Channel
@Chatu007_guanfang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,950subscribers
-128 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004313546593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chatu007_guanfang |
| Description | 🌸007官方小颖（认准888✈️ @chat0O7kefu）备用 @Chiat007com 🌸 认准客服号 谨防被骗哦 🌸 双向联系 @Chats0O7Officialbot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 26 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chatu007_guanfang |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 15,950 | -20 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 15,970 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 15,978 | -25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 16,003 | -39 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 16,042 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 16,058 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 16,061 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 16,078 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 16,078 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (26 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,615 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
尊敬的用户： 近期有客户反馈，有不法分子假冒 007 官方客服欺骗客户。特别提醒：飞机（Telegram）用户名 等名称中带有「多米」的账号，均不是我司官方客服，请广大用户务必提高警惕！ 此类骗子通常会以「客服多米」等名义主动联系客户，诱导客户进行私下交易、转账汇款或透露账户信息， 进而实施诈骗，给您造成资金损失。 为保障您的账户与资金安全，请务必做到： - 上述账号及一切自称「多米客服」的人员均与 007CHAT 平台无关，请勿相信； - 请勿与任何陌生账号进行私下交易，切勿转账、汇款或透露密码、验证码； - 进行任何操作前，请务必认准 007CHAT 正版官方客服系统，通过官方渠道联系客服核实； - 如已发生联系或交易，请立即停止，并及时通过官方渠道向我们反馈。
如果出现工作台链接这里域名是空的情况下，说明你们的域名被封哦~ 解决方案：如图所示，第二张，去系统分配域名里面点击申请一个新的域名， 然后去复制最新的链接重新接入使用
之前找这个客服开过户的，系统有问题也可以直接联系我处理，不要再跟我们非官方的客服有任何交易行为，给你们开的系统也可能是盗版的007系统，大家一定要小心谨慎🌸
目前发现有欺骗客户拿钱跑路的实例，大家不要再找这个客服处理我们007客服系统的问题 ，有问题可以直接私信联系我🌸
这个客服已经被开除，并非我们007官方客服了，有之前跟他开户的有问题可以联系我 ，如果继续找他开户续费等被骗，007官方还不负责哦 ❤️
一次性购买一年以上独立部署的独立部署大客户，可以申请专享云账号，享自建独立的企业ip池。有需求的可以私信联系我🌸
🌸唯一官方频道 https://t.me/Chat007_guanfang 🌸 007开户联系✈️ ： https://t.me/chat007kefu
在逐步恢复中了哈，大家再耐心等几分钟
有缓存，在慢慢都在恢复了
cdn是逐步恢复中
刷新再试试
独立部署的老板们 进不去的 全部找我换新的独立部署域名链接
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Chatu007_guanfang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 37,798 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“007chat官方通知频道（小颖🌸） Chat007_guanfang chat007kefu Chat007com” (@Chatu007_guanfang), 15,950 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chatu007_guanfang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.