Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cefion | BotHub | NFT | Gifts

@Cefion

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

111,552subscribers

-1,006 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001763556997
TypeChannel
Username@Cefion
DescriptionWelcome to BotHub We cover social media, marketing, and all things digital. Plus, meet our bots: 👉 @app_kinobot 👉 @Save_Bebot 👉 @StarKeeper_bot (soon) 👉 @Spy_Bebot (soon) Our community: @Cefion_community CEO - @no_name_c3po
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cefion

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

111,552112,558112,0557 August 2026 — 112,558 subscribers7 August 2026 — 112,558 subscribers8 August 2026 — 112,395 subscribers9 August 2026 — 111,983 subscribers10 August 2026 — 111,800 subscribers11 August 2026 — 111,644 subscribers12 August 2026 — 111,552 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -1,006. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111,401–112,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:28111,552-92
11 Aug 2026, 20:44111,644-156
10 Aug 2026, 18:27111,800-183
9 Aug 2026, 19:01111,983-412
8 Aug 2026, 17:37112,395-163
7 Aug 2026, 15:15112,558no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:02112,558first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
87
Videos
18
Links
144

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,021 reactions across 15 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
59314.7%
👍51112.7%
🔥47311.8%
💯45311.3%
🥰44911.2%
🤩3969.85%
🎉3739.28%
❤‍🔥3137.78%
😍3107.71%
😭631.57%
🖕270.671%
💔140.348%
🤣140.348%
😢60.149%
🤮50.124%
👎40.099%
🍓30.075%
🆒20.05%
🐳20.05%
👏20.05%
6 further kinds80.199%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,021reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,311
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 15 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
710
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Cefion. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 February 2026 to 6 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,760 views293 reactions61 Starsread 12 August 2026

Всем привет. Как у вас дела?

💯53🎉38🤩37🔥32❤‍🔥29👍2927😍23

6 Apr 2026, 17:45 UTC≈25,100 views270 reactions151 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

43🎉39👍32💯29🔥28🥰28😍23🤩20

4 Apr 2026, 12:58 UTC≈24,000 views194 reactions109 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

ПЕРЕВОД ИЗОБРАЖЕНИЙ В TELEGRAM! 😮 🧠 Энтузиасты разработали концепт, позволяющий переводить текст с изображений с помощью нового искусственного интеллекта Cocoon.

34💯27👍25🤩20🥰19😍19❤‍🔥18🎉18

3 Apr 2026, 20:10 UTC≈23,300 views197 reactions76 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Телеграм теперь подсвечивает собеседников с другими клиентами. Вот и первая новость😂🙈

🥰3529🤩26🎉21😍20💯19👍18❤‍🔥16

3 Apr 2026, 19:48 UTC≈22,500 views283 reactions138 Starsread 12 August 2026

Мы долго отсутствовали, но теперь восстанавливаем работу. Впереди больше новостей, конкурсов и розыгрышей 😊

🥰43🔥40💯33❤‍🔥30🎉30👍2927🤩27

3 Apr 2026, 19:45 UTC≈40,200 views371 reactions49 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍6652🔥44💯40🤩40🎉34❤‍🔥33😍31

10 Mar 2026, 13:25 UTC≈24,700 views308 reactions82 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉4441👍34🤩32😍32💯31🔥29🥰27

7 Mar 2026, 13:22 UTC≈27,700 views380 reactions276 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

88❤‍🔥48💯41🔥38👍37😍36🎉32🤩31

2 Mar 2026, 21:01 UTC≈22,200 views280 reactions710 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🥰4942❤‍🔥36👍29🔥25😍25🤩24🎉23

28 Feb 2026, 12:15 UTC≈21,800 views220 reactions138 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉38👍27❤‍🔥23🥰21💯20😍20😭19🤩18

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cefion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 490,633 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cefion | BotHub | NFT | Gifts” (@Cefion), 111,552 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cefion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.