Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙱𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚆𝚊𝚝𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚛

Channel

𝙱𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚆𝚊𝚝𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚛

@Chillguywatcher

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

40,007subscribers

-2,881 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002476073737
TypeChannel
Username@Chillguywatcher
Descriptionفیلم و سریال‌بازی که ادعا میکنه فیلم و سریال‌بازه فیلم و سریال‌باز نیست. اگر احیانا اسم یا خلاصه فیلم و سریالی رو خواستی : @Bingewatcherukbot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chillguywatcher

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

40,00742,88841,447.56 August 2026 — 42,888 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,847 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,697 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,565 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,380 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,210 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,059 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,909 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,816 subscribers15 August 2026 — 41,757 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,580 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,468 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,391 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,523 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,569 subscribers23 August 2026 — 41,685 subscribers24 August 2026 — 41,746 subscribers25 August 2026 — 41,766 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,696 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,577 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,481 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,358 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,226 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,112 subscribers2 September 2026 — 41,001 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,890 subscribers5 September 2026 — 40,737 subscribers8 September 2026 — 40,395 subscribers11 September 2026 — 40,549 subscribers13 September 2026 — 41,041 subscribers14 September 2026 — 41,278 subscribers16 September 2026 — 40,984 subscribers19 September 2026 — 40,652 subscribers25 September 2026 — 40,007 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -2,881. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,575–43,320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 19:1640,007-645
19 Sept 2026, 02:1940,652-332
16 Sept 2026, 14:0140,984-294
14 Sept 2026, 16:5741,278+237
13 Sept 2026, 04:5841,041+492
11 Sept 2026, 05:1940,549+154
8 Sept 2026, 11:1740,395-342
5 Sept 2026, 06:1740,737-153
3 Sept 2026, 09:0740,890-111
2 Sept 2026, 00:0841,001-111
1 Sept 2026, 01:4941,112-114
30 Aug 2026, 23:3541,226-132
29 Aug 2026, 22:1641,358-123
28 Aug 2026, 20:1441,481-96
27 Aug 2026, 21:1641,577-119
26 Aug 2026, 20:0641,696-70
25 Aug 2026, 18:0941,766+20
24 Aug 2026, 20:2941,746+61
23 Aug 2026, 06:5441,685+116
21 Aug 2026, 16:0741,569first reading

Engagement

747 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.17%
avg views ÷ 40,007 subscribers
Avg views / post
869
376 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
376
of 747 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 376 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held747 (5 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total326,593
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈953
Videos
≈4,310
Links
≈116

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 53m
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 576 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
36
of 746 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Chillguywatcher. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 747 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 20:45 UTC303 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

برادران روسو تائید کردن هیچ صحنه شوخی یا فانی قرار نیست در اونجرز دوومزدی باشه و بیشترین آمار مرگ و میر در تمام فیلم های مارول رو داره. @Chillguywatcher | #Doomsday

Signed 𝗔𝘀𝗮𝗹

28 Sept 2026, 19:57 UTC439 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

شین هرموقع ریک از کاراش بهونه میگیره: @Chillguywatcher | #TWD

Signed 𝗔𝘀𝗮𝗹

28 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC739 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

شاهکاری به اسم مارول. @Chillguywatcher | #Marvel

Signed 𝖭𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺

28 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC763 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

بین کلی فندوم گم شدم! @Chillguywatcher | #Mix

Signed 𝖭𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺

28 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC752 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

حق با شما بود آقای وینستون عزیز فقط ما دیر فهمیدیم! @Chillguywatcher | #DarkestHour

Signed 𝖭𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺

28 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC770 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

برای درک کردن کرولاین باید هشت فصل سریال دیده باشید. @Chillguywatcher | #TVD

Signed 𝖭𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺

28 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC795 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

بامزه ترین داستان و افتضاح ترین پایان. @Chillguywatcher | #StrangerThings

Signed 𝖭𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺

28 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC831 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

پیرمردهای موردعلاقم. @Chillguywatcher | #Mix

Signed 𝖭𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺

Showing the 12 most recent of 747 posts we hold for @Chillguywatcher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Chillguywatcher edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 23 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTCAnonymous Poll183 voters

Which one?

  1. Dekster65%
  2. Patrick45%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTCFinal Results291 voters

‌

  1. Loki53%
  2. Hannibal47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTCFinal Results274 voters

‌

  1. Jon Snow64%
  2. Walter White36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTCFinal Results412 voters

‌

  1. Queen Daenerys49%
  2. Dean Winchester51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTCFinal Results323 voters

‌

  1. Jesse Pinkman34%
  2. Steve Harrington66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Sept 2026, 00:12 UTCAnonymous Poll171 voters

‌

  1. Walter White56%
  2. Daryl Dixon44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 747 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙱𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚆𝚊𝚝𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚛” (@Chillguywatcher), 40,007 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chillguywatcher.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.