Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⟅ıI♟️Iı⟆

@Collection_NocturneLN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002568247021
TypeChannel
Username@Collection_NocturneLN
Created9 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Collection_NocturneLN

Growth

130131130.511 Aug 2026, 22:31 — 130 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 18:03 — 131 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:3112 Aug 2026, 18:03
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:03131+1
11 Aug 2026, 22:31130first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 9 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 2 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
433.3%
👏433.3%
🔥216.7%
💘18.33%
😁18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 10 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jan 2026, 20:12 UTC≈2,030 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩⃝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜๊𓈓 🎞ຼ 𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨، 💞ຼ ຼ 𝐏𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐮، 🫐 ຼ 𝐁𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞، ⬛ຼ 𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐇𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐲𝐰𝐨𝐨𝐝، 🤩ຼ 𝐒𝐮𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐛𝐮𝐬، 💜ຼ 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐮𝐛𝐮𝐬، 🤩ຼ 𝐃𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐉𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐧، 🤩ຼ 𝐒𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐲 𝐏𝐚𝐰𝐬، 🤩ຼ 𝐒𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐲 𝐍𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞، 🤩ຼ𝐇𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧، 👠ຼ 𝐕𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞، 💀ຼ 𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬، 🤩🤩 🤩 ⃝𝐚𝐦𝐞๊𓈓 ࣭࣭Genshin Impact⬪ 🧋ຼ 𝐀𝐲𝐚𝐭𝐨، 🌀ຼ 𝐅𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐚، 🩸ຼ 𝐀𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐨، 🔷ຼ 𝐘𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐧، 🕎 ຼ 𝐅𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐥، 🌌ຼ 𝐋𝐮𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞، 🌑ຼ 𝐅𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐬، 🩵𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐚، ࣭࣭Honkai : Star Rail⬪ 🪽ຼ 𝐑𝐨𝐛𝐢𝐧، ⚜️ຼ 𝐌𝐲𝐝𝐞𝐢،

4👏2🔥2💘1😁1

10 Jan 2026, 20:11 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 11 August 2026

𔗫 🤩🤩 ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴛᴄᴛʙую ʍиᴧый ᴦᴏᴄᴛь ━╋ 🤩🤩♰ Ꮯҕᴏᴩниᴋ ʙᴄᴇх ᴩᴀҕᴏᴛ 🤩🤩ᴄдᴇᴧᴀнных @NocturneLN𓏱 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 канал закрыт!¡ новый @lanyorael

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Collection_NocturneLN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 727,364 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⟅ıI♟️Iı⟆” (@Collection_NocturneLN), 131 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Collection_NocturneLN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.