Channel
@ChlorineDioxideInfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,979subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001474509761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChlorineDioxideInfo |
| Created | 26 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 3,979 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 3,976 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 3,981 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 3,982 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 3,982 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
716 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 403 | 56.3% | |
| ❤ | 236 | 33.0% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 2.93% | |
| 🙏 | 21 | 2.93% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 2.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 1.12% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 1.12% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.419% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 716reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2022 to 10 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dr, Fontana Helps Man Cure His Prostate and Bone Cancer with Chlorine Dioxide (Spanish with English subtitles): Patient explains how Dr. Fontana helped him cure his prostate and bone cancer along with never catching COVID. http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
👍23❤21🏆3
Dr, Chavez Cures Colon Cancer with CDS (Spanish with English subtitles): Dr. Chavez explains how patient cures colon cancer in 5 months with CDS (Protocol C and Enemas Twice a day). http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
👍15❤9🔥2
Diverticulosis Cured with CDS (Spanish with English subtitles): Susie shares her testimony regarding how she cured diverticulosis with CDS. http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
❤10
Pancreatic Cancer Cured with CDS (Spanish with English subtitles): Jose Luis shares his powerful testimony about how he cured pancreatic cancer with CDS and other alternative treatments. http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
❤43👍5
Warts Removed with Sodium Chlorite (Part A) and CDS (3,000 ppm): This individual had warts around the eyes. They were annoying and would bleed after being pricked, however, they came back again. Sodium chlorite (Part A) was carefully applied with a swab only at the tip for 2 days (it stung a little). Then only pure CDS (3,000ppm) was applied with a swab, the sting stopped after 1 week. They are all gone and did not…
👍30❤26👏19🙏3🥰1
Brain Tumor Gone with MMS1 My friend’s son was diagnosed with an aggressive brain tumor June 2022. He required emergency brain surgery due to severe headaches and the size of the tumor. After surgery, he immediately began taking 2 drops of MMS1 in 4 oz of water 8 times a day. His brain tumor was never treated with radiation or chemo. He has had several MRI’s after his surgery with no signs of any brain tumor. Toda…
❤68👍28🙏11❤🔥8👏2
Breast Cancer Fully Recovered with CDS: This case was an 87 year old female patient that was treated with Chlorine Dioxide for a malignant tumor. The tumor was blocked and completely expelled as shown in the video. This is the moment when the tumor erupted and came out in its entirety through the hole in her breast. Injecting Chlorine Dioxide through the same hole in the breast is recommended for best results. 25…
👍64❤15🥰15🔥6
Seborrheic Dermatitis and DMSO with CDS: This man had facial Seborrheic Dermatitis which took him 2 weeks to get rid of. He would first apply 70% DMSO and wait 3 min before applying CDS. This protocol was followed each day for 4 hours every hour. http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
👍99❤17🙏5
Toe infection and CDS: Infected toe treated in 2 weeks with Protocol D. http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
👍25❤9
Diabetic Leg Wound and CDS: Due to poor leg circulation, this diabetic man has had to be extra careful with any scratches or knocks. Normally a wound like this is not "half healed" for at least 2 months. However, he used CDS sprayed 4 times a day (3 parts CDS and 1 part water), and in 3 weeks it has done wonders. It has dried super fast. Now he always wants to have a little bottle at home just in case. http://t.me/…
👍44❤10🙏2
Nose Tumor and CDS: Pure CDS (3,000ppm) was sprayed every hour and an improvement was seen after the first spray. The protocol was followed for 8 days. http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
👍42❤1
Cheek Wound and CDS: This individual followed Protocol D (Dermatological) for a cheek wound. Three days after the protocol you can hardly see the wound. CDS was applied with a spray bottle whenever the prior application dried or every 10 minutes minimum to one hour maximum. Nothing was applied during the night. http://t.me/ChlorineDioxideInfo
👍28❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ChlorineDioxideInfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 656,839 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chlorine Dioxide Info” (@ChlorineDioxideInfo), 3,979 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChlorineDioxideInfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.