Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Confess Pal 🦉

Channel

Confess Pal 🦉

@ConfessPal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,126subscribers

-156 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002228482301
TypeChannel
Username@ConfessPal
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConfessPal

Growth

6,1266,2826,2047 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,268 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,231 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,186 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,154 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,126 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 14 days, net -156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,103–6,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 04:446,126-28
17 Aug 2026, 20:566,154-32
14 Aug 2026, 18:386,186-45
11 Aug 2026, 00:546,231-37
8 Aug 2026, 03:326,268-14
7 Aug 2026, 09:306,282no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:186,282first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.45%
avg views ÷ 6,126 subscribers
Avg views / post
334
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.636%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held49 (4 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total16,348
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1760.7%
🗿621.4%
🔥517.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC165 viewsread 12 August 2026

I think an ignorant family is better than a controlling, strict one. Whenever I see kids or teenagers with a controlling family, I feel like why r those parents want to make their kid a robot. Personally I feel blessed that my family doesn't interfere that much in my life, they just tell me the consequences of the things that I'm going to do and that helped me a lot to be far from addictions or some other kind of thi

11 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC179 viewsread 12 August 2026

hey is there anyone who can go out and explore delhi with me this Sunday? #ask

11 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC209 viewsread 12 August 2026

Is there anyone here who has knowledge or experience with Avoidant Personality Disorder? I’d appreciate any insights, information, or personal experiences you’re willing to share. #feedback

11 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC218 viewsread 12 August 2026

Does anyone of you here have any online work? I'm doing schooling rn and I have smart phone I'm need of work and moeny #ask

11 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC223 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Maybe this planet is another world's hell #secret

🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC274 viewsread 12 August 2026

I'm getting new job from Mumbai and I'm from Haryana. This job is from a start up and good company. But i don't understand should i go for it, as my mom is getting emotional and she can't go with me as my family is here. Please guide me🥹 #ask

10 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC284 viewsread 12 August 2026

Anyone has chess.com premium application or premium membership? #ask

10 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC290 viewsread 12 August 2026

You’re not here by accident. God has a purpose for your life. Even if you don’t understand it yet, keep going. Your story isn’t over. 🤍 #confess

10 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC276 viewsread 12 August 2026

Guys, I'm cooked. So, I was recently searching for online works and through instagram I got to know about some numbers...the numbers were from either my country,India or USA.... instagram redirected me to those numbers and I messaged them....they said it was online tasks...to be honest I knew they were scams and they would first let me do some tasks then give me money and after some time ask for money from me..so I

9 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC336 viewsread 12 August 2026

Okay, I’ve been wanting to say this for a while, and I know this probably isn’t the easiest thing to put in a group, but I’d rather be honest. I know I messed up with Nirav, and I’m not going to make excuses for the way I behaved. I genuinely regret hurting him and I understand why he chose to walk away. I’ve thought a lot about my actions, and I know saying sorry doesn’t automatically fix everything. But the truth

9 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC334 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Oru vattam ente kai pokkiyapol arayathe ente friend nte mula yil thatti. Ath enik haram aayi... Bike il povumbozhum, vere enthelum cheyyumbozhum okke ariyathapole thattum... But ippo enik kuttabhodham ind #sorry

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @ConfessPal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 260,198 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Confess Pal 🦉” (@ConfessPal), 6,126 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConfessPal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.