🔴امروز هم مثل هرسال، سرجلسه چندتا عکس از دفترچه سوالات کنکور بیرون اومد
😢6❤2👍1
Signed ْ

Channel
@Class_Dars
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,638subscribers
-128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001127931680 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Class_Dars |
| Description | 🌹﷽🌹 گروه آموزشی #کلاس_درس 📚 🎖قدیمی و با اصالت مثل #کلاس_درس درصورت نارضایتی ناشر ، اثر مربوطه پاک میشود . 💬 ارتباط با ما 👈 @Class_Dars_Rbot #We_Respect_Copyright_Laws #مشتی_باش 👊 |
| Created | 10 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Class_Dars |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 11,638 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 11,645 | -19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 11,664 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 11,682 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 11,698 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 11,707 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 11,712 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 11,719 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 11,720 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 11,733 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 11,737 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 11,743 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 11,744 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 11,749 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 11,746 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 11,758 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 11,766 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 11,766 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 28 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (28 October 2025 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,881 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
302 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 128 | 42.4% | |
| 💔 | 73 | 24.2% | |
| 😭 | 33 | 10.9% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 8.28% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 4.97% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 4.64% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 3.31% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴امروز هم مثل هرسال، سرجلسه چندتا عکس از دفترچه سوالات کنکور بیرون اومد
😢6❤2👍1
Signed ْ
فردا براتون بهترینها رو آرزو میکنم و امیدوارم بهترین نتیجه رو بگیرید تو سال سختی که گذشت... با موفقیت و رسیدن به هدفتون داخل دنیای سیاه کشورمون ؛ یک روشنایی برای آیندتون بسازید آرزوی بهترینها رو براتون دارم ❤️🌹🙏
❤7
Signed Haj Ertughrul
آغاز توزیع کارت کنکور ۱۴۰۵ 🔹داوطلبان کنکور تا چهارشنبه ۲۸ مرداد فرصت دارند کارت آزمون خود را از سایت سازمان سنجش دریافت کنند. 🔹آزمون تجربی صبح، هنر و زبانهای خارجی بعدازظهر پنجشنبه ۲۹ مرداد، ریاضی، فنی و انسانی صبح جمعه ۳۰ مرداد برگزار خواهد شد. @class_dars
👌5
Signed ْ
🔺کارت ورود به جلسه کنکور سراسری سال ۱۴۰۵ یکشنبه منتشر میشود 🔹کارت ورود به جلسه کنکور سراسری ۱۴۰۵ به همراه اطلاعات زمان و مکان دقیق آزمون سراسری، از روز یکشنبه ۲۵ مردادماه در پنل my.sanjesh.org قرار خواهد گرفت.
👌5
Signed ْ
🔴توییت یکی از مراقبهای امتحانات نهایی: تو حوزه امتحان نهایی دوازدهم از یه دختری گوشی گرفتیم و جالبیش این بود که پیامهاش رو چک کردیم، همه امتحانهای قبلی هم جوابها رو ساعت 8 صبح از یه شماره ثابت واسش میفرستادن! این موضوع صورت جلسه شد، گوشیش هم ضبط کردن و همه نمراتش صفر رد میشه.... @claas_dars
🤯14👍2❤1💔1
Signed ْ
و بازم دوباره همون داستان همیشگی لو رفتن سوالات امتحانات نهایی تکرار شد . هر سال البته همینه و مسئولین میگن امنیت امتحانات بالا هست و هیچ سوالی درز پیدا نمیکنه در صورتی که شما پول خوبی به آدمش که اینکاره هست بدی سوالات رو قبل از جلسه آزمون داری یادمه تا سال 96 تمام امتحانات نهایی به صورت سراسری تو تلگرام پخش میشد و سال 97 اولین امتحان که دینی بود جوری پخش شد که حتی خبرگزاری ها هم واکنش نشون دادن و شبش اخبار نشون داد…
😭11❤5
Signed ْ
وسایل مورد نیاز برای امتحانات نهایی : ۱. کارت ورود به جلسه ۲. شناسنامه ۳. دو عدد خودکار مشکی ۴. سامانه پدافند هوایی چندلایه ۵. رادار هشدار زودهنگام ۶. جلیقه ضدگلوله تاکتیکی ۷. کلاهخود رزمی پیشرفته ۸. پهپاد شناسایی و مراقبتی ۹. نفربر زرهی ۱۰. بالگرد پشتیبانی ۱۱. مرکز فرماندهی و کنترل عملیات ۱۲. تجهیزات ارتباطی رمزگذاریشده ۱۳. سامانه جنگ الکترونیک ۱۴. موشکهای دوربرد ۱۵. نیروهای ویژه واکنش سریع ۱۶. خودروی زرهی مقاوم…
💔19
Signed ْ
دوستانی هم که عذاب وجدان الان گرفتن بابت مشاهده رایگان محتوای درسی استاد ، استاد عزیز به دلیل قلب بزرگی که داشتن اون تایم که زنده بودن با این موضوع مشکلی نداشتن و همه رو حلال کرده بودن پ.ن : اسکرین شات مربوط به دوران زنده بودن استاد هست که توسط یکی از دوستان برام ارسال شده
❤24💔13
Signed ْ
اولین بار که دیدمش سال 95 بود حدود 10 سال پیش سر کلاس معارفه شیمی و بخاطر سبک خاص تدریسش تو کلاسش ثبت نام کردم ، واقعا استاد بزرگی بود تو تدریس و مدارس سمپاد تهران تدریس میکرد و یکی از اولین های آموزش مجازی تو کشور بود . یه روز یادمه از شدت خستگی بخاطر اون ایام کنکور و تعدد کلاس های آموزشی اومد بالا سرم بیدارم کرد بهم گفت پسر اگر الان اینو گوش ندی فردا روز که کنکور رشته خوبی قبول نشی ممکنه زندگی سختی داشته باشی . …
💔19❤4
Signed ْ
🖤💔🖤💔🖤💔🖤💔🖤💔🖤
😢19❤4💔2
Signed Haj Ertughrul
سالهاست جدا از درس... باهم حرف میزدیم و مشورت میکردیم و مکاتبه میکردیم و...💔💔🖤🖤🖤🖤 چطور باور کنیمممم چطور بگیم الان روحتون شاد مگه میشه....؟🖤🖤🖤🥀🥀
😭19❤2
Signed Haj Ertughrul
استاد اسماعیلی🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀 هنوز باورمممم نمیشههههه🖤🖤🖤💔💔💔💔😭😭😭😭😭
💔19😭3❤1
Signed Haj Ertughrul
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Class_Dars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 229,910 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Class_Dars named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کلاس درس | 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐫𝐬” (@Class_Dars), 11,638 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Class_Dars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.