Channel
@ChaosAlchemistsLab
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
252subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001797605510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChaosAlchemistsLab |
| Created | Between 1 February 2022 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChaosAlchemistsLab |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 252 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:02 | 253 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:53 | 252 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 251 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 252 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 253 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 253 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
82 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 48.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 28.0% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 2.44% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
And done! I love how the back looks too :3 I'll be using it as one of the patches for a black and white patchwork pants/overall (haven't decided which one yet). I think I'll keep using ton sur ton patches because I love the more subtle texture that it brings, but I'll also experiment with both colours on one to compare
❤2
Tonight's progress! I think it'll take smt like 30min to finish, so I should be done tomorrow :3
❤🔥3
And yesterday's progress! I got almost halfway done with my first thread length estimate so I'm pretty proud :D
❤🔥2❤1
Annnd metallic embroidery is oooooon 😁
❤🔥3
Sashiko prep! This shiny pen really makes me want to buy metallic thread to embroider with, I loooove the effect
❤🔥4❤1👀1
The pineapple's taste barely exists, the milk has soured in texture, but its flavour is still somewhat there and the overall texture is fluffy as hell
I've made the weirdest drink: - Pineapple juice - Coconut milk - Ginger juice - Cinnamon - Cardamom - Red food colouring because why not All blended with ice
❤🔥3
I repotted my parsley and basil! Both really needed deeper pots, especially the parsley :') I hope it'll get back on its roots 🤞🏼🤞🏼
❤4
The flow is so much better than in my old one 🤩🤩 look at all the tiny bubbles!
🥰3❤1
As always the colours really don't do the lamp any justice (it's a gorgeous sunset irl) but after my previous lamp exploded on me I was sure I'd need to buy a whole new one to get it back, but the geniuses at Mathmos sell ALL of the spare parts for ALL of their models since the 60s and so I could get only the bottle and have a functional lamp once again :D
🔥5❤1
Finally finished this bracelet for a friend ! Made it with a yarn gifted by a dyer I ordered from that was not my colour scheme but absolutely theirs :D It's the same pattern that I used for the green headband :3
🥰4❤3
I made a giant kanban board on my wall to keep track of my craft projects :3 On the upper left is stuff to start, lower left are ideas to refine, upper middle is WiP, lower middle left is stuck on a step, lower middle right is missing supplies and right is done! I hope it'll help!
❤🔥5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ChaosAlchemistsLab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chaos Alchemist's Lab” (@ChaosAlchemistsLab), 252 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChaosAlchemistsLab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.