Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🟥 | 𝘾𝙊𝙉𝘾𝙀𝙋𝙏𝙀𝙍𝙎 𝙈𝙊𝙉𝙏𝙃 🎨

@ConceptersMonth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004434762051
TypeChannel
Username@ConceptersMonth
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConceptersMonth

Growth

1319 Aug 2026, 04:48 — 131 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:21 — 131 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:489 Aug 2026, 17:21
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:21131no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:48131first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
123.4%
avg views ÷ 131 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held12 (30 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,940
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1565.2%
💘417.4%
😍313.0%
❤‍🔥14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC125 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Все! На этом закончилось наше почти двухмесячное событие, я не планировал тянуть настолько долго, но вышло как вышло, будет ли подобного формата ещё события? Я не знаю. Все по ситуации. Давольно спонтанно у меня все рождается, и это событие не исключение, в какой-то момент я просто решил реализовать одну из своих идей событий, которую выбрала моя аудитория @shaark10, решили реализовать эту, я немного доработал и вышл

2

1 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC123 viewsread 9 August 2026

🎉 Под данным постом можете написать какое тз для вас было наилучшим из всех Список ТЗ : Казино Подводные рыцари Мыльные пузыри Цирковые игрушки Уличные Ящерицы Ковбои и НЛО День мертвых Подводные существа Лесные магические существа Кунг-фу животные Мутированные растения Театр/Гала Каменный век Инь Янь Киберспорт Водные байки Супергерои / Волшебный камень Древнегреческая мифология (огр. список) Бразильский карнавал Н

1 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC111 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Номинация «Самый проработанный концепт» : Вэнди всех мастей - @levilevofficial

1 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC110 viewsread 9 August 2026

⭐️ Номинация «Голос аудитории» - @hivko За актив в событии и активацию карт

1 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC218 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ В номинации «Братское Сражение» побеждают @kert4567 & @mirpikbrawlik и @Nrf11 & @amadisconcepts За по настоящему братское сражение

❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC106 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ В номинации «Сенсация месяца» побеждает @vitrender со скинами «Пузырь Гас» и «Подводный рыцарь Финкс» Недооцененные работы, которые заслуживают большего внимания

1 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC131 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ В номинации «лучший скин» есть сразу 3 победителя : 1) Марифауна ДжуДжу 2) Мертвый дух Лили 3) Охотник за НЛО Луми

4😍3

1 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC152 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🪎 Всего за все событие было реализовано 44 скина, было 7 автовинов, 24 ТЗ, 24 участника, 1 возрождение, было активировано 3 карты, 23 опроса.

3

31 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC370 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Победитель финала первого Concepters Month становится - @levilevofficial 🏅Он набрал 205% голосов (170 голосов) 🥈 Второе место занимает @floobic_bs с 95% голосов (79 голосов) 🥉Третьим местом награждается @muffindraw 🃏Скин-победитель месяца : Вэнди всех мастей В течение двух дней также будут посты с номинациями для других участников и подписчиков, также выберем лучшее ТЗ мероприятия и некоторые другие события.

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ConceptersMonth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,543 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🟥 | 𝘾𝙊𝙉𝘾𝙀𝙋𝙏𝙀𝙍𝙎 𝙈𝙊𝙉𝙏𝙃 🎨” (@ConceptersMonth), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConceptersMonth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.