🎓 تدوین پایاننامه روانشناسی؛ از پروپوزال تا دفاع؛ با تضمین کیفیت و همراهی تا آخرین روز 💢 چرا موسسه رویش؟ ✔️ کاملترین پکیج: تدوین کامل (پروپوزال، پاورپوینت دفاع و مقاله) با هزینهی بهینه ✔️ تضمین اصلاحات: تمامی اصلاحات اساتید بدون دریافت هزینه ✔️ خدمات رایگان: ثبتنام و بررسی همانندی (Similarity Check) ✔️ پرداخت منعطف: تسویه اقساطی همگام با پیشرفت مراحل پژوهش ✔️ پشتیبانی تخصصی: همراهی مستمر تا لحظه دفاع (با ۱…

Channel
کلوزآپ تست ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی
@Closeup_test
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,321subscribers
+189 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001732488204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Closeup_test |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Closeup_test |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 14,321 | +9 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 14,312 | +7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 14,305 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 14,301 | +21 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 14,280 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 14,282 | +15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 14,267 | +9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 14,258 | +16 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 14,242 | +19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:54 | 14,223 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 14,225 | +9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 14,216 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 14,210 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 14,204 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 14,201 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 14,202 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 14,199 | +11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 14,188 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 14,183 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 14,174 | first reading |
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.744%
- avg views ÷ 14,321 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 107
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (9 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 426 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 33s
- Average length
- 2m 23s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 31 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 67.6% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 32.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
سلام و وقت بخیر 🌱 این پرسشنامه مربوط به یک پژوهش دانشگاهی در مقطع کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی عمومی با موضوع بررسی عوامل مرتبط با شدت سوگ عاطفی پس از جدایی است. اگر ۱۸ تا ۴۰ سال سن دارید و تجربهی یک شکست عاطفی یا جدایی عاطفی داشتهاید، میتوانید در این پژوهش شرکت کنید. شرکت در پژوهش کاملاً داوطلبانه است و اطلاعات و پاسخهای شما محرمانه باقی خواهد ماند و صرفاً در راستای اهداف پژوهشی مورد استفاده قرار میگیرد. لطفاً…
🎓 تدوین پایاننامه روانشناسی؛ از پروپوزال تا دفاع؛ با تضمین کیفیت و همراهی تا آخرین روز 💢 چرا موسسه رویش؟ ✔️ کاملترین پکیج: تدوین کامل (پروپوزال، پاورپوینت دفاع و مقاله) با هزینهی بهینه ✔️ تضمین اصلاحات: تمامی اصلاحات اساتید بدون دریافت هزینه ✔️ خدمات رایگان: ثبتنام و بررسی همانندی (Similarity Check) ✔️ پرداخت منعطف: تسویه اقساطی همگام با پیشرفت مراحل پژوهش ✔️ پشتیبانی تخصصی: همراهی مستمر تا لحظه دفاع (با ۱…
👍 بیان تجربه دانشجویان از دوره CBT و طرحواره درمانی دکتر حمزه علیمرادی در موسسه آموزش عالی مدت 🔹 امروز آخرین مهلت ثبتنام دوره: 🔹 دومین دوره تربیت طرحواره درمانگر 🔤🔤 50% تخفیف 🔤🔤 🎙️ دکتر حمزه علیمرادی 🔹 ✍️ مدرک مورد تایید وزارت علوم (قابل ترجمه رسمی) 🏠 حضوری 🗓️ شروع دوره: 11 شهریور ⏰ روزهای برگزاری دوره: ✅ دوره طرحواره درمانی: چهارشنبه و پنجشنبه و جمعه ساعت 8 الی 14 ✅ طرحواره درمانی پیشرفته: یکشنبه ها…
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤1
✨ درمانگری را فقط نخوانید؛ تمرینش کنید! ✨ 🧪 آزمایشگاه درمانگری | دوره عملی ۱۲۰ ساعته 🚪 گروه سوم اگر میخواهید مهارتهای درمانگری را در عمل تجربه و تمرین کنید، این دوره برای شماست. 🌱 🏆 آموزش کاملاً عملی و مهارتمحور 🎭 تمرین تکنیکها در قالب رولپلی 🛠 ۱۲ کارگاه تخصصی در قالب یک دوره جامع ➕ در دوره مجازی، ۳۰ ساعت رولپلی بیشتر 🖥 حضوری و آنلاین 📌 ظرفیت محدود | اولویت با رزروهای اولیه 🎓 ارائه مدرک معتبر و رسمی با مهر…
❤1🔥1
🔹 ویدیوی توضیحات دکتر عباسی درباره: ✅ شانزدهمین دوره مربیگری مهارتهای زندگی کودک و نوجوان 🔤 50% تخفیف 🎙️ دکتر زهره عباسی 🔹 ✍️ مدرک مورد تایید وزارت علوم (قابل ترجمه رسمی) 🏠 مجازی 🗓️ شروع دوره: 12 شهریور ⌛️ پایان مهلت ثبت نام: ۹ شهریور 🕙 روزهای برگزاری دوره: پنجشنبه و جمعه ساعت 7:45 الی 14 هزینه دوره: پانزده میلیون تومان 🔤💵🔤 هزینه دوره با تخفیف 50%: هفت میلیون و پانصد هزار تومان ❗️امکان پرداخت اقسا…
❤1
✨ کارگاه تخصصی «الفبای رواندرمانگر شدن» نقشه راه ساختن هویت، تخصص و مسیر حرفهای در رواندرمانی 👤 مدرس: دکتر مصطفی قلاوند متخصص زوجدرمانی و مشاوره ازدواج و مترجم کتب مطرح زوجدرمانی 📚 سرفصلها: ▫️ شناخت رواندرمانی و رسالت رواندرمانگر ▫️ انتخاب حوزه کاری و رویکرد درمانی ▫️ آشنایی با رویکردها و نظریههای مهم ▫️ مسیر رشد و حرفهای شدن ▫️ مهارتهای موفقیت و اثربخشی در درمان ▫️ مسیر قانونی اخذ مجوز ▫️ طراحی مسیر شغ…
☑️طرح انتخاب رشتهی ۱۴۰۵ آکادمی ایگو آغاز شد☑️ 📊 پارسال با یک تیم ۵ نفرهی متخصص آماری، پس از یک پروژهی دادهمحورِ دقیق و چندمرحلهای (کمی و کیفی)، مدلی طراحی کردیم که میتونه برای هر رتبه، واقعبینانهترین و بهترین انتخابها رو پیشنهاد بده؛ کاملاً مبتنی بر داده، نه حدس و شنیدهها✅ جزئیات طرح انتخاب رشته: 📊 تحلیل آماری انتخابهای سالهای گذشته (براساس فرمهای انتخاب رشته با رتبه و نتیجهی قطعی) 📊 مدلسازی احتمال…
❤1🔥1
در نظریه آبرهام مازلو ، کدام یک از اظهارات زیر در مورد عقده یونس Complex درست است؟
- این عقده تنها در افراد شکست خورده وجود دارد.10%
- به معنی این است که فرد ، از موقعیت های برتر یا «بهتر بودن» می ترسد.55%
- همسان عقده اودیپ در نظریه فروید می باشد.13%
- به عنوان یکی از عوامل حرکت فرد به سوی خودشکوفایی بشمار میرود.22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام یک از رویکرد های زیر به جای «بیماری» بر «سلامتی» تأکید کرده است؟
- رفتارگرایی7%
- روانکاوی4%
- انسان گرایی63%
- وجودگرایی26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
در سلسله مراتب نیازهای مطرح شده توسط آبراهام مزلو (Abraham Maslow) کدام نیاز نسبت به بقیه نیازها در سطح متعالی تری قرار دارد؟
- عزت نفس49%
- ایمنی8%
- شناختی21%
- ذوقی21%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @Closeup_test. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 36 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در نظریه آبرهام مازلو ، کدام یک از اظهارات زیر در مورد عقده یونس Complex درست است؟
- این عقده تنها در افراد شکست خورده وجود دارد.10%
- به معنی این است که فرد ، از موقعیت های برتر یا «بهتر بودن» می ترسد.55%
- همسان عقده اودیپ در نظریه فروید می باشد.13%
- به عنوان یکی از عوامل حرکت فرد به سوی خودشکوفایی بشمار میرود.22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام یک از رویکرد های زیر به جای «بیماری» بر «سلامتی» تأکید کرده است؟
- رفتارگرایی7%
- روانکاوی4%
- انسان گرایی63%
- وجودگرایی26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
در سلسله مراتب نیازهای مطرح شده توسط آبراهام مزلو (Abraham Maslow) کدام نیاز نسبت به بقیه نیازها در سطح متعالی تری قرار دارد؟
- عزت نفس49%
- ایمنی8%
- شناختی21%
- ذوقی21%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام گزینه زیر جزو خصوصیات افراد خودشکوفا نمی باشد؟
- شوخ طبعی10%
- نگاهی ذهنی به زندگی23%
- مشکل محوری40%
- نگاهی عینی به زندگی27%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام گزینه زیر در دیدگاه کارل راجرز در مورد معنای خود و خود پنداره صحیح است؟
- خود هسته اصلی شخصیت و خود پنداره بخشی از آن است.56%
- خود پنداره بخشی از خود است که طی تجارب زندگی حاصل می شود.34%
- خود پنداره وسیع تر تر خود است.6%
- هر دو اصطلاح به یک معنا هستند.4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
علت ایجاد اضطراب از نظر راجرز ناتوانی در کدام یک از موارد زیر می باشد؟
- دفاع های فرد در مقابل ناهمنوایی خود پنداره با احساس های شخصی فرد71%
- دفاع های فرد در مقابل هجوم افکار ناخودآگاه به خودآگاهی14%
- دفاع های فرد در کنترل تکانه ها و غرایز جنسی3%
- دفاع های فرد در مقابل فشارها و استرس های محیطی12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@modat02142920 · 22,0228 postsکلوزآپ کیس ریپورت و مصاحبه بالینی [اتاق درمان]
@Closeup_Clinical_Interview · 8,4832 postsکلوزآپ خبر [اخبار روانشناسی]
@Closeup_News · 6,2722 postsکلوزآپ نکات کنکوری [ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی و مشاوره]
@Closeup_Point · 9,3871 postکلوزآپ درمان شناختی رفتاری [CBT]
@Closeup_cbt · 12,9261 postکلوزآپ زبان ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی
@Closeup_language · 15,5551 postآکادمی ایگو | کنکور ارشد روانشناسی و مشاوره
@EgoAcademia · 6,0451 postآکادمی گیلان ورکشاپس
@GuilanWorkshops · 8,5841 postکلوزآپ آسیب شناسی روانی
@Psychopathology_Closeup · 5,8531 postکلوزآپ روانکاوی و روانپویشی
@closeup_psychoanalytic · 9,8491 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@modat02142920 · 22,0228 postsروانشناسی بالینی ارشد| بهنام یوسفی
@Clinical_yousefi · 9221 postکلوزآپ روانشناسی - دسترسی سریع
@Closeup_Access · 2,4661 postآکادمی ایگو | کنکور ارشد روانشناسی و مشاوره
@EgoAcademia · 6,0451 postآکادمی گیلان ورکشاپس
@GuilanWorkshops · 8,5841 postدکتری روانشناسی | بهنام یوسفی
@yousefiPHD · 5,2651 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Closeup_test named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Closeup_psychology · 69,868
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
@sefrtasad_arshad · 25,849
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
@konkoreravanshenasi · 21,038
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 25 September 2026
@kaplansadockk · 37,404
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
@teacher_department · 20,936
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
@RMS_English · 52,475
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
@ravanamooz · 22,827
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
@insightAcademia · 58,268
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
@PsyEngAcademy · 21,724
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 September 2026
@iranpsyasso · 24,563
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کلوزآپ تست ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی” (@Closeup_test), 14,321 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Closeup_test.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.