Channel
@CodeBazDev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
660subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001062187689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CodeBazDev |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CodeBazDev |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 660 | -1 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 20:01 | 661 | -4 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 665 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 663 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 662 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 663 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 661 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 660 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 660 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
66 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 39.4% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 37.9% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 15.2% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
برای اینکه claude ai توکن های کمتری مصرف کنه انتهای پرامپت تون بگید «تا جای ممکن کمتر توکن مصرف کن» این رو من دارم امروز امتحان میکنم انگاری داره جواب میده شما هم امتحان کنید و نتیجه اش رو بگید
👍1
تو مباحث استقرار یه چیزی داریم به اسم Feature Flag به زبان ساده یعنی بتونی با تغییر مقدار یک متغیر، یک قابلیتی رو روی پروداکشن فعال یا غیر فعال کنی مثلا یه env تعریف کنی که اگه مقدار داشت، یه route جدید به اپ اضافه بشه یا نه
وقتی rate limit توکن های ai تون تموم میشه صبر میکنید دوباره آزاد بشه یا اینکه خودتون آستین ها رو میزنید بالا و دست به کد میشید؟
به نظرم ai کار برنامه‌نویس ها رو کم نکرده اگه قبلا روزی ۸ ساعت میرفتیم سر کار الانم همون روزی ۸ ساعت رو میریم سر کار فقط اگه قبلا ۸۰٪ زمان رو کد میزدیم و ۲۰٪ آموزش میدیدیم این نسبت الان عکس شده
👍3
برای ورود به بازار کار برنامه نویسی چه کنم؟ - پارت ششم تایپ ده انگشتی + تسلط روی کلید های میانبر vs code اولین مهارتی که هنگام کار کردن از شما دیده میشه تایپ کردن و نحوه تعامل شما با کیبورده خدای برنامه‌نویسی هم که باشی ولی به کیبورد مسلط نباشی هر کی ببینه میگه «طرف اینکاره نیست!» ولی اگه مهارت برنامه‌نویسی ات کمی ضعیف باشه ولی به کیبورد مسلط باشی طرف پیش خودش فکر میکنه «عیب نداره اینکاره است ولی رو این موضوع زیاد تس…
👍2
این چقدر منه 😀
👍3😁1
اصلا فرض کن ai شغلمون رو بگیره. ما که بیکار نمیمونیم! میریم یه شغل دیگه اونوقت اونایی که تو شغل جدیدمون با ما همکار میشن باید بترسن چون ما تو اون شغل ai رو به کار می‌گیریم و رقبای سختی میشین براشون 😎
👍4😁4
نصف عمرمون رو گذاشتیم تا فیلتر ها رو دور بزنیم نصف دیگه اش رو هم گذاشتیم تا تحریم ها رو دور بزنیم
❤4😢2
برای ورود به بازار کار برنامه نویسی چه کنم؟ - پارت پنجم چند نفر شبیه خودتون که اون ها هم دنبال این هستند که وارد بازار کار بشن رو پیدا کنید و همه با هم - اکانت لینکدین بسازید - مهارت های همدیگه رو endors کنید - برای همدیگه توصیه نامه بنویسید - پست بذارید و پست های همدیگه رو لایک کنید و کامنت بذارید نمونه کار هاتون رو توی گیتهاب قرار بدید و برید به همدیگه استار بدید. حالا شاید این سوال براتون پیش بیاد که این افراد ر…
👍2
تفاوت شون اینه که NotImplemented ارور ایجاد نمیکنه و اجازه میده روش های جایگزین اجرا بشن اما NotImplementedErro فرصتی به روش های دیگه نمیده و ارور raise میکنه
👍2
اونقدری که یه برنامه‌نویس برای آپدیت بودن درس میخونه عمرا یه استاد دانشگاه در کل عمر کاریش درس خونده باشه 😬
👍6🥴2
کسی میدونه تو پایتون تفاوت NotImplemented با NotImplementedError چیه؟
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CodeBazDev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CodeBaz.dev” (@CodeBazDev), 660 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CodeBazDev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.