Channel
@CodingRights
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
414subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531171865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CodingRights |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CodingRights |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 414 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 413 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 413 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 October 2025 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 96 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
42 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 66.7% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 21.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#batidão Alô, alô, empolvecides! 🐙💜 Chegou o batidão da semana pra você ficar sabendo do que está em jogo! Separamos notícias que vão do impacto do futebol no aumento da violência doméstica, passando pela história do voto feminino (que está sob ataque no mundo todo), pela criação da WAICO e vamos até os protestos contra data centers nos EUA. Bora! Quando o jogo acaba, o medo começa: derrotas inesperadas no futebol …
#Batidão Alô, alô, empolvecides! 🐙💜 Chegou o batidão da semana pra você ficar sabendo do que está em jogo! Vamos de terreno sendo valorizado do nada 👀, passando por lab desregulado de IA, violência política digital e até o voto feminino em foco. Bora? 🔗Preço de terreno ligado ao Master supervaloriza após anúncio de data center em Minas Gerais | Intercept Brasil https://www.intercept.com.br/2026/07/13/terreno-ligado-…
❤1
A Empolvecida #58 🐙 Alô alô, empolvecides! Hoje tem lançamento novo! 🎉 Conheça a cartilha Desmontando a Máquina: comunicação digital e disputa do debate público! A desinformação não escolhe aplicativo, escolhe o caminho mais fácil pra circular sem ninguém checar. E esse caminho anda cheio: o uso de apps de mensagens como fonte de informação no Brasil chegou a 28% em 2025 (Aláfia Lab). Nos grupos fechados, a máquin…
❤3
#Batidão Alô, alô, empolvecides! 🐙💜 Chegou o batidão da semana pra você ficar sabendo do que está em jogo! Senta, pega o café e vem com a gente. Hoje vamos de falsos médicos feitos por IA até o Google perdendo de novo no Tribunal de Justiça da UE. Bora? 🔗 A indústria global de falsos médicos feitos por IA que usa o medo para viralizar entre idosos no Brasil: 'Achei que fosse real' https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/art…
❤🔥2🥰1
Alô alô, empolvecides! Teremos uma mudança aqui no Canal. Agora traremos os conteúdos divididos por # pra organizar os nossos assuntos. ⚡️ Lampejos | Pílulas de conhecimento sobre comunicação e cuidados digitais, em um formato simples pra você mandar no grupo da família e das amizades, iluminando as estratégias do dia a dia. 📰 Batidão de Notícias | A nossa curadoria vai chegar por aqui! Toda semana vamos enviar notí…
❤5👏2
A Empolvecida #57 🐙 Alô alô, empolvecides! Hoje é dia de festa por aqui 🎉 Tá no ar o Lampejo, nossa escola popular de tecnopolítica, comunicação e cuidados digitais, que começou impulsionado por uma articulação entre Coding Rights, Rede Transfeminista de Cuidados Digitais, Olabi e MariaLab, e vem se espalhando em outros territórios com crescentes parcerias locais. Em ano de eleição, com tanta desinformação, violênc…
👏5❤2
Lampejo, escola de tecnopolítica, comunicação e cuidados digitais. Acesse: https://lampejo.digital
❤1
Alô alô, empolvecides! 🐙 Sentiram a falta da gente? A gente sentiu de vocês também! Demos uma sumida, mas foi por um motivo lindo: estávamos construindo o Lampejo, um projeto a muitas mãos. Neste sábado, 30/05 às 16h30, um Lampejo de tecnopolítica, cuidados digitais e comunicação estratégica chega ao Festival Mulheres em Lutas! O Festival MEL é uma articulação de mulheres que constroem debates e vivências sobre vi…
❤2❤🔥1👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
A Empolvecida #56 🐙 Alô alô, empolvecides! Sentiram saudades da gente? Nós sentimos de vocês! Vimos que muita gente nova está aqui com a gente, sejam bem-vindes! Esse ano já começou com um mundo de emoções 🤯, mas queremos começar esse ano com as memórias da última atividade de 2025. RECONFERENCE 2025 Fomos até Kathmandu, Nepal para participar de um dos encontros feministas mais importantes do mundo, a RECONFERENCE …
❤5👏1
Foi intenso e difícil com todas as mudanças na geopolítica global. Mas estamos muito felizes por tudo o que realizamos, os encontros e projetos que nos conectaram com movimentos que inspiram e nos dão esperança de um mundo melhor. Agora é tempo de cuidado e descanso! Nossa equipe entra em recesso hoje e voltará no dia 05 de janeiro, reenergizada para criar mais coisas em 2026. Agradecemos por nos acompanhar nessa…
❤3❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CodingRights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 87,281 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CodingRights🐙” (@CodingRights), 414 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CodingRights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.