Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 中国觉醒 · China Awakens

Channel

中国觉醒 · China Awakens

@ChinaAwakens

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002559847833
TypeChannel
Username@ChinaAwakens
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChinaAwakens

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

192019.57 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers3 October 2026 — 20 subscribers7 August 20263 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 56 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 00:3820+1
11 Aug 2026, 17:1619no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:3519first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 00:57 UTC120 viewsread 11 August 2026

🌐 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · English ✨ 投稿内容将自动呈现简繁中文及英文版本 他们在害怕什么?仅仅一张照片就涉嫌分裂国家! 🕒 时间: 2026-08-10 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/481/

10 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC44 viewsread 11 August 2026

🌐 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · English ✨ 投稿内容将自动呈现简繁中文及英文版本 当一件血案被淡化成琐事 🕒 时间: 2026-08-09 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/475/

9 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC50 viewsread 11 August 2026

🌐 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · English ✨ 投稿内容将自动呈现简繁中文及英文版本 国籍不需申请,主权不容置疑——当身份认定成为强权的自我授权 🕒 时间: 2026-08-09 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/473/

8 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC53 viewsread 11 August 2026

🌐 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · English ✨ 投稿内容将自动呈现简繁中文及英文版本 从故宫文物到国号存废:一个海外作家的记忆,照出的是制度之争 🕒 时间: 2026-08-08 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/469/

8 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC57 viewsread 11 August 2026

🌐 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · English ✨ 投稿内容将自动呈现简繁中文及英文版本 追税到二十五年前:财政饥渴下的权力任性 🕒 时间: 2026-08-06 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/462/

4 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

消费不起的不只是钱,还有对未来的信任 🕒 时间: 2026-08-03 11:03 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/449/

❤1

4 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC62 viewsread 11 August 2026

中国共产党是一切灾难的根源 🕒 时间: 2026-08-03 18:53 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/451/

4 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC62 viewsread 11 August 2026

宏福苑大火八月祭:问责缺席背后的权力逻辑 🕒 时间: 2026-08-03 02:06 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/446/

3 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC58 viewsread 11 August 2026

边控扩权:当行政裁量取代法治,公民出境自由成筹码 🕒 时间: 2026-08-03 06:59 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/447/

31 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC82 viewsread 11 August 2026

彭水山崩41命:天灾背后,谁在为无人问责的体制买单? 🕒 时间: 2026-07-29 12:12 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/439/

30 Jul 2026, 02:25 UTC91 viewsread 11 August 2026

填写真实加班经历竟获罪:口袋罪背后的权力恣意 🕒 时间: 2026-07-29 04:10 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/438/

27 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC85 viewsread 11 August 2026

从墨索里尼下台83周年看今天的中国 🕒 时间: 2026-07-26 10:39 🔗 链接: https://chinaawakens.org/archives/430/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ChinaAwakens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“中国觉醒 · China Awakens” (@ChinaAwakens), 20 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChinaAwakens.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.