Channel
@Chow_Trade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,954subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001254762668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chow_Trade |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chow_Trade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 4,954 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 4,963 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 4,966 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 4,971 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 4,979 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 4,985 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 4,992 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 4,992 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
107 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 22.4% | |
| ✍ | 22 | 20.6% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 20.6% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 11.2% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 4.67% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 4.67% | |
| 🤷♀ | 4 | 3.74% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.935% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ethereum has reached a critical decision point on the daily timeframe 1D. Price action analysis highlights a distinct fractal cyclicity that has accompanied the entire duration of the current downtrend. Key Observations & Fractal AnalysisSeries of Identical Consolidations: Throughout the global sell-off, the asset has consistently formed repetitive local accumulation/distribution structures (highlighted by the ova…
❤2👍2
🏆 Editor's Pick on TradingView My indicator Smart Money Trend Engine was selected as Editor's Pick on TradingView thank you everyone who added and supported it! 🙏 📊 What the indicator shows: ▪️ Trend via confirmed BOS no lagging MAs ▪️ CHoCH orange candle warns of trend reversal ▪️ Order Blocks zones where institutions built positions ▪️ Fair Value Gaps price magnet zones ▪️ Liquidity Sweeps stop hunts before…
❤5👍1
⚡️ New free indicator on TradingView 📊 Institutional Order Flow Map What it does: ✔️Detects institutional footprint candles (high volume + price rejection) ✔️Shows Buy and Sell zones with Order Density Score (0-100) ✔️ Highlights Volume Climax — extreme institutional activity ✔️ Flow Direction Engine shows where big money is flowing ✔️ Zones automatically fade when price mitigates them ✔️ Full dashboard with bias,…
👍5❤1👏1
⚡️ New free indicator on TradingView 📊 Dynamic Grid BOT Engine What it does: ✔️ Automatically builds a grid based on market volatility (ATR) ✔️ Shows Buy/Sell levels with % distance from price ✔️ Calculates estimated $ profit per order ✔️Highlights the neutral zone between B1 and S1 ✔️Marks the nearest active level with an arrow ✔️Full dashboard with grid stats ✔️Auto-recenters when price exits the grid range Work…
👍3👏1🔥1
Hey Traders! 👋 The era of manual trading is over. Emotions and fatigue are the biggest profit killers. After the success of my MNT bots, we’ve launched a professional BTC & ETH Spot Algorithm on Binance. It’s live, 24/7, and already delivering results. The Strategy at a glance: 📈 Focus: BTC & ETH (Spot only no liquidation risk). ⚙️ Logic: Advanced entry/exit rules, not just a basic grid. 🛡️ Security: Hardcoded ri…
❤3👍1
📊 BTC. Cycles. Let’s Be Real. 5 cycles. The same recurring pattern: Cycle 1: +12,112% → $1,152 Cycle 2: +9,374% → $20,688 Cycle 3: +2,018% → $66,890 Cycle 4: +714% → $123,385 Cycle 5: +???% → $200k? Every time, the percentage gain is smaller. Every time, the "high" is higher. The pattern exists. But there is one major question: We have already grown from $15k to $125k. Wasn't that the cycle? Everyone was waiting …
👍5👌2❤1
Looking at SOL/USDT… this fractal feels way too familiar 👀 🟢 Pump 🔴 Capitulation ⚪️ Now? Likely a long sideways phase Last cycle, this “boring zone” lasted ~550 days. If it repeats — we could be stuck in a range till 2027. 🚩 Why it matters: Low volatility = liquidity dries up No movement = people lose interest This is where most get shaken out 🤖 How to play it: • Grid bots → perfect for ranges • Delta-neutral → f…
👍6🔥1
The market has added another interesting instrument the CMCap 20 Index. This is essentially a snapshot of the top 20 crypto assets, without the noise of low-quality pumps. It works well both as a market health indicator and as a standalone trading pair. From a technical perspective, the structure is very clean. After an impulse move, the index has entered a balance phase and is now forming clear supply and demand zo…
✍5👍1🤔1
BTC Trading Inside a Well-Defined Range Bitcoin continues to move inside a horizontal range with clearly visible zones used by smart money. 🔴 Distribution Zone (sells): 94,000 96,000 This area has repeatedly shown aggressive selling pressure. Smart money hunts liquidity here, taking out short stops and creating short-term reversals. As long as BTC stays below this zone, there is no confirmed bullish breakout. 🔵 Ac…
🤔4✍1👏1
Bitcoin cycle symmetry? Timing-based overview The chart highlights three major BTC cycles: 2017 → 2021 → 2025. Each spans roughly 1064 days from peak to peak. This pattern has repeated twice, and the current cycle aligns within the same time window. 🔍 Key observations: The 2017 cycle ended → correction + long accumulation. The 2021 cycle mirrored the structure. The current cycle reached a new ATH (~126K), aligning …
👏7✍2
$MON quick update tech + fundamentals. Chart looks clean: Price is sitting inside a deep demand zone, and this area acts as a potential reversal point. If we hold the blue zone at 0.023–0.031, there's a chance for a base → retest → move toward 0.055 → 0.095. However no guarantees. The coin is young, history is short, volatility wild as an unleashed dog. Fundamentals why pay attention to $MON? 1️⃣ ICO on Coinbase…
✍5🥰1
Ethereum Testing Major Resistance Zone Ethereum continues to respect the long-term ascending trendline, maintaining a healthy market structure. However, the price has once again approached the critical resistance zone between $3,500–$3,800, where sellers historically dominated. This area remains a key decision point for ETH: 🔹 A confirmed breakout above $3,800 could open the way to $4,500–$4,800, continuing the mac…
✍4👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Chow_Trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 688,931 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CHOW TRADE” (@Chow_Trade), 4,954 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chow_Trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.