Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
52 measurements spanning 80 days, net +9,435. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,536–35,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 09:36
34,386
+72
7 Nov 2026, 07:19
34,314
+71
6 Nov 2026, 09:37
34,243
+30
5 Nov 2026, 10:16
34,213
+15
4 Nov 2026, 08:41
34,198
+70
3 Nov 2026, 07:48
34,128
+6
2 Nov 2026, 10:17
34,122
+98
1 Nov 2026, 12:07
34,024
+39
31 Oct 2026, 12:50
33,985
+48
30 Oct 2026, 15:34
33,937
+62
29 Oct 2026, 15:31
33,875
+111
28 Oct 2026, 17:07
33,764
+67
27 Oct 2026, 18:01
33,697
+6
26 Oct 2026, 20:00
33,691
-123
25 Oct 2026, 22:30
33,814
+67
25 Oct 2026, 01:57
33,747
+33
24 Oct 2026, 00:51
33,714
+127
23 Oct 2026, 02:00
33,587
+109
21 Oct 2026, 22:58
33,478
+179
20 Oct 2026, 16:30
33,299
first reading
Engagement
120 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.65%
avg views ÷ 34,386 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,320
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.569%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 120 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
120 (3 January 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
175,937
Reactions total
957
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 06:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
15
Videos
4
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 23s
Average length
1m 42s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,589 reactions across 110 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,932
42.1%
👍
316
6.89%
😍
288
6.28%
🔥
274
5.97%
🤣
246
5.36%
🤩
202
4.40%
🥰
202
4.40%
👎
201
4.38%
🤯
195
4.25%
🆒
172
3.75%
😁
153
3.33%
😢
148
3.23%
👏
93
2.03%
👀
89
1.94%
🫡
46
1.00%
👌
15
0.327%
🙏
10
0.218%
😎
7
0.153%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,589 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,015
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 119 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1,000
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Catcher_Cct_News. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 120 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 January 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 53 posts held from the last 30 days (11.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
کچر پلیرای عزیز، شب بارونیتون بخیر ☔️
یه تغییر کوچیک برای انتقال CCT ها توی وب اپ در نظر گرفتیم که میخوایم باهاتون در میون بذاریم☔️
قراره یه مالیات ۵ درصدی برای هر انتقالی که انجام میدید برداشت بشه از اون مقدار
(برای مثال اگر شما 1k cct انتقال بدین 50 تا از اون حذف میشه و فقط 950 تا به طرف مقابل ارسال میشه و زمانی که مقدار cct مثل قبل کم بشه و قیمت ها درست بشه این مالیات برداشته میشه)
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
دلیلش هم اینه …
کاراکتر مورد نظر خودتون را با ارسال عکس و اسم کاراکتر به صورت درست زیرش بنویسین و در کامنت های این پست ارسال کنید
Submit your chosen character by posting a photo of them, along with their name written correctly underneath, in the comments section of this post.
သင်နှစ်သက်သော ဇာတ်ကောင်၏ ပုံနှင့် အမည်ကို မှန်ကန်စွာ ရေးသားပြီး ဤပို့စ်၏ မှတ်ချက်များတွင် တင်ပေးပါ။
دوستان عزیز، شبتون بخیر🍷
یه نکته مهم رو باید دوباره یادآوری کنیم
🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷
گرونفروشی نه داخل گپ اصلی و نه توی هیچ گپ دیگهای قانونی نیست
فقط و فقط از لیست خود ربات قیمت بدید برای فروش
🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷
قیمتهای نجومی بالای ۳۰ هزار CCT اخطار و بن داره
🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷
پس لطفاً حواستون باشه که قیمتها رو از خود ربات بردارید و از این حد بالاتر نرید🍷
که آخرش مجبور نشیم کسی رو بنگ کنیم🍷
اگر میخواید گرونتر بفروشید، فقط داخل وباپ بخش مزا…
کچر پلیرای عزیز
هرکس که پول رو واریز کرده، لطفاً این کار رو انجام بده:
راشد (مالک) رو همراه با کد کاراکتر تگ کنه تا کارت رو دریافت کنه
عدد کامنتی که گذاشتید رو ادیت کنید و درستش کنید
و دو خط پایین همون پیام تگتون، شمارهٔ پیامتون رو بنویسید که کامنت چندم بودید
ممنون از همکاریتون
---
ချစ်ရတဲ့ ကက်ချာပလေယာတွေ မင်္ဂလာညပါ
ငွေလွှဲပြီးသားသူတိုင်း ဒီလိုလုပ်ပေးပါ:
Rashxdl (ပိုင်ရှင်) ကို Character ကုဒ်နဲ့အတူ Tag လု…
Bleach
1694: Yoruichi Shihouin [⛩]
(🪞 𝙍𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙏𝙔: Supreme)
⛩𝑺𝒉𝒐𝒈𝒖𝒏⛩
price : 1.35 gram(ton)
comment limit: 14
Please drop a comment to buy—for example, 1, 2, 3, and so on.
Naruto/Boruto
41: Itachi Uchiha [⛩]
(🪞 𝙍𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙏𝙔: Supreme)
⛩𝑺𝒉𝒐𝒈𝒖𝒏⛩
price : 1.35 gram(ton)
comment limit: 14
Please drop a comment to buy—for example, 1, 2, 3, and so on.
Chainsaw man
6055: yoru [⛩]
(🪞 𝙍𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙏𝙔: Supreme)
⛩𝑺𝒉𝒐𝒈𝒖𝒏⛩
price : 1.35 gram(ton)
comment limit: 14
Please drop a comment to buy—for example, 1, 2, 3, and so on.
One piece
1890: Monkey D. Luffy [⛩]
(🪞 𝙍𝘼𝙍𝙄𝙏𝙔: Supreme)
⛩𝑺𝒉𝒐𝒈𝒖𝒏⛩
price : 1.35 gram(ton)
comment limit: 13
Please drop a comment to buy—for example, 1, 2, 3, and so on.
Alright friends, let's review the rules:
For purchases, only leave a comment with a number. For example, if 2 people have already commented before you, you should write 3.
Under no circumstances should you leave a comment or reply to anyone else's comment if you do not intend to buy.
After commenting, please wait until I message you in private (DM) for the payment process. Do not message me first.
If you notice t…
❤18😎3🤯1
Signed Rashxdl
Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @Catcher_Cct_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Catcher_Cct_News edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @Catcher_Cct_News as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کسانی که اسکم کردن از بنگ در بیان؟
Anyone who scammed should leave Bang?
اره / yes29%
نه / no71%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Catcher & CCT News” (@Catcher_Cct_News), 34,386 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Catcher_Cct_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.