Channel
@ChatGPTpp
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,614subscribers
-1,189 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003567597598 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChatGPTpp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 6 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChatGPTpp |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 23 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @gptchatrr/216 Mar 2026, 17:11 UTC | @ChatGPTpp/21 · this entry6 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @gptchatrr/256 Mar 2026, 17:11 UTC | @ChatGPTpp/25 · this entry6 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @gptchatrr/266 Mar 2026, 17:11 UTC | @ChatGPTpp/26 · this entry6 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @gptchatrr/276 Mar 2026, 17:11 UTC | @ChatGPTpp/27 · this entry6 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @gptchatrr/316 Mar 2026, 17:11 UTC | @ChatGPTpp/31 · this entry6 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @gptchatrr/356 Mar 2026, 17:11 UTC | @ChatGPTpp/35 · this entry6 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @gptchatrr | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @gptchatrr (8–0) |
| @gptchatopen | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 minutes | @gptchatopen (8–0) |
| @technomotel | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 45 hours | @technomotel (8–0) |
| @GPTonChat | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 minutes | @GPTonChat (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 29 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 March 2026 to 6 March 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 23 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @technomotel. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 23 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 03:48 | 6,614 | -63 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 6,677 | -24 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:59 | 6,701 | -133 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:10 | 6,834 | -59 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 6,893 | -23 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:44 | 6,916 | -20 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 6,936 | -23 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 6,959 | -25 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 6,984 | -23 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 7,007 | -31 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 7,038 | -89 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 7,127 | -62 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 7,189 | -104 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 7,293 | -39 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 7,332 | -58 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 7,390 | -75 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 7,465 | -52 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 7,517 | -41 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 7,558 | -32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 7,590 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Технарь из Лондона создал ВЕЙПОМОБИЛЬ — он запустил электрокар на 500 аккумуляторов от одноразок. За основу была взята Reva G-Wiz — электрическая микротачка из Индии весом 400 килограммов. Инженер подключил к ней полтысячи электронок, собранных в 14 модулей и выдающих примерно 50 вольт. Чтобы всё держалось на месте, парню пришлось собрать особый корпус, добавить дополнительную изоляцию и отрегулировать вибрации с п…
Это аркадный автомат для ТАРАКАНОВ — инженер из Индии собрал самый крохотный в мире игровой аппарат. Размеры девайса составляют всего 2,5 x 1,5 x 1,5 сантиметров — рядом с ним даже пальчиковая батарейка выглядит внушительно. На микрогаджете можно сыграть в Space Invaders, но без лупы не обойтись. Объясни свою маленькость 👀
⚡️ Новая модель GPT-5.4 ВЫШЛА — её представили на следующий день после релиза GPT-5.3. OpenAI улучшил модельку по всем параметрам — теперь это самая функциональная и эффективная модель для профессиональной работы. Кроме того, теперь это самая достоверная модель компании: «вероятность ошибок в ответах на 18% ниже, а вероятность ложности отдельных утверждений на 33% ниже по сравнению с GPT -5.2». GPT-5.4 Thinking т…
⚡️ Теперь Макбуки доступны КАЖДОМУ — Apple показала бюджетный MacBook Neo за 599 долларов или 46 тысяч рублей. Он работает на айфоновском процессоре A18 Pro, и это самый дешёвый Мак в истории. Налетай, не скупись 💳
В Японии создали очки «ДЛЯ ПАУКОВ» — у них восемь линз вместо двух. Бренд Issey Miyake Eyes показал солнцезащитные очки UROKO, что переводится как «чешуя». Их внешний вид это подтверждает — аксессуар похож на ожерелье из чешуек. Инопланетная мода 👽
Обезьянка Панчи стал ГЕРОЕМ ИГРЫ — фанаты создали браузерный файтинг Zoo Fighter о милой макаке. Панчи — это самый популярный примат в интернете на данный момент. Мама бросила его, собратья невзлюбили, и единственным другом малыша стал игрушечный орангутан. Избиваем недругов крохи тут 👊
Новый Макбук показали ВЖИВУЮ — как и другие Apple-ноутбуки, он открывается одним пальцем. Как вам, яблочники? 🤨
Технарь обнаружил, что светодиод в отработанном моторном масле создаёт эффект «солнечного затмения» или даже «чёрной дыры». «Интерстеллар» в гараже 😳
Chupa Chups создал БРОНИРОВАННЫЙ леденец — новую упаковку невозможно открыть. Конфетка Impossible запечатана в углеродную композитную оболочку, обернута арамидными волокнами, покрыта карбидом кремния и погружена в жидкую резину. Фантик не поддаётся ни ножу, ни огню. Кариес не пройдёт 🙄
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ChatGPTpp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧатГПТ” (@ChatGPTpp), 6,614 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChatGPTpp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.