Channel
@ConeCrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
123subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002407071003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ConeCrypto |
| Description | You are not eligible |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ConeCrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 123 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 80.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 19 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2. Список проектов и вывод https://x.com/re — что за проект и что делает, расписывать не буду очень приятное комьюнити, и если будете стараться, то есть шанс получить роли (много смартов, которые контрибьютили суккинкт) конкуренция есть, и формат ИИ-постов у вас тут не прокатит https://x.com/bulktrade — клёвый проект с крутым маскотом, очень многие смарты, за кем слежу, делают по нему контент (конкуренция тоже есть)…
1. Личный опыт и наблюдения все-таки меня поглотила рутина Твиттера, и я этим доволен я даже рад, что перестроил большую часть своего времени именно на него, а ончейн-активность чуть сместил на задний план — уже видел посты, которые выкладывают большие инфлы об изменениях в своей работе)) проекты фулл сместили фокус (что доказал монад, сбрив всех тестеров) в общем, что хочу подсветить людям, у которых есть мозг и ко…
#Pi2Squared Новые таски гайд - https://docs.pi2.network/user-guides/omniset-and-omniswap/omniset-usage-guide
#Quranium кто говно индусовское это делает там легкий квиз есть https://community.quranium.org/qrnrush овтеты на квиз : 1-2 2-1 3-4 4-2 5-1 6-2 7-4 8-3 9-1 10-3
#Pi2Squared 2 новых таска - просто прокликиваются https://portal.pi2.network/quests
#Kaito Новый лаунчпад -https://yaps.kaito.ai/capital-launchpad/4543406a813c428786ba?projectName=zkPass Страт : 27 октября в 15:00 по мск Детали : Vesting Schedule 50% unlock at TGE + 50% after 3m
#Pharos Индусы добавили новые таски. Токены берём в кране на сайте -https://testnet.pharosnetwork.xyz/ Via Atlantic On-chain Address — отправляем на свой адрес (91 транзакция). Asseto — берём тестовые токены и депозитим (91 транзакция). https://testnet.asseto.finance/pharos В идеале, если делали ранее, нужно забрать 6-й уровень. ТГЕ вроде как Q1 2026
#Monad кто тыкал монадовское говно проверьте себя https://claim.apr.io/
#Pi2Squared Новые таски подвезли,создать кошлек и отправить пару транз https://portal.pi2.network/quests кошелек -https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/fastset-wallet/ghibjknldlhfffnckpencpcjbhefblbe?utm_source=item-share-cb гайдик от дева - https://docs.pi2.network/fastset-dev/fastset-wallet-extension/wallet-browser-extension-usage-guide p.s чтобы апрувнуло таски подключите новый кош в профиле
#Recall Уебище клейм дает https://claim.recall.network/
#Monad https://claim.monad.xyz/ ахзазхазхзхазахазазхазх
#NeuraProtocol: Команда и экономическая модельКоманда • CEO: Ars (@arsydefi) — экс-руководитель продаж Ankr. • CTO: Peter Stewart (@PeterAnkrNeura) — архитектор инфраструктуры Ankr/Asphere. • CPO: Tyler Sloan (@tsloan_tech) — продуктовый лидер из FinTech.Экономическая модель Модель EIP-1559: • Base Fee: корректируется, сжигается. • Priority Fee: для приоритизации. • Оплата по фактическому газу. Testnet: • Токен: Tes…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ConeCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,132,178 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@ConeCrypto named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0xCone” (@ConeCrypto), 123 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConeCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.