.52%
😱121.16%
🤯121.16%
😈70.678%
🤣70.678%
🌚50.484%
😁40.387%
🍌30.29%
🥰20.194%
👎10.097%
🕊10.097%
🤷10.097%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,033reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,500 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Igualdad se gasta 58.600 euros en un viaje para hablar sobre violencia de género en la ONU La delegación estuvo formada por una decena de representantes del ministerio y varios expertos invitados https://theobjective.com/espana/politica/2026-08-13/igualdad-gasta-58600-euros-viaje-onu/ El sector público suspende en transparencia y las reclamaciones se disparan un 60% Las entidades analizadas apenas ofrecen en sus

💩18🤬12🤮7

Signed Pablo

11 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,920 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Cuatro conductores han perdido el permiso de conducir seis veces desde que se sacó el carnet por puntos https://theobjective.com/sociedad/2026-08-11/uso-cinturon-sube-positivos-alcohol-caen/

👍17😱91

Signed Pablo

10 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈2,330 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Interior lleva gastados 26,6 millones de euros en la valla de Ceuta desde 2018 En el caso de la verja de Melilla, la inversión del Gobierno en el mismo periodo ha sido de casi 34.700.00 euros https://theobjective.com/espana/2026-08-10/interior-ha-gastado-mas-26-millones-valla-ceuta-2018/ Cataluña concentró el 45% de los atracos a bancos registrados en España durante 2025 Interior contabilizó 143 robos con violen

🤮20🤬72

Signed Pablo

9 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,540 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026

La abogada del Estado que defiende a Sánchez cobró 45.000 euros de dos empresas públicas Zaida Isabel Fernández Toro se querelló contra el juez Peinado, instructor de la causa contra Begoña Gómez https://theobjective.com/espana/politica/2026-08-09/abogada-del-estado-defiende-sanchez-cobro-euros-empresas-publicas/ Cataluña concentra el 57% de los investigados por matrimonios forzados en la última década Los extra

🤮15👏122🔥2🤬2💩1

Signed Pablo

7 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈2,450 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Correos se niega a revelar dónde y cuántos votos custodió cada noche antes del 23-J La empresa pública postal alega que divulgar protocolos de custodia permitiría detectar vulnerabilidades en los comicios https://theobjective.com/espana/2026-08-07/correos-votos-custodiados-noches-23j-transparencia/

🤬44🤮12😁1

Signed Pablo

6 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,630 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Las reclamaciones ante Transparencia suben un 60% en el primer semestre, el 70% contra ministerios El organismo se queja de que sigue con la misma plantilla de 30 personas desde 2023 y que tampoco han aumentado sus recursos Leer más: https://www.europapress.es/nacional/noticia-reclamaciones-transparencia-suben-60-primer-semestre-70-contra-ministerios-20260806132642.html

25🤬6👍1

Signed Pablo

6 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈2,440 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Los detenidos por conducir sin carnet se han disparado un 34% desde 2018 La Dirección General de Tráfico registró 144.000 infracciones en 2025, cifra récord de la serie histórica https://theobjective.com/sociedad/2026-08-06/detenidos-conducir-sin-carnet-34-desde-2018/

🤬35🌚53🍌3🤷1

Signed Pablo

5 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈2,460 views52 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Patrimonio Nacional ha gastado más de 100.000 euros en cinco temporadas de vacaciones de Sánchez en la finca de Doñana Es el destino del presidente del Gobierno para sus descansos junto con La Mareta de Lanzarote. https://www.libertaddigital.com/libremercado/2026-08-05/patrimonio-nacional-ha-gastado-mas-de-100-000-euros-en-cinco-temporadas-de-vacaciones-de-sanchez-en-la-finca-de-donana-7444331/

🤮33🤬11🔥5💩2👎1

Signed Pablo

4 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,500 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Hoy tres temas y un podcast La empresa pública Hunosa lleva desde que se fundó en 1967 con números rojos: 3.070 millones en pérdidas Se trata de una sociedad participada al 100% por la SEPI dedicada a la minería en Asturias https://www.libertaddigital.com/libremercado/2026-08-04/martes-la-empresa-publica-hunosa-lleva-desde-que-se-fundo-en-1967-con-numeros-rojos-3-070-millones-en-perdidas-7444893/ La Casa Árabe au

🤮234🤬2🤯2👏1

Signed Pablo

3 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈2,350 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Cataluña concentró el 40% de las okupaciones de toda España durante 2025 La Generalitat contabilizó casi 6.000 casos de allanamiento y usurpación, más que Andalucía, Valencia y Madrid juntas https://theobjective.com/espana/2026-08-03/cataluna-40-okupaciones-toda-espana-2025/ El Gobierno oculta el gasto de la herramienta Hodio cuatro meses después de su inicio El Ministerio que dirige Elma Saiz sostiene que no cu

🤡20🤮63😈2🤬1

Signed Pablo

2 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,430 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026

La mitad de los inmigrantes que reciben el Ingreso Mínimo Vital son marroquíes El 70% de las mujeres marroquíes en edad laboral no cotizan formalmente: es una de las tasas de actividad más bajas de España https://theobjective.com/espana/politica/2026-08-02/mitad-inmigrantes-reciben-ingreso-minimo-vital-marruecos/ Las mujeres cometieron en 2025 el doble de secuestros parentales que los hombres El 66% de las sustr

🤮33🤬73🔥2💩1😈1

Signed Pablo

30 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈3,410 views41 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Una orden legal obliga a Marlaska a explicar su arbitraria gestión de los incendios El Debate accede a una nueva orden legal por la que el ministro deberá justificar por qué activa o no la emergencia nacional por tragedias similares en las que el Gobierno actúa o espera según su capricho https://www.eldebate.com/espana/20260730/orden-legal-obliga-marlaska-explicar-arbitraria-gestion-incendios_444808.html El Ayuntam

25🤬16

Signed Pablo

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ConfirmadoTransparencia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Alvise Pérez
@Alviseperez · 621,396
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Wall Street Wolverine
@wallstwolverine · 180,020
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Vito Quiles 🇪🇸
@vitoquilestelegram · 151,723
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Confirmado Transparencia: no es magia, son tus impuestos” (@ConfirmadoTransparencia), 10,997 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConfirmadoTransparencia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.