Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 华尔街日报中文版

Channel

华尔街日报中文版

@ChineseWSJ2048

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

1,160subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002081742548
TypeChannel
Username@ChineseWSJ2048
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChineseWSJ2048

Growth

1,1211,1601,140.58 August 2026 — 1,125 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,121 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,138 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,142 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,147 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,160 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,115–1,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 01:461,160+1
27 Aug 2026, 22:041,159+1
24 Aug 2026, 22:431,158+11
21 Aug 2026, 15:361,147+5
18 Aug 2026, 12:251,142+4
15 Aug 2026, 06:371,138+16
11 Aug 2026, 15:511,122+1
8 Aug 2026, 13:131,121-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:161,125first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.944%
avg views ÷ 1,160 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total219
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SpaceX股价继周四天量股票解禁不跌反涨6.1%后,周五收盘继续大涨15.8%,报每股133.11美元,这距离其135美元的IPO价格仅差几美元。 全文链接

8 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#本周热读 索尼影业出品的全球首周末票房预计高达9.27亿美元。据该制片厂称,这使其成为有史以来首周末票房第二高的电影。 全文链接

8 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

周五公布的就业报告表现疲软,缓解了投资者对9月份加息的担忧,标普500指数上涨0.6%,创下年内第26个历史新高。道指上涨0.3%。纳指上涨1.3%。 全文链接

8 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#本周热读 分析师说,受伊朗战争影响,波斯湾供应持续受扰,计划中的增产可能无法完全兑现;但这些增产仍有可能重塑明年石油市场的供需平衡。 全文链接

8 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

美国7月就业岗位意外减少2.3万,远不及经济学家此前预期的增加8.3万。5月和6月的就业人数也被修正。失业率则仍从6月份的4.2%降至4.1%。 高通胀仍是美联储的首要关切,但就业数据降低了市场对美联储在下次会议上加息的预期。 全文链接

8 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#本周热读 航空公司正在抵制联邦当局在全美各机场不断加强的移民执法行动。这一执法策略的转变正值ICE领导层面临来自白宫日益加大的压力,要求将每日逮捕人数拉升至约2,000人的硬性指标。 全文链接

7 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#本周热读 禁售期结束导致多达9.12亿股股票涌入市场,但SpaceX股价周四仍上涨6.1%。一些分析师对这只股票持怀疑态度,散户却视之为“疯狂的买入良机”。 全文链接

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SpaceX和特斯拉计划在得州建造一座半导体制造厂,目标是每年生产1太瓦的算力。 全文链接

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

法官下令Meta Platforms支付超过9亿美元,并限制该州未成年人使用其应用的时间。 全文链接

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

美元走弱的背景下,中国7月份外汇储备小幅上升,同时中国央行连续第21个月增持黄金。 全文链接

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

中国绿色科技公司远景在内蒙古投产一座由可再生能源供电的大型数据中心,以应对日益高涨的AI算力基础设施需求。 全文链接

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SK海力士计划投资约380亿美元扩大在韩国的半导体产能。在AI热潮推动需求不断增长之际,该公司正寻求提高产量以满足需求。 全文链接

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ChineseWSJ2048. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 495,729 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“华尔街日报中文版” (@ChineseWSJ2048), 1,160 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChineseWSJ2048.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.