Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CluvexStudio

@CluvexStudio

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13,592subscribers

+200 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003010356472
TypeChannel
Username@CluvexStudio
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CluvexStudio

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

14,800 average views per post against 13,592 subscribers — an engagement rate of 108.8%. Across the 7,490 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,611 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.83% and 17.6%, with a median of 8.86%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled295,660
Mature posts only108.8% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,592 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 7,490 channels · p10 1.70% · p25 3.83% · p50 8.86% · p75 17.6% · p90 29.9%
Position in cohort99.626th percentile · 12.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.213% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,39213,59213,4925 August 2026 — 13,392 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,392 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,426 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,475 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,498 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,555 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,566 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,592 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +200. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,362–13,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:4613,592+26
11 Aug 2026, 17:5113,566+11
10 Aug 2026, 15:1613,555+31
9 Aug 2026, 18:4313,524+26
8 Aug 2026, 18:0313,498+23
7 Aug 2026, 17:4713,475+49
6 Aug 2026, 15:2413,426+34
6 Aug 2026, 02:3113,392no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0213,392first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.8%
avg views ÷ 13,592 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,800
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.968%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total295,660
Reactions total2,862
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,862 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,01170.3%
🔥33511.7%
👍30810.8%
🕊953.32%
❤‍🔥341.19%
👏291.01%
😍230.804%
🤝130.454%
70.245%
🎉50.175%
🙏20.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,862reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
103
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
79
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CluvexStudio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈2,920 views357 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026

وقت و تلاش های زیادی برای بهبود دسترسی مردم به اینترنت آزاد میشه. اگه واقعا پروژه بدردتون خورد حمایت کنید :))

317❤‍🔥19👍10🤝8🎉2🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈3,120 views242 reactions9 Starsread 12 August 2026

آپدیت جدید Aether: برای بهتر شدن اتصال توی این وضعیت اختلال روی Warp و مسک کار کردم و شانس وصل شدن بیشتر شده توصیه میکنم آپدیت کنید حتما \\\ اسکن وایرگارد درست شد آی‌پی رو بهتر و واقعی تر پیدا می‌کنه. و برای هر آی‌پی فقط یه پورت رو امتحان میکرد یعنی بقیه پورت های جایگزین عملا هیچوقت تست نمیشدن. الان همه‌شون چک میشن. (این رو یکی مشارکت کننده هامون #76 گزارش داد) \\\ پروکسی HTTP اضافه شد پورتش 1820 هستش قبلا فقط SOC

223👍11🔥6😍2

5 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈6,280 views172 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ستینگ دیفیکس DefyxVPN رو چک کنید بخش Connection Method گزینه FASTLANE رو فعال کنید و اولویت اول قرار بدید چند سرور پرسرعت و با کیفیت اضافه کردیم تا اتصال بهتر و پایدار‌تری داشته باشید. (نسبت به گزینه های دیگه توی این شرایط پرسرعت تر و بهتره)

158👍10👏3🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈7,190 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭕️ اطلاعیه: چند پورت مهم مانند پورت ٢٢ بر روی آی پی‌های ایران به سمت شبکه بین الملل از سمت زیرساخت محدود شده است. همچنین شواهد و بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهند که ارتباطات زیرساخت برای ایجاد یک قطعی گسترده در حالت آماده باش می‌باشد. منبع: منیجیت

🕊90👍204❤‍🔥3👏3🔥1🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈6,680 views169 reactionsread 12 August 2026

از وقت و زمانی که گذاشتید Pr بدید و issue باز کنید و باگ گزارش بدید ممنونم. اونایی که بدرد نمیخوردن و وایب کد بودن (کد بی‌کیفیت Ai) قبول نشدن. "سر این قضیه خیلی جدی‌ام" نکته: (مگر اینکه کدی که وایب کد شده اوکی باشه و بدون هیچ ایرادی) بازم میگم از قبل باید دانش شبکه داشته باشید که بتونید توی پروژه مشارکت کنید. من دست تنهام و مشارکت کننده کمه سر همین دیر آپدیت میدم /// هدف این پروژه کمک به دسترسی بهتر مردم به اینتر

153🔥8👍53

4 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈5,880 views196 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یه آپدیت عالی قراره بدم برای بهبود Warp (WireGuard) و مسک/Masque H3/H2 و سرعت h2 قراره بهتر هم بشه. که توی این وضعیت اختلال‌های کشور بهتر متصل بشه. خیلی قراره بهتر بشه. بزودی. :)) خواهیم دید چه میشود.

🔥14136👍11👏6🎉2

2 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈4,410 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @irnetmonitorPhoto

ظاهرا تغییراتی در مسیر های اینترنت بین الملل زیرساخت ایران به وجود آمده ، دیگر به جای اذربایجان و شرکت دلتا تلکام شرکت المانی PCCW Global و ایپی رنج 205.252.xxx.xxx داره نمایش داده میشه ، وضعیت بهتر که نشد هیچ بدتر هم شده ، مثلا پینگ تایم کلودفلر رو 5g ایرانسل قبل محدوده 80 90 بود الان 140 160 ، درنهایت این وضعیت nat کردن اینترنت در ایران داره به یک روال عادی تبدیل میشه که جای تاسف دارد

👍93🕊53🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC≈7,360 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

از کدوم پروتکل Xray/v2ray بیشتر استفاده میکنید؟ و اگه پروتکل Trojan - Shadowsocks حذف بشه و فقط Vless/Vmess و ... بمونن اوکیه؟ نظرتون رو بگید خیلی مهمه بگید توی نظرسنجی کدوم پرکاربرد تره و بیشتر استفاده میشه:

  1. Vless72%
  2. Vmess5%
  3. Trojan5%
  4. Shadowsocks3%
  5. Hysteria4%
  6. Wireguard11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

39🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC≈6,950 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

تفاوت وارپ معمولی با Zero-Trust اگه گرفته باشید پلن رایگان یا Enterprise و متصل بشید توی این آدرس پلاس نشون میده "Warp+" آدرس چک آی‌پی: https://www.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/trace فیچراش چیه: هر درخواست جدا چک میشه (هویت + وضعیت دستگاه) دسترسی امن به اپ ‌های داخلی و SSH/RDP بدون وی‌پی‌ان سازمانی فیلتر DNS/HTTP (جلوگیری از فیشینگ و سایت‌ های مشکوک) مانیتورینگ کیفیت اتصال پلن رایگان: تا ۵۰ کاربر ساپورت میکنه، همه فیچ

👍4619❤‍🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈6,700 views147 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آپدیت قوانین استفاده از نام و برند Aether: یه تغییر کوچیک ولی مهم برای پروژه Aether گذاشتم. از این به بعد قوانین استفاده از اسم، لوگو و برند Aether جدا از لایسنس کد مشخص شده. \\\ هسته Aether همچنان با AGPL-3.0 منتشر میشه و همه طبق قوانین لایسنس می‌تونن از کد استفاده کنن، تغییر بدن و توسعه بدن. ولی یه نکته مهم: اسم Aether لوگو، برندینگ و اسم‌ هایی که باعث بشن کاربر فکر کنه یه پروژه رسمی یا وابسته به Aether هست، جزو

127👏10👍5🔥3😍2

29 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC≈6,860 views171 reactionsread 12 August 2026

کسایی که از هسته ما استفاده میکنن توی اپشون حتما لایسنس رو رعایت کنن و لینک پروژه اصلی هسته رو بزارن چنل! اسم چنل رو نمی‌برم ولی خودشون باید بفهمن. | زحمت زیادی کشیده شده برای این پروژه رعایت کنید. :)) حمایت مالی از پروژه توسط: Dazai AI Accounts 🔗 خرید اکانت هوش مصنوعی: @Chatgpt_storebot کد تخفیف: CLUVEXSTUDIO

145👍20❤‍🔥5🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC≈45,400 views157 reactions79 Starsread 12 August 2026

آپدیت جدید Aether: https://github.com/CluvexStudio/Aether/releases/tag/v1.5.0 \\\ بزرگ‌ترین آپدیت تا الان رو دادم دو تا قابلیت جدید و یه سری فیکس امنیتی. توصیه میکنم حتما آپدیتش کنید مهمه و خیلی بهترش کردم و بشدت بهینه شده و شانس وصل شدنتون هم روی شبکه های پر اختلال هم بیشتر شده: - پشتیبانی از Zero Trust (وارپ سازمانی) "وارپ پلاس" قبلا Aether همیشه به عنوان یه دستگاه معمولی وصل میشد. الان اگه اکانت Zero Trust داری

138👍10❤‍🔥4😍2🙏2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CluvexStudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,500 voters approx.

از کدوم پروتکل Xray/v2ray بیشتر استفاده میکنید؟ و اگه پروتکل Trojan - Shadowsocks حذف بشه و فقط Vless/Vmess و ... بمونن اوکیه؟ نظرتون رو بگید خیلی مهمه بگید توی نظرسنجی کدوم پرکاربرد تره و بیشتر استفاده میشه:

  1. Vless72%
  2. Vmess5%
  3. Trojan5%
  4. Shadowsocks3%
  5. Hysteria4%
  6. Wireguard11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 16,315 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CluvexStudio” (@CluvexStudio), 13,592 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CluvexStudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.