Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Archive

Channel

The Archive

@ComClips

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,998subscribers

+11,059 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004424640203
TypeChannel
Username@ComClips
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 12 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ComClips

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

93913,2327,085.58 August 2026 — 939 subscribers8 August 2026 — 959 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,556 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,579 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,586 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,604 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,619 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,695 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,843 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,843 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,903 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,926 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,985 subscribers2 October 2026 — 13,232 subscribers7 October 2026 — 12,042 subscribers11 October 2026 — 11,998 subscribers11,9988 August 202611 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 65 days, net +11,059. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 21:1711,998-44
7 Oct 2026, 05:0212,042-1,190
2 Oct 2026, 05:5513,232+11,247
16 Sept 2026, 19:211,985+59
12 Sept 2026, 12:371,926+23
8 Sept 2026, 02:371,903+60
7 Sept 2026, 02:221,843no change
2 Sept 2026, 19:141,843+148
30 Aug 2026, 12:351,695+76
27 Aug 2026, 21:541,619+15
25 Aug 2026, 04:581,604+18
21 Aug 2026, 16:581,586+7
18 Aug 2026, 22:061,579+23
15 Aug 2026, 15:041,556+597
8 Aug 2026, 12:45959+20
8 Aug 2026, 01:34939first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 03s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

500 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭28657.2%
👎9619.2%
❤408.00%
😡244.80%
🤣234.60%
🔥112.20%
😁40.8%
🥰40.8%
🫡40.8%
👍30.6%
🎉20.4%
🤝20.4%
🤨10.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 500 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
237
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
98
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ComClips. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC813 views28 reactions2 Starsread 7 September 2026
Video

We got ishowspeed com edits Could these gentlemen be the kings of coinbase NFA? 😳 📸 @comclips | 🐧 @comsaviour

😭19❤7😁2

5 Sept 2026, 04:05 UTC899 views7 reactionsread 7 September 2026

🥚 EggyWall - High-Performance Hosting https://eggywall.org Need hosting that doesn’t fold under pressure? EggyWall delivers powerful VPS hosting & Anti-DDoS from Frankfurt, Germany 🇩🇪, backed by premium network and application-layer protection included as standard. 🧱 BulletProof - Abuse Ignored 💾 Fast NVMe SSD Storage ♾️ Unlimited Bandwidth 🛡️ Premium Anti-DDoS Included 🌐 Advanced Web Application Firewall (WAF) 🔥…

😭5❤1🤨1

3 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,320 views27 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

@/zeuski @ da club after hitting a massive lick 😳 📸 @comclips | 🐧 @comsaviour

🤣14👎10❤3

1 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,930 views11 reactions59 Starsread 7 September 2026
Video

1,800 members 🎉 📸 @comclips | 🐧 @comsaviour

😭8🎉2❤1

31 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈2,050 views5 reactionsread 7 September 2026

hi lads we also went ahead and made a channel to upload more shit post / meme content (not clips) Click here to join it :) Very unfinished, just wanted to make this post. sorry for many useless posts i will post more clips soon i promise. 💎 — @comsaviour • @disrespecting

❤4🤣1

31 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,640 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😭11❤1

30 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈3,300 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Video

@zeuski no caption 📸 @comclips | 🐧 @comsaviour

😭9🤣2

28 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC≈2,280 views22 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Hi been getting a lot of dms about ads, I’ve finally decided to set a fixed price. (rack’s competition prices) $167 / day $267 / 3 days need to feed my gambling addiction to discuss further contact @comsaviour — all prices are negotiable 💎

😭11🤣6😡5

28 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC≈2,500 views7 reactions2 Starsread 7 September 2026
Video

💎 We have obtained footage of a Twitter account takeover carried out by a threat actor known as “Menche.” 📸 @comclips | 🐧 @comsaviour

🔥4😭3

26 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,120 views18 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

Theres no limit to the larp… (i think its @kobes in the video) 📸 @comclips | 🐧 @comsaviour

👎13😭5

23 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,440 views79 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

Ai video of com member zyz (@attemptless1) beating up homeless THIS VIDEO IS MADE WITH AI FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY — DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME 📸 @comclips | 🐧 @comsaviour

👎53😡19😭7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ComClips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Archive” (@ComClips), 11,998 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ComClips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.