Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

آموزش رایگان فن بیان

@ClubFaneBayan

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,044subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001055872162
TypeChannel
Username@ClubFaneBayan
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ClubFaneBayan

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ClubFaneBayan/511 · this entry31 May 2022, 16:03 UTC@FaneBayanNew/52631 May 2022, 16:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@FaneBayanNew/53712 Apr 2024, 16:05 UTC@ClubFaneBayan/523 · this entry12 Apr 2024, 16:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@ClubFaneBayan/524 · this entry12 Apr 2024, 16:09 UTC@FaneBayanNew/53812 Apr 2024, 16:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@FaneBayanNew/51726 Feb 2021, 19:41 UTC@ClubFaneBayan/504 · this entry26 Feb 2021, 19:41 UTC0.99under a minute
@ClubFaneBayan/509 · this entry25 Jul 2021, 15:41 UTC@FaneBayanNew/52425 Jul 2021, 15:43 UTC0.982 minutes
@ClubFaneBayan/508 · this entry9 Jul 2021, 07:14 UTC@FaneBayanNew/5219 Jul 2021, 07:37 UTC0.9723 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@FaneBayanNew6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (42)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 February 2021 to 12 April 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @FaneBayanNew. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,0424,0454,043.56 August 2026 — 4,045 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,044 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,042 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,044 subscribers4,0446 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,042–4,045 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:254,044+2
9 Aug 2026, 23:314,042-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:044,044-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:474,045first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2024, 16:09 UTC≈16,100 viewsread 8 August 2026

❤️ براتون از قبل کلی اموزش قرار دادم که پیشنهاد میکنم از اول کانال اموزش ها رو برید گوش کنید و بخونید که کلی نکته و اموزش داخلش هستش 🖐 یک کانال جداگانه هم براتون از قبل قرار دادم که خیلی ها فکر کنم ازش استفاده نکردم 💥 کانال دوره رایگان فن بیان که از لینک زیر میتونید واردش بشید و استفاده کنید @FreeFaneBayan @FreeFaneBayan @FreeFaneBayan .

12 Apr 2024, 16:05 UTC≈15,500 viewsread 8 August 2026

❤️ دوستای عزیزم سلام میدونم خیلی وقته که فعالیت نکردم شاید دو سال گذشته باشه خیلی هاتون منو از قبل میشناسین و با اموزش هام اشنا شدین یا اگر تازه وارد کانال شدین میتونین اموزش های صوتی یا متنی منو بخونید تا با من بیشتر اشنا بشید متاسفانه به علت مشغله شغلی و دغدغه های زندگی فرصت فعالیت ندارم ولی برخی از دوستان اگر علاقه مند بودن که راجب موضوعات زیر بیشتر کار بکنند میتونند به ایدی زیر پیام بدن و تایم مشاوره یا جلسات مش

14 Jun 2022, 14:21 UTC≈30,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❓ سوال : سلام وقتتون بخیر توی مدرسه یک دوره آموزش سخنرانی گذاشتن و من هم بعنوان یکی از مسئولین کلاس هستم نمیدونم چه برنامه ای برای آموزش توی کلاس اجرا کنم لطفا راهنمایی کنید باید چیکار کنم. ✅ جواب : داخل عکس ❤️اگر احساس میکنید این میتونه به دوستانتون کمک کنه حتما این پست رو براشون فوروارد کنید تا اونا هم یاد بگیرد @ClubFaneBayan

1 Jun 2022, 18:33 UTC≈27,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

برای کسانی که هنوز نمی دونند دوره راجب چی هستش

31 May 2022, 16:03 UTC≈25,800 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔓 گروه خصوصی آموزش شخصیت شناسی (MBTI) ▫️فقط 20 نفر اول به رایگان می تونند عضو بشن ▪️اگر علاقه مند هستید یا آشنایی دارید با mbti ، شما در اولویت هستید برای عضویت 📥 برای عضویت فقط کلمه " شخصیت شناسی " رو به ایدی زیر بفرستید 💎 @idealsense_ir

23 Oct 2021, 15:14 UTC≈35,100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❓سوال : من خیلی دلم میخواد باکلاس و اجتماعی صحبت کنم ولی بلد نیستم میشه راهنماییم کنید ممنونم ✅ جواب : داخل تصویر ❤️اگر احساس میکنید این میتونه به دوستانتون کمک کنه حتما این پست رو براشون فوروارد کنید تا اونا هم یاد بگیرد @ClubFaneBayan

25 Jul 2021, 15:41 UTC≈35,300 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❓سوال : سلام وقتتون بخیر ببخشید اگه منشی یه مطب باشیم چطور باید وقت بدیم چه جملاتی باید بگیم ✅جواب: سلام شبتون بخیر جمله خیلی خاصی نیازنیست بهترین راهکار واسه پیداکردن جملات خوب واسه این کار اینکه دکتر های سرشناس ومعروف که فکر میکنید منشی های حرفه ای رو دارن ، شمارشون رو از توی اینترنت در بیارین و زنگ بزنید و نوبت بگیرید و صداشون رو ضبط بکنید یا جایی صحبت هاشون رو یادداشت کنید که ببینید اون ها از چه جملات یا ل

9 Jul 2021, 07:14 UTC≈32,400 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔺سوال : سلام و احترام صبحتون بخیر ی سوال داشتم از حضورتون خواستم بپرسم من برا هر کسی ک می‌خوام پیام بفرستم اولش همیشه ببخشید و اینکه مزاحم وقتتون شدم رو به کار می‌بریم. چطور میشه از کلمات دیگه ای استفاده کنم و اینکه برا تشکر کردن از کسی خیلی شرمندتونم رو به کار می‌بریم ممنون میشم راهنمایی بفرمایید 🔹جواب : در تصویر مشاهده کنید @ClubFaneBayan

27 May 2021, 06:51 UTC≈30,900 viewsread 8 August 2026

❓ پست جدیدمون راجب " ساخت و تقویت مهارت شوخ طبع ای و فان بودن " باشه؟ anonymous poll اره سریع تر منتشرش کن – 638 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 92% نه ، موضوعات دیگه ای رو بزار آموزشش رو – 52 👍 8% 👥 690 people voted so far.

5 Apr 2021, 10:30 UTC≈32,100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✅ برای کسانی که مطالب هر آموزشی و کانال و کتابی میخونند ولی بعدش هیچ اتفاقی نمیوفته ، دلیلش اینکه شما هیچ برنامه ای برای عملی کردن اون ها یا حتی مرور اون مطالب ندارید 〽️ به این نکات داخل تصویر توجه کنید @ClubFaneBayan

27 Feb 2021, 07:58 UTC≈30,700 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

این روش به نظرتون جواب میده ؟

  1. اره68%
  2. نه32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ClubFaneBayan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Feb 2021, 07:58 UTCAnonymous Poll1,040 voters approx.

این روش به نظرتون جواب میده ؟

  1. اره68%
  2. نه32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Feb 2021, 10:07 UTCAnonymous Poll4,190 voters approx.

فکر میکنید بیشتر درون گرا هستید یا برون گرا ؟

  1. درونگرام72%
  2. برونگرام28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2021 to 20 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,790 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش رایگان فن بیان” (@ClubFaneBayan), 4,044 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClubFaneBayan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.