Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Chantelle Baker

@ChantelleBaker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,794subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435300477
TypeChannel
Username@ChantelleBaker
Created27 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChantelleBaker

Growth

3,7943,8163,8057 August 2026 — 3,816 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,816 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,803 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,794 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,791–3,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:483,794-9
11 Aug 2026, 02:073,803-13
7 Aug 2026, 16:533,816no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:013,816first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 11 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 41s
Average length
3m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,832 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,04056.8%
👍62234.0%
💯422.29%
👏311.69%
🥰291.58%
😢191.04%
🤣130.71%
👎110.6%
🤨60.328%
🙏50.273%
💔30.164%
😁30.164%
❤‍🔥20.109%
💩20.109%
🔥20.109%
💊10.055%
😱10.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,832reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2023 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,310 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I haven't accessed or posted in Telegram in years but have been made aware that someone is messaging people pretending to be me and scamming. I would NEVER dm you, particularly not a link. Don't send people money online or click odd links. Block anyone who tries to 'friend' you with a profile that looks like mine - they take my images and pretend to be me. Its been happening for years across other channels. Stay safe

👍5935🔥2🥰2😁1

26 Feb 2024, 22:11 UTC≈10,000 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢19👍13🤣1312🤨6👏2🥰1😱1

9 Feb 2024, 09:15 UTC≈11,600 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026

What can New Zealanders do if we are pushed towards any type of war? Advocate for funding of protection of our seas. I spoke with Kiwi military vets a while ago and they are in agreement that our seas are our most valuable asset in terms of protection yet we have invested barely anything into our submarine capabilities. This would be a very advantageous area for us to invest in given that we do not have the populatio

32👍22👏1

9 Feb 2024, 09:12 UTC≈9,610 views79 reactionsread 8 August 2026

When we were in Ukraine I so badly wanted to go to Russia afterwards however we didn’t have the resources available to us for any remote guarantee of protection over there or a guarantee of our (at the time) Labour Govt causing issues for us trying to get back home. It’s a shame as it would be fascinating to have done street interviews there. The Ukrainians were very forthright with many disagreeing with Zelenskys ha

46👍32👏1

9 Feb 2024, 00:32 UTC≈8,090 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍4612

9 Feb 2024, 00:31 UTC≈6,240 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Watch the full Tucker Carlson / Putin interview here: https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/

10

6 Feb 2024, 01:57 UTC≈6,960 views214 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

173👍34👏5👎2

10 Jan 2024, 04:30 UTC≈8,450 views285 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍201💯4129👏11💔3

19 Dec 2023, 08:50 UTC≈11,000 views477 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Our gorgeous boy was born on the 18th November 2023. We’ve decided to keep the rest of his details offline to protect his privacy. I was terrified to give birth, perhaps I unwittingly willed it into being because nearly everything that could go wrong, did! Diagnosed with preeclampsia we tried waiting to go into labour naturally but ended up booking an induction at 41 weeks after 10 days of endless hospital visits an

412👍34🥰17👏7🙏5❤‍🔥2

19 Dec 2023, 08:50 UTC≈7,560 views189 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

176🥰9👍4

2 Dec 2023, 10:00 UTC≈9,060 views102 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I’m not going to comment any more on this situation as I am currently busy with our wee newborn however I will say that there are conclusions leapt to that the raw data does not support. You are all critical thinkers and I’m sure that any of you with a background in data analysis will easily see the same variables that I did. All the best and have a great weekend. Chantelle

71👍27👎4

2 Dec 2023, 09:35 UTC≈9,650 views76 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Unfortunately if things are released without the proper due diligence it can often be more harmful then beneficial especially if claims are made that the raw data does not support. We have all worked for years to shed light on this tough situation here in NZ and accuracy is of the utmost importance.

👍4916👎5💩2😁2💊1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ChantelleBaker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,314,017 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chantelle Baker” (@ChantelleBaker), 3,794 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChantelleBaker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.