Channel
@Chaethereal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003152150017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chaethereal |
| Description | Handled : @CHAETHEREAL_BOT ♥️ |
| Created | 21 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chaethereal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 6 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 21 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 1 post, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 21.1% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 2 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ COME-CARRYING REMEMBERED LETTER OF FORTHCOMING YEAR. Well-written notch as wintertide comes. Once frost-month filled with bliss, myriad pleasure shall be engraved in perfect moments as sincere warmth seems to touch all soul, letting it to dwell in happiness. And now is the time! Old pages have been wrapped, new pages shall be unlocked. Unfolding the first-top beginning of newfangled journey towards somet…
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ❋•⊱.. (𝘚𝘌𝘙𝘈𝘗𝘏𝘐𝘊 𝘌𝘝𝘌𝘙𝘕𝘌𝘚𝘚) 𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗔𝗡 𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗨𝗣𝗢𝗡 𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗦𝗦𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗘𝗙𝗙𝗟𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘. 𝘈𝘕 𝘌𝘛𝘏𝘌𝘙𝘌𝘈𝘓 𝘗𝘈𝘕𝘛𝘏𝘌𝘈 𝘞𝘏𝘖𝘚𝘌 𝘙𝘌𝘚𝘐𝘋𝘌𝘚 𝘐𝘕 𝘓𝘜𝘚𝘛𝘙𝘈𝘛𝘐𝘖𝘕 ────────────────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ❋•⊱.. 𝟏𝐬𝐭 𝐏𝐚𝐠𝐞, 𝑀𝑦𝑡ℎ 𝑂𝑓 𝐷𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟. Curtain of sweet-toned tunes eternally arouse. ‘Twas permitting eternal placidness to embrace an olympian timelessness. Oh, there! Those miracles begin to blossom. From womb of silent quietness, flower-buds, come t…
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ Morrow hails ‘midst stillness, perennial buds begin to bloom. Summoning all souls lingering inside the luminous gleaming to spread seeds of elation. Where an inflorescence shall to anchor its roots through endlessness, its petals illustrate an enthralling illusion. Entranced in never-ending allure ‘tween virtuous pulchritude. Whence mellifluence echoes, tender sounds touch the corollas as though hallowed …
💘9❤8🍓5❤🔥4🎉4🐳3☃2🦄2
ㅤ QUIET HER DAWNLIGHT PORTRAIT IN SILKS (Leaf, VI.) Even as the frame’s boundaries conclude, essence persists like a diaphanous impression of daylight etched upon recollection. You come to fathom that it is not the photograph that endures, but the sentiment she leaves adrift in the air a rare, uncoerced radiance belonging solely to her. Others may shimmer, but she emanates a quiet luminance. No ostentation. No lacq…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Chaethereal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,130,878 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Chaethereal named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CHAEYEON ETHEREAL.” (@Chaethereal), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chaethereal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.