Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cate Calls | Future Millionaires

@CateCalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653348074
TypeChannel
Username@CateCalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CateCalls

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:0113no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:2413first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Links
50

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375.0%
😭125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2025 to 23 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2025, 17:14 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026

Aped $阴阳猫 Yin Yang Cat on BSC https://x.com/binance/status/2003495927391170968 0x4aa5e88dd0c3d686651341dac9dd7cdbf6214444

10 Oct 2025, 22:21 UTC65 viewsread 12 August 2026

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE IF YOU LOST A SIGNIFNCANT AMOUNT HERE, DO NOT REVENGE TRADE IT, DO NOT THINK YOU ARE ABLE TO JUST "LONG A BOTTOM", DO NOT THINK YOU ARE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING. I HAVE BLOWN UP BEFORE YEARS AGO AND I WISH SOMEONE KEPT ME FROM TRADING. YES COINS PROBABLY GO UP FROM HERE, YES YOU WILL LOSE "POTENTIAL PROFITS", BUT RECOVERING WHAT YOU LOST WITH WHAT YOU HAVE VS RECOVERING WHAT YOU LOST WITH WHAT YOU HAV

7 Oct 2025, 09:47 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Touched over a milly and now back to our entry

1

6 Oct 2025, 23:52 UTC48 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Aped the dip here. Narrative too strong 100¥ https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x59bb950f46b81563a0841a1755bd255631544f74

2 Oct 2025, 20:51 UTC343 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#10X 🥳 14M to 140M. Did you hold anon?

1

1 Oct 2025, 22:26 UTC31 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Big LP, even bigger potential ~ 14M mcap 0xF3c35A84EF311C847CE4da33C3C31c57770B3760

23 Sept 2025, 19:17 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026

First token on some launchpad Fees goes directly to CZ’s public wallet https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xf28a041ad23f6b3f6c1203f3566224474541296c

23 Sept 2025, 14:56 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

Gambled here https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xb0891651638e6d7F405501bA69f1D9b22978A683

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CateCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cate Calls | Future Millionaires” (@CateCalls), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CateCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.