این پست مرتبط با سوال شماست🌹
❤3
Signed Sara Hojjatnia

Channel
@ChakavakAnon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003900527629 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChakavakAnon |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChakavakAnon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 76 | +2 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 04:22 | 74 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 September 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 522 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
16 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 81.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این پست مرتبط با سوال شماست🌹
❤3
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
https://t.me/Chakavakk_Officiall/569
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
درود ایشون باید به حریم شما و نظرتون احترام بزاره با تهدید کردن به رفتن ارتباط رو از حالت امن خارج میکنه اگه به این دلیل میخواد بره خب بره روان خودتو و احترام به خودتو اولویت قرار بده.
👏2👍1
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
سلام سارا خوبی میگم من دوست پسرم با درخواست هاش منو تحت فشار میزاره و من نمیخوام و راضی نیستم از لحاظ روحی روانی دارم اذیت میشم وقتی نه میشنوه حرف از رفتن و کات کردن میاره وسط به نظرت چکار کنم؟
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
این دو تا سوال خیلی با هم فرق دارن من با ازدواج مشکلی دارم؟ و من با ازدواج با آدم نامناسب مشکل دارم؟ به نظرم قبل از جواب دادن ببین دقیقا از کدوم قسمت ازدواج میترسی از مسئولیت، از دست دادن آزادی، طلاق، انتخاب اشتباه یا خودِ زندگی مشترک. وقتی ترس رو اسمگذاری کنی جواب خیلی واضحتر میشه و بستگی داره به دیدگاهت به ازدواج زندگی دائم در حال حرکته و ما در حال انتخاب و تصمیم گیری برای تصمیم گیری بهتر صد البته که باید فکر ک…
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
من ۲۸ سالمه و همه اطرافیانم دارن ازدواج میکنن خودم هنوز مطمئن نیستم اصلاازدواج میخوام یا نه. گاهی فکر میکنم واقعا دلم نمیخواد گاهی هم میترسم فقط از تعهد میترسم و دارم اسمش رو نخواستن میذارم. چطور بفهمم واقعا ازدواج نمیخوام یا فقط آدم مناسبش رو ندیدم؟
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
قبل از مطرح کردنش از خودت بپرس دونستن جواب چه تغییری در زندگی امروزت ایجاد میکنه اگه موضوع مستقیما به امنیت حقوق یا تصمیم مهمی مربوط نیست شاید لازم نباشه صرفا برای سبک شدن ذهن خودت یه راز قدیمی رو دوباره باز کنی. اگه هم تصمیم گرفتی حرف بزنی درباره چیزی که میدونی صحبت کن نه درباره حدسهایی که ازش ساختی.
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
من یه راز خانوادگی رو اتفاقی فهمیدم که مربوط به سالها قبله و هیچکس نمیدونه من خبر دارم از وقتی فهمیدم رفتارم با یکی از اعضای خانواده عوض شده و هر بار میبینمش به اون موضوع فکر میکنم دلم میخواد ازش بپرسم ولی میترسم کل خانواده به هم بریزه از طرفی هم نمیتونم وانمود کنم چیزی نفهمیدم
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
حس خاص ندارم بهتنهایی نه جواب مثبته نه منفی باید ببینی کنارش احساس امنیت احترام کنجکاوی برای شناخت بیشتر و امکان گفتوگوی راحت داری یا نه ازدواج صرفابر اساس مناسب بودن روی کاغذ تصمیم خوبی برای هیچکس نیست اما انتظار عشق شدید از همون چند گفتوگوی اول هم معیار واقعبینانهای نیست میتونی فرصت بیشتری برای شناخت بیشتر بهش بدی عجله ای نیست که فوری تصمیم گیری کنی.
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
من ۲۳ سالمه و یه خواستگار دارم که از نظر خانوادهام خیلی مناسبه شغل خوب خانواده خوب اخلاقش هم بد نیست مشکل اینه که خودم وقتی باهاش حرف میزنم هیچ حس خاصی ندارم نه اینکه بدم بیاد فقط کاملا خنثیام همه میگن علاقه بعدا به وجود میاد و من موندم آیا دارم زیادی سخت میگیرم یا واقعا نباید وارد این ازدواج بشم؟
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
صمیمیت خانوادگی وقتی سالمه که جای تصمیمگیری شخصی رو نگیره قرار نیست یه شبه همهچیز رو مستقل کنی از تصمیمهای کوچک شروع کن و قبل از پرسیدن نظر اول نظر خودت رو مشخص کن بعد اگه خواستی نظر مادرت رو بشنو ولی تصمیم نهایی رو خودت بگیر ناراحت شدن مادر هم لزوما به معنی اشتباه بودن تصمیم تو نیست در نهایت سعی کن منطقی تصمیم گیری کنی چه نظر خانواده باشه چه نظر شخصی خودت.
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
من با مادرم خیلی صمیمیام ولی چند وقته احساس میکنم هر تصمیمی میخوام بگیرم باید اول نظر اون رو بدونم رشته دانشگاهی کار حتی اینکه با چه آدمهایی رفتوآمد کنم اگه خلاف نظرش عمل کنم چند روز باهام سرد میشه و من آخرش کوتاه میام که ناراحت نباشه الان حس میکنم حتی نمیدونم اگر کسی نظرش رو نپرسه خودم واقعا چی میخوام😢
Signed Sara Hojjatnia
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ChakavakAnon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چکاوک؛ از زبانِ شما” (@ChakavakAnon), 76 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChakavakAnon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.