Channel
@Coach_Ton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
866subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002119709643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Coach_Ton |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Coach_Ton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 866 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 874 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 878 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 885 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 885 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
92 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 60.9% | |
| 🗿 | 36 | 39.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2024 to 27 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хайповый ли биткоин ⁉️ Приток средств в биткоин-ETF в октябре превысил $3 млрд, спрос достиг шестимесячного максимума Большая часть этих притоков поступила из IBIT BlackRock, крупнейшего ETF по чистым активам, который приближается к $24 млрд общего притока с момента запуска. Индекс популярности биткойна в Гугле сейчас на уровне 2018 года,когда биткоин стоил 6,500💵 У большинства людей интерес к биткойну нулевой,но…
❤8
Ютубер против Эндрю Тейта ✏️ Ютубер Coffezilla разместил клип Тейта, который ранее выдавал себя за криптоскептика «Крипта — единственный сценарий, который я могу придумать, где можно заработать кучу денег, не принося никакой пользы обществу» — заявил Тейт Расследование Coffeezilla показало, что Тейт с тех пор продвигал несколько мем-монет , которые в конечном итоге рухнули. Один из таких проектов назывался «ROOST…
🗿3
Коротко о том, как работает ханипот — полиция американского Дэвисборо собрала наркотики, которые были найдены во время уборки после прошедшего урагана Хелен и попросила их владельцев прийти за ними. Не удивлюсь, если с торчебосами такое сработает Coach Ton
❤4🗿1
Cats за сутки 200🛍 роста Cats в самом начале торгов уронили цену чтобы держатели в панике слили свои монеты и потом запустили цену вверх 🔥 Еще завтра сожгут DOGS и NOT на 4,000,000$ Все так говорят об этом,как будто произойдет что то переломное 4,000,000$ это 0.5% от капитализации ноткойна,поэтому это не так уж и много 🚀Coach Ton
Тем временем кошелек @CryptoBot опустел на 700 000$ за сутки. Еще вчера на балансе было более 1 000 000$, а сегодня всего 300 000$. Паника
Только что неизвестные взломали Youtube-канал некогда популярного блогера Ивангая. Хаю хай, с вам криптоскамергай Coach Ton
❤10🗿2
Мошенники взломали официальный сайт Lego и разместили на нем баннер с рекламой скам-токена, но есть один нюанс... никто не никуда не перешел и ничего не купил. Критическая неудача
🗿12
Обиженные дропом хомяки пытаются найти справедливость в паблике по защите прав потребителей Жаль бедолаг
❤12
⚡️Hamster Combat залистились Стартовая цена токена $0,012 или 1,11 рублей. На разных биржах разный курс bybit выдает сейчас 0.09 Coach Ton
❤4🗿2
Пацаны, напоминаю, сегодня пройдет листинг хомяка. Сливаем добытые потом и кровью монеты Coach Ton
❤2
Муж Нэнси Пелоси зашортил акций Visa на сумму более $500 000 менее чем за 3 месяца до того, как Visa была привлечена к федеральной антимонопольной ответственности. Вчера минюст США подал в суд на Visa из-за монополизации рынка. У них даже инсайдерская торговля более демократичная, свободная чтоли. Coach Ton
❤10
Экстрасенсы всё знали Coach Ton
❤4🗿3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Coach_Ton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,323,861 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COACH TON” (@Coach_Ton), 866 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coach_Ton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.