Channel
@ClebriTea
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,720subscribers
-1,532 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002106803486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @ClebriTea @NGTDRAMA |
| Created | 15 February 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ClebriTea |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
@ClebriTea was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:01 | 5,720 | -41 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 5,761 | -18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 5,779 | -25 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 5,804 | -35 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:04 | 5,839 | -33 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 5,872 | -76 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:29 | 5,948 | -52 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 6,000 | -140 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 07:18 | 6,140 | +6,139 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 1 | -6,291 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 6,292 | -173 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 6,465 | -45 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 6,510 | +151 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 6,359 | -723 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 7,082 | +22 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 7,060 | -59 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 7,119 | -77 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 7,196 | -51 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 7,247 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 7,252 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 15 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 49 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
281 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 138 | 49.1% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 16.4% | |
| 💔 | 45 | 16.0% | |
| 💘 | 18 | 6.41% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 4.98% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 3.20% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 1.78% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.712% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2024 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ClebriTea. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 February 2024 to 13 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
روزی که هالزی، رسما برند ویکتوریا سیکرت رو بایکوت کرد. هالزی بعد از اجراش توی نمایش مد سال 2018 برای ویکتوریا سیکرت، متوجه شد که مدیران این برند نظرات آزاردهنده و طردکنندهای دربار "زنان ترنسجندر" و "خانومهای پلاسسایز" ارائه میکردن؛ هالزی هم در واکنش به این موضوع بیانیه منتشر کرد، به سازمانهای حامی LGBTQ+ کمک مالی کرد و دیگه حاضر نشد با ویکتوریا سیکرت همکاری کنه. 🖤@ClebriTea
🔥14💘2
Signed k
Sticker, posted without a caption
سولار (MAMAMOO) گفته که اخیرا با اعضای تیمش توی یکی از خیابونهای لسآنجلس درحال قدم زدن بودن که یک مرد، رندوم به سمتش میاد و شروع به فحاشی میکنه و یک صندلی به سمت سولار پرت میکنه و میره. منیجرهای سولار جلوی اون مرد رو گرفتن اما گویا صندلی به سولار برخورد کرده و حتی شکسته، و باعث شده کبودیهایی روی پاهای سولار بهوجود بیاد. 🖤@ClebriTea
💔14😐4
Sticker, posted without a caption
هان سوهی اخیرا گفته که دلش میخواد تا قبل از 40 سالگی ازدواج کنه، بچهدار بشه و تمرکزش رو روی خانوادهای که تشکیل داده بذاره. 🖤@ClebriTea
🍓9
Sticker, posted without a caption
کلوین کلاین، همکاریِ اولش با جونگکوک رو "موفقترین همکاری تجاری جهانی" این برند در کل تاریخش اعلام کرده. مدیرعامل شرکت PVH (استفان لارسن) گفته : این کمپین حدود 5 میلیارد بازدید در شبکههای اجتماعی ایجاد کرده، ترافیک فروشگاه آنلاین رو نسبت به کمپین بهاری رشد 3 رقمی داده و بیشتر از 90 درصد محصولات در سراسر جهان به فروش رفته. لارسن همچنین از تأثیرگذاری جهانی جونگکوک تعریف کرده و گفته این کمپین تونسته محصولات، تبلیغات …
🔥8🍓1👎1
Sticker, posted without a caption
مگان ( KATSEYE ) بعد از کنسرتشون توی پاریس، توی ویورس گفته که "بعد از اینکه از صحنه بیرون رفتیم تا با طرفدارها دیدن کنیم، یکی از طرفدارها سینههای من رو لمس کرده" همچنین از طرفدارهاشون خواست که اعضا رو انقدر واضح لمس نکنن چون اونموقع وحشتزده شده بود از حس کردن همچین چیزی؛ و همچین گفت که دوست داره طرفداراشو از نزدیک ببینه و دستشون رو بگیره، اما تاکید کرد که باید مرزهای شخصی بینشون حفظ بشه تا تعامل خوبی باهم داشته با…
💔14👍3🍓1
بعد از منتشر شدن موزيکویدیو جدید ایوان (هیسونگ)، بعضی از کاربرا اون رو با یسری قسمتهای موزيکویدیو standing next to you جونگکوک مقایسه کردن و ایوان رو متهم به "کپی برداری" کردن. چون سبک تصویری و تصویربرداری ایوان خیلی به اموی جونگکوک شباهت داره، بعضی از کاربرا گفتن : - چرا بعضی از آیدولها فکر میکنن با کپی کردن از BTS میتونن شبیه اونها بشن؟ - الهام گرفتن با کپی کردن فرق داره، این کارها فقط هویت خودشون رو زیر سوال …
👍6🍓2👎1
طبق اعلام بیمارستان کودکان دانشگاه ملی سئول، جونگکوک مبلغ 1 میلیارد وون اهدا کرده برای حمایت از کودکان بیمار و خانوادههایی که توان مالی پرداخت هزینههای درمان رو ندارن. 🖤@ClebriTea
🔥14🆒5💘3🍓2
بانو "بیبی رکسا" اخیرا توی جشن خیریه سالانه amfAR که درحاشیه جشنواره ونیز برگزار شده بود، شرکت کرده و درباره بادیشیم شدنش حرف زده و گفته: "کامنتهای منفی زیادی درباره بدنم میگیرم، نمیدونم با سینههام چیکار کنم چون خیلی بزرگ شدن. از مرد های استریتی که فقط بهخاطر سینههام برام کامنت میذارن متنفرم، اما خب هنوزم دوست دارم لباسهای سکسی بپوشم؛ حس میکنم به اپلیکیشنی نیاز داریم که فقط برای خانومها و همجنسگراها باشه، چون…
🔥10😭3🍓1💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @ClebriTea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ CelebriTea” (@ClebriTea), 5,720 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClebriTea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.