Channel
@ChavoshiTrain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,844subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001008483154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChavoshiTrain |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChavoshiTrain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,844 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 1,852 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 1,858 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 1,861 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 1,861 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,978 |
| Reactions total | 1,093 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,560 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 911 | 58.4% | |
| ❤ | 305 | 19.6% | |
| 👎 | 290 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 3.01% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 0.449% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,560reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❌ با عنایت به خارجشدن بخش کامنتها از حالت دوستانه و عدم درج کامنتها صرفاً در خصوص همان پست و اینکه کامنتها به توهین و فحاشیهای ناموسی و بسیار بسیار زشت رسیده است، بخش کامنتها بسته خواهد شد. با احترام... @ChavoshiTrain
👍33👎5❤2🤬2
فعلا یادداشت کنیم، برخی از توهینها و فحاشیهایش در متنها و آهنگها خطاب به دیگران: نعلینپوش عربدهکِش جیببُر پشیمان مثل سگ سنگدل روسیاه دریده دهاننجس بیادب مریض واجبالمطب تجزیهطلب ملتمسِ اهرمن اگر چیزی باقی مانده، شما در کامنتها بگویید...
👍49👎8🤬1
بیایید کمی به عقب برگردیم... چرا وقتی به استاد و بزرگترِ خود فحاشی و توهین کرد و گفت: «عربدهکِش»، ما هواداران سابقش در دهان او نزدیم و انتقاد نکردیم؟ چرا جای انتقاد، حمایت کردیم؟ چرا وقتی «واقعاً» در یکی از آهنگهایش، «ترویج خشونت» کرد، انتقاد نکردیم و روی به تفسیر و توجیه آوردیم؟ شاید حق با فلانی و فلانی بود. ما چرا نابینا بودیم؟ «خودانتقادی» اگر دریچۀ ما باشد، باید شرمسارِ خیلی چیزها باشیم. ما عذرخواهیم... #ابی…
👍58👎8❤3
دیکتاتورهای مقدس ✍️مصطفی داننده دیکتاتوری از روز اول با زندان و سانسور آغاز نمیشود بلکه زمانی کلید میخورد که مردمان تصمیم میگیرند کسی را آنقدر بزرگ کنند که دیگر نتوانند از او بپرسند: «اگر اشتباه کردی، چه؟» از همان لحظه، شکست آزادی شروع میشود. جامعهای که انسان میسازد، زنده است. اما جامعهای که بت میسازد، آرامآرام میمیرد. زیرا بتها نه پاسخ میدهند، نه عذرخواهی میکنند و نه اجازه میدهند کسی دربارهشان سؤا…
👍41👎5❤2🔥1
گاهی یک دکمۀ 👍 یا 👎 زیر یک پست تلگرام، از صدها صفحه مقاله و تحلیل جامعهشناسی، تصویر واقعیتری از افکار عمومی ارائه میدهد. ریاکشنهای کاربران، واکنشی آنی، داوطلبانه و بیواسطه به یک موضوع مشخص هستند. وقتی دهها یا صدها هزار نفر بدون اجبار، تنها با یک لمس، موافقت یا مخالفت خود را ثبت میکنند، این کار بازتابی از احساس و قضاوت جامعه است؛ چیزی که گاهی در چارچوبهای رسمی پژوهشی دیده نمیشود. اگر هدف، سنجشِ سریع و بی…
👍109❤29🔥22👎15
ریاکشنها به آهنگ جدید... بزرگترین ضربهزنِ حاضر به اعتقادات و دین، ایشان است گویا
👍71👎24
این جهان کوه است و فعلِ ما ندا سوی ما آید نداها را صدا فعل تو كان زايد از جان و تنت همچو فرزندت بگيرد دامنت پس تو را هر غم كه پيش آيد ز درد بر كسی تهمت منه، بر خويش گرد توبه کن مردانه سر آور به ره که «فمن یعمل بمثقال یره» «حضرت مولانا» ❤️
❤30👍5👎3
روبیکا :)))))))) محل درج پلیلیستش رو هم به جای فکر، با بادِ سیاسی انتخاب کرده!
👍48👎12
یعنی اسکار آگاهترین و باشعورترین افراد، اعطا میشود به هواداران م.چاوشی او برای خودش «مرجعیت» قائل بود. توهّمی بسیار زیاد، ناشی از این تصور که: «من در بین مردم، مَرجع هستم و هر آنچه بگویم و به اشارتی توصیف کنم، همۀ هوادارانم و اکثر مردم، همصدا با من میپذیرند»! با همین توهّم، فکر میکرد اگر «فلان آهنگ» را بخواند و آن بیانیه کذایی را منتشر کند، به افکار ایرانیان و بهویژه هوادارانِ خودش جهت میدهد. اما... اما در ع…
👍114❤33🔥20👎14🤬2
ما کسی را که میشناختیم به خاطر بیاحترامی به کسانی که نمیشناختیم از زندگیمان حذف کردیم. «شرف» برای ما مهمتر از «قِدمت» بود.
❤104👍30👎22
یالا، پاشو... نمیشه که فقط «بخوانی» و به همه «توهین و فحاشی» کنی. جانفداییات و رهروی علی بودنت را در «عمل» نشان بده و برو «جنوب». آخه توی آهنگ ریاکارانۀ «نخلای بیسر»، خودت گفتی: خدایا... نذار با دستای خالی به خرمشهر برگردم. یالا... دستاتو پُر کن و برو به خرمشهر و بندر و جنوب. حتماً که پر از سلاح هم نباید باشه. مثل #رسول_خادم مرد باش و فقط برای روحیهدادن و کنار مردمبودن هم که شده، برو... یالا... جانفدابودن که …
👍129👎39
برای کسی که سقوط کرد، گویی که هیچگاه نبوده است... (همراه با حسّ تنفر و البته رهایی از او و دنیایش) گاهی بزرگترین شکست یک هنرمند، نه در فروش آثارش رقم میخورد، نه در افت کیفیت کارش؛ بلکه در لحظهای آغاز میشود که خیال میکند دیگر نیازی به شنیدن هیچ صدای متفاوتی ندارد. از آن لحظه به بعد، مسیر سقوط آرامآرام شکل میگیرد؛ سقوطی که شاید در ظاهر دیده نشود، اما در حافظهی تاریخ ثبت میشود. محسن چاوشی، اگر قرار باشد روزی …
👍99👎31🔥4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ChavoshiTrain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
آیا به نظر شما محسن چاوشی یک پروژه بوده است؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
و در پایان، احساس فعلی شما نسبت به محسن چاوشی چیست؟
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگر امروز برای اولین بار با چاوشی آشنا میشدید، احتمال هوادار شدنِ شما چقدر بود؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
مهمترین انتظار شما از محسن چاوشی چیست؟
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,299,508 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChavoshiTrain” (@ChavoshiTrain), 1,844 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChavoshiTrain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.