Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

-» ClerkChurch [CC]

@ClerkChurch_CC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003923868868
TypeChannel
Username@ClerkChurch_CC
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 5 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ClerkChurch_CC

Growth

269 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers9 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:4626no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:1526first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.6%
avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.4
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total161
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
1
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1470.0%
🕊630.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: неплохой выбор. CC: надеюсь, тебе понравится. CC: 🤩

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: добрый день. CC: а какой жанр Вы предпочитаете? CC: могу посоветовать Вам некоторые немецкие фильмы и сериалы. CC: большинство из них - это психологический триллер. CC: могу порекомендовать «милое дитя» или «эксперимент». CC: также «кто я», «стерео» и «парфюмер». CC: 🤩

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC11 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

=> лады, одному ты написал... но это же еще не все? кто будет следующим? ... кажись, ты уже придумал.🤩

1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: касаемо одиночества. я тебя понимаю, как никто другой. CC: у меня нет друзей, можно сказать, что знакомых тоже. CC: живу один, с родителями общение не поддерживаю. а брат... CC: хочу его увидеть, но увы, увидеть могу его только на кладбище. CC: его загрызли псины на моих глазах, а люди просто выбросили его, как мусор, тем самым добив его и меня. CC: почему тебе страшно? страх быть непризнанным, страх одиночества?

🕊2

6 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC12 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: к сожалению или к счастью, да. CC: 10 лет жил в церкви не по своей воле. CC: благо свалил оттуда. CC: я просто желаю помочь тому, что отдалённо напоминает меня самого. CC: я не говорю, что мы прям идентичны и тп. CC: все же тебя это задело, и я хочу знать причину, чтобы больше не доставлять дискомфорт ни тебе, ни себе. CC: если ты продолжишь держать все в себе, то сделаешь себе только хуже. я не говорю, что тебе

1

6 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: в церкви запрещено курить. так бы, я чувствую, курил не меньше. CC: хорошо, я перестану так говорить, если тебе так удобнее. CC: ты прав. абсолютно прав. CC: я не психолог, поскольку регулярно посещаю и его, и психиатра. CC: но поверь, за все то время, что я провожу у них, стал не хуже. CC: напротив, я стал больше понимать и углубляться в психологию. CC: почему ты резко упомянул своего отца? тебя что-то конкретно

1

6 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: заметь, что ты не стал меня отталкивать, а начал отвечать на мои вопросы. CC: можно сказать, что немного ты доверился мне. CC: я сам не в лучшем состоянии. CC: дам тебе совет: если хочешь, что понимали тебя, начни понимать людей в ответ. CC: не пробовал ли ты бросить? это вызывает сильное привыкание. CC: на примере меня. мне всего-то 16 лет, а курить начал в 14. из-за сильного стресса в тот период я сильно привяз

1

6 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: как давно у тебя такое состояние? часто упоминаешь спиртные напитки или что-то еще? CC: билл, ты же знаешь, что когда тебе плохо, то не нужно держать все это в себе? CC: возможно, тебе кто-то это уже говорил, но цени то, что имеешь, даже если ты этого не хочешь. CC: жизнь непредсказуема и ты никогда не узнаешь, что может произойти завтра или через пару часов. CC: у тебя есть какие-нибудь таблетки от тошноты? CC:

1

6 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

CC: я понимаю, что мы вообще не знакомы, но я могу поинтересоваться, что случилось? CC: может помогу чем? CC: я без проблем могу выслушать тебя. CC: без насмешки и издевки. CC: 🤩

1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ClerkChurch [CC] ТОЛЬКО ЧТО начал доставать AnnoyedDreamer [AD] CC: добрый день. CC: или вечер. CC: Вы непротив познакомиться? возможно, это прозвучит навязчиво. CC: прочитав Ваш блог, я понял, что Вас зовут Билл, верно? CC: что ж, мое имя Ами. CC: судя по Вашим постам, Вы немного агрессивны. не расскажете почему? CC: это ни в коем случае не наезд, а чистый интерес. CC: 🤩 CC: возможно, что я даже Вам помогу, коль мал

1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

=> оооо, посмотрите, кто тут у нас! это же наш КЕСТЕР АМИЭЛЬ! тебя не было почти МЕСЯЦ. что ты там такое делал? АМИ: я болел. АМИ: очень. сильно. болел. да, болел он, ага. хотя, судя по твоему виду, можно сказать, что это правда. лады, что делаеть будешь? ты все еще несоциализированный мальчик. может испытаешь удачу и напишешь кому-нибудь?

🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ClerkChurch_CC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 941,498 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-» ClerkChurch [CC]” (@ClerkChurch_CC), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClerkChurch_CC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.