Channel
@ChStudents_Services
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
302,031subscribers
+636 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002212327664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChStudents_Services |
| Description | البوت هو عمل فردي لا يتبع لأي مؤسسة تعليمية رسمية معرف البوت @FrStudents_Servicesbot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChStudents_Services |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
195,000 average views per post against 302,031 subscribers — an engagement rate of 64.7%. Across the 521 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,020–314,917 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.69% and 11.0%, with a median of 3.93%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 23 of 24 published in the window (0 exact, 23 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 4,493,800 |
| Mature posts only | 64.7% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 302,031 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:ara · 521 channels · p10 0.637% · p25 1.69% · p50 3.93% · p75 11.0% · p90 21.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.808th percentile · 16.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.1% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 302,031 | +78 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 301,953 | +161 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 301,792 | +184 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 301,608 | -382 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 301,990 | +580 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 301,410 | +15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 301,395 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 301,395 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (24 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,703,800 |
| Reactions total | 16,110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
16,110 reactions across 24 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,544 | 46.8% | |
| 👍 | 6,162 | 38.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2,404 | 14.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
السلام عليكم يسعد صباحكم توضيح بخصوص الكود المستخدم في البوت: بالسنوات السابقة ما كان في حاجة لاستخدام الكود، لأن الضغط على البوت كان قليل جداً. لكن اليوم، وبعد ما توسعت الخدمة وصار البوت يخدم طلاب من كل سوريا، اعتمدنا نظام الكود بهدف تنظيم الاستخدام، منع السبام، وتخفيف الضغط على البوت حتى تضل الخدمة مستقرة ومتاحة للجميع. وبالفترة الماضية كان تثبيت الكود لفترة أطول قرار مقصود منّا لتنظيم الضغط ومراقبة آلية الاستخ…
❤288👍70🔥13
عودة تطبيق النتائج للعمل بدون أي مشاكل ✅ وكذلك بوت الخدمات الطلابية ✅ https://t.me/FrStudents_ServicesBot
❤257👍169🔥101
⚠️ عطل مؤقت في تطبيق النتائج
👍377❤145🔥86
🔔 عادت ميزة الكشف التلقائي عن النتائج! طلاب التعليم الأساسي(التاسع)، فيكم من الان تحجزوا مسبقاً وتسجّلوا رقم الاكتتاب داخل البوت. 📬 أول ما تصدر النتائج رسمياً، البوت بيبحث عن نتيجتك تلقائياً وبيبعتلك إشعار بالنتيجة مباشرة. يعني ما في داعي تضل تحدّث المواقع أو تبحث كل شوي… سجّل رقم اكتتابك من الان، والبوت بيتولى الباقي وقت صدور النتائج. 🤖 فعّل الكشف التلقائي واحجز مسبقاً: https://t.me/FrStudents_ServicesBot
❤250🔥32
خلصت البكالوريا وما بتعرف من وين تبلش؟ نزّلنا ريل قصير بيمشي معك خطوة بخطوة: من وين تبلش، شو خياراتك، وشو الأخطاء اللي بتوقع فيها أغلب الطلاب. شوفه هون: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dbymd7MzoKb وإذا بتعرف طالب محتار، ابعتله ياه
❤109🔥18👍6
100 ألف متابع. 🤍📱 كل رقم وراه شخص منحني ثقته، وهالثقة بالنسبة إلي أكبر من أي إنجاز. شكراً لكل شخص كان جزء من هالرحلة، ووعد مني أضل قدّم محتوى يليق فيكم ويكون عند حسن ظنكم. البداية كانت معكم… والقادم بإذن الله أجمل. 🚀 https://www.instagram.com/p/DbqkwaozPgQ
❤350👍74🔥36
معلومة هامة‼️ بإمكانكم الاستعلام عن نتائجكم مباشرةً عبر البوت باستخدام رقم الاكتتاب فقط، دون الحاجة إلى كود. 📄✨ أما الاستعلام باستخدام الاسم الكامل ، فما زال يتطلب كود. https://t.me/FrStudents_Servicesbot
❤298👍156🔥87
منشور جديد وكود جديد 🥳 حط لايك ❤️ عمنشور الانستا واترك تعليق "نتيجة" ليوصلك الكود الجديد وتستعلم عن نتيجتك مباشرة عن طريق الاسم او الرقم متل ماوضحتلك بالمنشور https://www.instagram.com/p/Dbmhv5wjP-A/
❤319👍140🔥25
ماتناموا 👀 جماعة الايفون
❤141👍48🔥38
أبناءنا الطلبة، لمن واجه مشاكل بالنسخة الأولى من تطبيق النتائج الامتحانية، نرفق لكم نسخة أخرى من تطبيق النتائج، لتحميله من خلال الرابط : https://apk.edu-access.net/moed.exam_directorate.apk #الجمهورية_العربية_السورية #وزارة_التربية_والتعليم
❤159👍41🔥30
المشكلة بسيرفر الوزارة 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️ شو هالسيرفر والله عيب
👍1,940❤475🔥372
دقايق بس
👍971❤458🔥293
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ChStudents_Services. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الخدمات الطلابية - نتائج شهادة التاسع والبكالوريا بكلوريا” (@ChStudents_Services), 302,031 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChStudents_Services.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.