У нас как обычно: планировали видеоотчёт, получили произведение искусства. Но продукцию Коалиции стажёр всё же показал — где-то между танцевальными связками. P.S. Отчёт приняли ✅ Вопросов больше нет.
🤣8🔥4❤3👏1

Channel
@Coalitioncoffee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
317subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002518778167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Coalitioncoffee |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Coalitioncoffee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 317 | +11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 306 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 302 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 300 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 300 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (17 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 258 |
| Reactions total | 58 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
181 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 77 | 42.5% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 16.0% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 9.94% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 7.73% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 7.18% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 4.42% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 3.31% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.21% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.21% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.552% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Coalitioncoffee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У нас как обычно: планировали видеоотчёт, получили произведение искусства. Но продукцию Коалиции стажёр всё же показал — где-то между танцевальными связками. P.S. Отчёт приняли ✅ Вопросов больше нет.
🤣8🔥4❤3👏1
☕️ Прощаемся с летними дрипами Скоро выходит новая обжарка, а значит — пора освобождать место. Дрипы, которые вы обычно разбираете за пару дней, отдаём выгоднее, чем когда-либо: 599 ₽ → 499 ₽ а если оформить подписку прямо при заказе — 399 ₽ Действует до 2 сентября — дальше эта партия уходит вместе с летом. Забрать со скидкой → https://coalition.coffee/cat/drip-pakety P.S. Подписка тут — не абонемент с автосписани…
🔥9❤2🙏1
Помните дрипы, которые мы раздавали на Open Coffee Fest? Многие потом подходили и спрашивали, что это был за кофе. Отвечаем — Колумбия Уила Карамбола. 🌟 Парфюмный аромат, карамбола, клубника и очень сочная чашка. Если тот самый дрип запомнился вам на фестивале — сейчас этот лот доступен в зерне.
🔥9⚡2🍓2
Сегодня решили разобрать самые популярные мифы о кофе. Некоторые слышали десятки раз. Некоторые до сих пор в них верят. А некоторые сами их повторяют. Мы не будем сейчас спорить - а лучше разберем каждый отдельно. Какой миф разбираем первым? Пишите номер или фразу в комментариях 👇🏼
🔥8⚡4😁4❤1
Если коротко: ☕️ Колумбия Уила Карамбола. Если чуть подробнее - смотрите ролик. Там собрали все, что поможет познакомиться с этим лотом без длинных лекций.
🔥7❤3🤩3🦄2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5❤4👏3
Как думаете… что мы точно больше никогда не повторим?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🕵🏻♂️ Дело #2. На прошлой неделе мы начали проверять рецепты бамбла. Сегодня ставки стали выше. В деле: 🍒 вишня 🍍 ананас 🥤кола/гранат 🍅 томат
🤣10😁5😱2
А вы как сегодня запускаетесь?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Понедельник. Кофе сам себя не приготовит. Поэтому иногда приходится выкручиваться. Кажется, если добавить движения с самого утра, рабочая неделя начинается веселее.
💯6❤3⚡2🔥2
Ожидание: открыл свою обжарку кофе - дегустируешь новые лоты, красиво льешь фильтр и рассуждаешь о нотах жасмина. Реальность: коробки, поставщики, оборудование, упаковка, съемки, дедлайны… и где-то между этим - все-таки кофе. Кажется, обжарщик - это человек, который только пьет кофе. На самом деле большую часть времени он делает все, чтобы этот кофе вообще оказался у вас дома. У кого работа тоже оказалась совсем н…
🔥10😁4❤3⚡2💔1
🕵🏻♂️ Открываем первое дело. В интернете тысячи рецептов кофе. Одни реально работают. Другие вызывают вопросы. Третьи хочется попробовать просто из любопытства. Мы решили проверить их сами. Так появилась рубрика «Кофейный детектив». В каждом выпуске берем популярный рецепт из соцсетей, готовим его без прикрас и выносим свой вердикт. Сегодня в деле - бамбл. 🍊 Апельсиновый сок 🍏 Яблочный сок Что оказалось вкуснее? …
🔥12👍4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Coalitioncoffee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете… что мы точно больше никогда не повторим?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А вы как сегодня запускаетесь?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коалиция кофе” (@Coalitioncoffee), 317 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coalitioncoffee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.