小娜娜瘦底,服務超掂,冲涼細心洗棒,上場挑逗眼神咁淫,正場入洞啱啱入位,多水抽插加速,叫聲越來越響,轉狗仔一手揸波一手揸腳推,幾分鐘攪掂🤗

Channel
kiki看图号请打51038889
@Chauchau65773532
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
12,850subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001326579912 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chauchau65773532 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chauchau65773532 |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 12,850 | -6 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 12,856 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 12,860 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 12,864 | -10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 12,874 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 12,873 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:13 | 12,884 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 12,881 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 12,882 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 12,890 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 12,885 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 12,882 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 12,881 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 12,876 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 12,877 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 12,879 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 12,880 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 12,878 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 12,885 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 12,886 | first reading |
Engagement
422 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.20%
- avg views ÷ 12,850 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 154
- 172 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.455%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 172
- of 422 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 172 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 422 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,569 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 49s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 34 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 422 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 422 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
可可真係唔錯,瘦底波波都幾大,溫柔體貼,好女朋友感覺,服務無得挑剔,叫她吹幾耐都得,十分滿意
小密樣子甜美,最正係对波十分正,導彈木瓜型又弹手,身材也是我喜歡的丰满型但不覺肥,好好揽。 吹工了得,多水,反應好好,但表情怕怕羞羞,反而覺得更過瘾,好像偷情的感覺好興奮,回味無窮,必定返食😆
美兒波大腰幼,能聽廣東話,吹吸力強,好鐘意吹,69完又狂吸,好放,女上不停要我揸佢波
食咗麦豆唔駛等直接入房,同相一樣靚女走肥大大D波。O破冰,好快投入服務,吹功正差啲爆,各種服務頂呱呱👍後入patpat好好砌,大車爽爽爆射精,服務真係難得。下次再來
錦兒吹功不得了 ,身材好好 ,走肥,互動正又淫,後推冇得頂,謝謝啦
欣欣非常好,技術都滿分,幫除衫,吹功下下深喉,配合度極高,轉換post冇黑面,好主動,值得食
嘆完美兒白皮膚,兩個大巨蛋,沖完涼仲會幫我好仔細抺乾淨,對波好好渣,漫游,男上望住佢對飛彈,視覺一流😁最後後插緊西好快投降😜,事後仲用腳挑我心口👍👍
沙沙靚女後生靚波,講話細聲細氣,笑容好甜,幫解甲 陪浴細心 有水簫上床淫味十足
啱啱周周推介小凤、真的非常不错、人靓有礼貌、特别是上面两点好似十八岁小姑娘一样一点没有下垂奶头粉红、下面又窄、太好操了。她又告诉说我们慢慢来做不急、真的找所有美女没有这幺好的、一定返食.
#旺角塘尾道206号东方泛达酒店 楠木 真人真实照片 162高,C波,23岁 初做新鲜女神 大家快点约 65773532 51038889
#北角英皇道379号福英大厦 锦儿 真人真实照片来自于南昌 167高,23岁,C波 前凸后翘高瘦S型 初做小鸟依人女友feel 白滑长腿激情狂野 大家速约 65773532 51038889
Showing the 12 most recent of 422 posts we hold for @Chauchau65773532. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kiki看图号请打51038889” (@Chauchau65773532), 12,850 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chauchau65773532.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.