Channel
@CoinSpoofing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
295subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002470784505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CoinSpoofing |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 30 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CoinSpoofing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 295 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 294 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 296 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 296 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 42.9% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 22.9% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2024 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💸 Our BTC Spoofers are making $$$: 30+ Users Daily are profiting from Bitcoin double spends with CoinSpoofer! 💰 $10,000+ getting cleared daily by users. 🚀 Double spend Bitcoin easily, CoinSpoofer makes it fast and profitable 🔗 Start now @ https://coinspoofer.io 👻 Happy Spoofing! @CoinSpoofing
💰 GetGems.io exploited for $1.5M via flashed USDT. 🚀 Users were able to purchase any NFT on the platform using flashed USDT, including Telegram handles and Anonymous Numbers. 💸 The exploit resulted in $1.5M worth of Telegram NFTs being stolen, including some of the most expensive numbers. 🔗 Start your journey today @ https://coinspoofer.io 👻 Happy Spoofing! @CoinSpoofing
❤1
For anyone confused regarding how to register an account, please read our guide on https://coinspoofer.io/info @CoinSpoofing
❤2
💰 We made $1,000 in under 5 hours, do you want to find out how you can do this as well? 🚀 Check out the guide in https://coinspoofer.io/guide 👻 Happy Spoofing!
❤2
WELCOME BITCOIN 🤑 We have successfully added double spending to coinspoofer.io! ✔️ What does this mean ❓ - 🌐 Send BTC transactions to anyone at a low fee - 💸 Cancel the transaction and quickly receive your BTC back in your wallet again - ⌛ Transactions typically last for +4 weeks before getting confirmed - ⚙️ Configure SAT amount per TX + more settings More news... - 🎮 Support for multiple ETH and BTC wallets have…
❤5🤯1
Soon... 👀
😁4🔥3🤯2❤1
Works perfectly on Atomic Wallet. https://coinspoofer.io
New website design https://coinspoofer.io
1-2h downtime on website, will be up soon Edit: It is up!
Please do note that you can still use older versions of exodus wallet to flex to others that you have X balance in your wallet.
I keep receiving DMs about "can you fix it". -> No, no one can fix it. Exodus patched it. We are working on the BTC Spoofer, it will be released soon. You can still spoof USDT however it will not show in balance.
You can no longer see the balance Exodus. Exodus updated their system recently.
💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CoinSpoofing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 589,180 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoinSpoofer” (@CoinSpoofing), 295 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CoinSpoofing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.