Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
CHOR4LIST ENT.
@Chor4list
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001623463848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chor4list |
| Description | Perpetual on faith and credence with great composers to entrée the incroyable divas o’ th’ glorious 2004 generation. An agency that is a dwelling to cascade great talent that is amazing. 🎤 @Chor4listbot 🎤 @Koyalis |
| Created | 29 September 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chor4list |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 27 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 27 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 29 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
61 reactions across 5 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 14 | 23.0% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 13.1% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 13.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 11.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 3.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2022 to 29 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ㅤㅤ،، ✵ ࣪˖ ── 𝐁𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐮𝐜𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐬 ㅤㅤ𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐞 ㅤㅤ𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐬. 𝐎𝐟 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜, 𝐰𝐚𝐱 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 #𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐑𝐄’𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐝𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐚𝐬-𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝’𝐬 𝐥𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝. 🐈⬛ ┼..⃗. ʾ ִ ֗ ៵ʾ ㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀. . . {✣} . . . . ִ ֗ ៵ʾℋ Bituminous onyx slate dimness disseminated ‘tween fraternization of. Clasp deed bushy-tailed as the dewy conceptualization of merging between inexactitude hence verisimilitude. Overbearing coercive midst unified colorant emolument a blazing blaze of gaiety keenness likewise salient. Mien lineaments shear hence photomontage fasten placid, physique a sapidity dish…
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝐀 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐚 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐲𝐞𝐝, 𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐚𝐲. ⇆ ◁ || ▷ ↺ The day o’ victory given to those who are happy has descended from heaven. Blessings for those who want to get the enticement of every cadence the diva sings. Therefore, as a symbol of delirium, the sacredness of today's wondrous story is given to @Miccheese @AdorJeans @TheDurmstrang @Gol…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Good afternoon Koyalis, at the same time we inform you that Chor4List has officially closed registration! To prospective trainees who have not returned the question form, please send it to the bot immediately, we will wait until tomorrow at 12.00 p.m to be exact.
🥰4
Sticker, posted without a caption
❀ ° • 🎤 The strains of the timbre are coherent and combined in a music book recorded in an entertainment company whose ambition is to gather many young girls to become divas. And this great opportunity is made for girls born in 2004 to prove their talent and ability in singing because Chor4list Entertainment is open audition for those who are talented in singing. Who aspires to be a great diva, is open to girls bor…
🍓5❤2⚡1❤🔥1💋1
Sticker, posted without a caption
⇆ ◁ || ▷ ↺ ❦. 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐯𝐢𝐠𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐥𝐚𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞, 𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐬.
🏆12❤🔥3⚡1🍌1🍓1🎉1👍1💋1
❀ ° • A moed and boldness to winneth in some candidacyc is embedded in their souls but gezonde concurrentie is something yond remains a prioriteit. Walking full of confidence and awareness of the importance of positive ambition drives those folk to this lodging, a lodging yond hones their talent in singing. Becoming a talented diva and did love by everyone for their work and personality is something those they wante…
🕊8❤🔥3🍓2🎉2🏆2🐳2😍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Chor4list. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,168,986 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AdorJeans · 391 post𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐓𝐙𝐘.
@artemitzy · 1141 postBRUVVERS
@Bruvvers · 8661 postCHAERYEONG HOLIC.
@ChaerHolic · 2261 postENHYPEN MAJESTY.
@EnhypenMajesty · 1181 post𝗚𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗥𝗮𝗱𝘇.
@GoldRadz · 3151 postITZY Alliance; #Lia26thSummerLagoon.
@itzyalliance · 1211 post𝗝𝗜𝗦𝗨 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗘.
@JisuTale · 2861 postJYP Bistro: 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐤 𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐲
@JYPBistro · 2821 postLassie Jisu #BLOOMINGLIADAY
@LassieJisu · 2311 postOkinawa.
@oklnauwa · 1,1351 postThe Greatest; ROWTHERZY
@Rowtherzy · 7361 post𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗔: Elysian O' Deluxe #ElyshinDeluxe.
@Shinderellas · 4151 postTEENS ITZY.
@TEENSITZY · 4701 post𝐌𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐭𝐚 𝐃𝐮𝐫𝐦𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠.
@TheDurmstrang · 1261 postThe JYP: Worldwide Artist. 🌐
@TheJYP · 2151 post𝗬𝗘𝗝𝗜 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗧𝗬
@YejiSociety · 3281 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Chor4list named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CHOR4LIST ENT.” (@Chor4list), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chor4list.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.