Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Паша Клейнс

@ClayneseShow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,836subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001473264900
TypeChannel
Username@ClayneseShow
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ClayneseShow

Growth

3,8303,8363,8337 August 2026 — 3,830 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,833 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,836 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,829–3,837 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:383,836+3
8 Aug 2026, 15:003,833+3
7 Aug 2026, 15:163,830first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.3%
avg views ÷ 3,836 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total27,900
Reactions total1,246
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,246 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,15792.9%
😡624.98%
🤯191.52%
🤡80.642%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
103
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 19 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
76
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ClayneseShow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC≈1,250 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

тут олег КАФФИ, рокси и азазин мне задания дали повыполнять жоские https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9UteloDl7U

🔥42🤯1

31 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,300 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ой господа и дамы сегодня второй шанс видосу дадим, который я уже выпускал, но он не зарекомендовался))) это угарище сплошное лютое обещаю

🔥33🤯1

29 Jul 2026, 23:33 UTC≈1,250 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026

вот в тюмени вода воняет да ну помоями ебучими знаете вот на улицах стоят автоматы, где можно воду в 5-литровках и 19-литровках наливать? так вот - она и оттуда вонючая хуячит, а уебки (по-другому как назвать?)))) всё равно её разливают. интересно, до первой кишечной палочки или бычьего цепня?) я просто не верю что такая хуйня возможна, это пиздец)

😡59🤯7

29 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,270 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Блин вот я лошара донатофон всего 8 часов продлился Но все равно пасиба было прикольно!!

🔥65🤡4

28 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,300 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

аук на кинч мчится так то

🔥36

28 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,310 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

всем ку тут ниче интересного просмто донатофон https://www.twitch.tv/claynese

🔥31

27 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC≈1,260 views84 reactionsread 8 August 2026

лады господа и дамы я спать не забывайте про огоньки

🔥84

27 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,290 views94 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

фух как хорошо что все спят и огней не будет

🔥92🤡2

27 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,310 views106 reactions76 Starsread 8 August 2026

1000 звёзд и я добьюсь коллабы со свити фокс (ну попробую жена одобрила если что)

🔥104🤡2

27 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,300 views251 reactions17 Starsread 8 August 2026

бля короче 400 огней я делаю донатофон пока жена уехала будем играть в игры смотреть сумерки 5 и делать рэп

🔥251

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ClayneseShow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Добрый Варпач
@WarpathTesla · 145,931
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Паша Клейнс” (@ClayneseShow), 3,836 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClayneseShow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.