Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐂𝐡𝐨 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠 | #𝐲𝐮𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧

@ChoChangDiary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

149subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004290656270
TypeChannel
Username@ChoChangDiary
Description𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐭 - Ким Минни Начало: 28.05.2026 Архив: @cdyyyfd Псевдоним: Yuèchán (Юэчань) Приват: https://t.me/+WQ9SFgABxw02YTJi
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 5 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/ChoChangDiary

Growth

149150149.57 Aug 2026, 19:22 — 150 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:12 — 149 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 20:01 — 149 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:228 Aug 2026, 20:01
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 149–150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:01149no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:12149-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:22150first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.7%
avg views ÷ 149 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.0
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
27.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (5 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,380
Reactions total260
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
2
Links
43

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

260 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53751811503837951264818.5%
custom 53842405635559601573814.6%
custom 53799517208833246003513.5%
custom 52242675616543265952911.2%
custom 5375348160187100454259.62%
custom 5967517158375168089259.62%
custom 5260635098448953730228.46%
custom 5409034555057277950197.31%
custom 5226646131722715133114.23%
custom 522655173693148730783.08%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ChoChangDiary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC14 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fiery_SanktPhoto

»»————>Προσοχή ημίθεοι<————«« Проводиться интерактив! Правила его просты: •В комментарий под этим постом вы кидаете ссылочку на свой канал. •Я читаю ваши прекрасные посты, а я уверен, что у вас они прекрасные, и по общему вайбу делаю эстетику того, ребёнком какого греческого Бога вы бы были во Вселенной Перси Джексона. •Репост по желанию Кол-во мест: 7 Дополнительные места: 3 ———————————————— Места: 2/7 Доп ме

8 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TNottForYou

Posted without readable text

Signed 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒

8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026

🍙🍙:: Всем доброе утро и не только. Как насчёт того, чтобы вечером устроить анон-тайм? Вас становится всё больше, и я не могу поверить, что нет ко мне вопросов🐾

7 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC102 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53753481601871004546custom 53751811503837951265custom 54090345550572779504custom 53842405635559601573custom 52242675616543265952

7 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC103 views60 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026

⚪️ ⚪️🎀 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️ расскажу тебе, каково это — когда еще вчера воздух звенел от его смеха, а закатное солнце запутывалось в ресницах, подсвечивая самую яркую улыбку на свете. Каково это — прижимать к груди теплую ладонь и слышать тихий, обволакивающий шепот: «Все будет хорошо, милая», принимая эти слова за нерушимую истину вселенной. А на следующий день из холодного лабиринта вын

custom 538424056355596015718custom 537518115038379512616custom 537995172088332460016custom 52242675616543265958custom 52265517369314873071custom 52606350984489537301

7 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC101 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 🤩🤩 Внизу представлен тренд 🤩🤩 „Я пошутил, одевайся“. 🤩🤩 Некоторые моменты 🤩🤩 — это хэдканоны, поэтому прошу относиться с пониманием и не закидывать тапками. Идею я подсмотрела у Гарри Поттера

custom 53799517208833246009custom 52242675616543265957custom 53751811503837951267custom 53842405635559601573custom 52265517369314873071custom 52606350984489537301custom 54090345550572779501custom 59675171583751680891

7 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC108 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🍙🍙:: Добавила в список ваши фанкасты. Если у кого-то он не указан, прошу простить: я не нашла эту информацию в вашем дневнике. Поэтому прошу написать свой фанкаст на английском в комментариях под этим постом. Также, если я допустила ошибку, прошу сообщить — заполняла на сонную голову 🤩: Набор на КАНОН персонажей открыт, но не надолго, в листе помечены персонажи, которых жду, но так же приму и других, главное не ожп/

custom 59675171583751680893

6 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC113 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53753481601871004545custom 53799517208833246004custom 53842405635559601573custom 52242675616543265951

6 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC112 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌟 🌟🌟🌟Сейчас мой седьмой курс. Зыбкое, обманчивое начало последнего года нашей школьной жизни, который тянется уже второй год со Дня трагедии. Из-за надвигающихся сокрушительных ЖАБА — этих беспощадных врат во взрослую жизнь — профессора методично вбивают нам в головы забытые формулы и даты. Они твердят о решающем дне, но никто из них не говорит о том, какими призраками может обернуться обычная практика по Защите от Т

custom 526063509844895373013custom 537518115038379512610custom 538424056355596015710custom 54090345550572779507custom 53753481601871004545custom 53799517208833246003custom 52265517369314873071

6 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC97 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☁️ ☁️🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 — это ➖➖➖ не просто существо, меняющее обличье по прихоти древней магии. Это безжалостный зеркальный осколок души, сотканный из самой темной тени нашего сердца. Столкнувшись с человеком, он принимает облик того кошмара, той зияющей пустоты, которую мы прячем на самом дне подсознания. 🤩🤩🤩 🤩Эта холодная истина была выжжена каленым железом в моей памяти еще с третьего к

custom 52242675616543265958custom 53751811503837951266custom 52265517369314873075custom 52606350984489537305custom 54090345550572779505

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ChoChangDiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 104,672 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐂𝐡𝐨 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠 | #𝐲𝐮𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧” (@ChoChangDiary), 149 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChoChangDiary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.