Channel
@Chainslab_Research
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001719804735 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chainslab_Research |
| Description | An independent R&D firm focus on the digital economy revolution, provide in-depth research, genuine insight and cutting-edge opinions, closing the information gap within Blockchain industry. Group Chat: https://t.me/Chainslab_Discussion |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 15 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chainslab_Research |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 25 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 25 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
20 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 30 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NEW PUBLICATION: 'BeraChain: Zero or Hero?' Some protocols like Solana and Arbitrum thrive, while others like Fantom and Celo collapse. Our latest article discusses the reasons behind these outcomes and introduces BeraChain's new approach. https://research.chainslab.io/liquidity-and-berachain This article examines a number of factors, from essential blockchain metrics like speed and transaction costs to liquidity. …
Signed namanhz
Remember when $SOL was just $8? Our new article 'Solana: Pre-halving Analysis' takes you back to those days and shows how it's making a big comeback. https://research.chainslab.io/pre-halving-solana Think back to those tense moments post-FTX when Solana hit rock bottom. Felt like game over, right? But here it is, Solana, making unexpected moves. We've pieced together this plot twist. In crypto, it's never just abo…
👍2
Signed namanhz
NEW PUBLICATION: "BIG TIME - THE COMEBACK OF GAMEFI?". This comprehensive analysis provides insight into the transition from profit-centric models to sustainable gaming experiences in the GameFi industry.🔻 https://research.chainslab.io/big-time The game presents a sophisticated approach to player engagement and economic balance, significantly diverging from traditional GameFi models. This approach could pave the wa…
Signed namanhz
Wait, what? Chainslab is evolving! Say goodbye to the old and dusty, and hello to our new and sicker Homepage. Take a look: https://chainslab.io What’s changed? 💚 The design is now greener and more modern. 💚 The user experience is cleaner and easier to navigate. 💚 The website now features all of our brainchilds: Chainslab Research, HorusCash, and deFarm. Why the change? Simple. We want to offer you a more user-fri…
🔥1
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
New Publication: 'Manta Network & Layer 2: The Genuine ZK Layer 2.' Our newest article provides an in-depth analysis about Manta Network, formerly a Layer 1 blockchain, is now a player in Ethereum's Layer 2 ecosystem. https://research.chainslab.io/manta-network-layer-2 Manta Network's approach integrates advanced ZKPs, specifically zk-SNARKs, to ensure transactional privacy while maintaining transparency. This tech…
🔥2
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
Q3 2023 was a rollercoaster for crypto, but what really happened? Our Chainslab Quarterly Recap article breaks it down, showing how the market stood against the ups and downs. Discover what has happened and some of our predictions here 🔻 https://research.chainslab.io/q3-2023-recap Our analysis is mostly about the market movements of significant coins such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, explaining the reasons behind the c…
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
Maestro Bots exploited. Hacker already made 239 ETH (~$428k) by dumping several tokens. The team said that only their Router was compromised, and all wallets were safe. They have disabled the bot's trading, and going to refund all the exploited funds. All users are suggested to claim their refund and revoke app approvals to Maestro Bots immediately.
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
Over $100M Liquidated Yesterday Due to Fake News About Bitcoin Spot ETF Approval More than $107 million was liquidated on centralized derivatives exchanges yesterday, as reported by Coinglass.com. This sudden sell-off occurred after the price of $BTC surged towards $30,000. The trigger for this sharp downturn was news published by Cointelegraph and disseminated by several other sources, claiming that the SEC had app…
👍1
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
The SEC has chosen not to appeal a court order requiring a review of Grayscale's application to convert its Bitcoin Trust into a spot Bitcoin ETF. This move significantly boosts the likelihood of SEC approval for spot Bitcoin ETFs, with a 90% probability estimated by market experts. Details. BTC's price jumped on the news, now trading above the 27k level.
👍1
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
Pendle Finance has just reached ATH TVL of $158m but many have no idea what is this project about. Discover how Pendle is reshaping the DeFi landscape, simplifying the complexities of yield farming with Chainslab latest article: https://chainslab.io/pendle-finance-a-yield-derivatives-layer-for-defi
👍3🔥2
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
According to L2Beat, Base network TVL has experienced a remarkable surge, jumping by 25.23% in the past 7 days and reaching an impressive US$550 million. This surge has allowed Base to surpass zkSync Era (which stands at US$405 million) once again. This growth mainly come from the re-minting of native USDC on the network on October 4th, causing USDC to skyrocket by a staggering 470.55% and settling at 159 million. D…
❤2
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
Get ready for a week packed with crucial macroeconomic updates! The United States is set to release significant data, including the September Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) figures. Additionally, the Federal Reserve will unveil the minutes from its September meeting, offering valuable insights into the central bank's decisions. On the other hand, tensions between Israel and Palestine will …
👍2
Signed Taylor | Chainslab
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Chainslab_Research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you think BTC reach $30k before FED rate hike?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 30 January 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 753,337 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chainslab | Research” (@Chainslab_Research), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chainslab_Research.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.