Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Bot

ЧЕРКАСИОБЛЕНЕРГО

@Cherkasyoblenergo_bot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

66,989monthly users

-1,412 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID1375484318
TypeBot
Username@Cherkasyoblenergo_bot
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cherkasyoblenergo_bot

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

66,61469,33567,974.57 August 2026 — 68,401 monthly users11 August 2026 — 68,353 monthly users11 August 2026 — 68,353 monthly users14 August 2026 — 68,543 monthly users19 August 2026 — 68,516 monthly users24 August 2026 — 68,661 monthly users27 August 2026 — 68,785 monthly users29 August 2026 — 68,851 monthly users30 August 2026 — 68,511 monthly users31 August 2026 — 69,335 monthly users2 September 2026 — 66,938 monthly users3 September 2026 — 66,927 monthly users9 September 2026 — 66,614 monthly users11 September 2026 — 66,756 monthly users17 September 2026 — 66,635 monthly users19 September 2026 — 66,989 monthly users66,9897 August 202619 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66,206–69,743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:3866,989+354
17 Sept 2026, 03:4166,635-121
11 Sept 2026, 19:3766,756+142
9 Sept 2026, 09:1966,614-313
3 Sept 2026, 17:4166,927-11
2 Sept 2026, 10:4366,938-2,397
31 Aug 2026, 14:2369,335+824
30 Aug 2026, 16:1468,511-340
29 Aug 2026, 12:5568,851+66
27 Aug 2026, 13:5568,785+124
24 Aug 2026, 15:0368,661+145
19 Aug 2026, 10:2568,516-27
14 Aug 2026, 14:1568,543+190
11 Aug 2026, 16:2368,353no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:2368,353-48
7 Aug 2026, 07:4668,401first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЧЕРКАСИОБЛЕНЕРГО” (@Cherkasyoblenergo_bot), 66,989 monthly users as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cherkasyoblenergo_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.