Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Закрыт||𝐁𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐘 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐂𝐇. 𝙇𝙤𝙧𝙙 𝙅𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙧. #𝙘𝙖𝙨

@CasCrouch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

71subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003859877828
TypeChannel
Username@CasCrouch
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CasCrouch

Growth

7110 Aug 2026, 16:16 — 71 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:51 — 71 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 16:1610 Aug 2026, 23:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–72 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:5171no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:1671first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.0%
avg views ÷ 71 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.4
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held11 (16 July 202617 July 2026)
Views total724
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊2139.6%
👀1426.4%
🌚1222.6%
🆒611.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC78 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«И все же, давайте будем откровенны: для автора жизненно важно осознавать, что его голос услышан. Получать обратную связь, чувствовать живой интерес к своим рукописям и видеть, как рожденные в тишине мысли находят приют в сознании читателя — это та необходимая энергия, которая превращает ремесло в настоящее искусство. Без этого обмена творчество неизбежно превращается в одинокое блуждание по лабиринтам собственной ду

🌚7🕊7👀6🆒1

17 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC83 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

──────────────────────── 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐝𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐨 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐨. Фотографии сделанные в период, в который я бы не хотел возвращаться.

👀5🕊5🆒4🌚2

17 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC75 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❆ 𝒀𝑼𝑳𝑬𝑻𝑰𝑫𝑬 𝑩𝑨𝑳𝑳 𝑨𝑻 𝑯𝑶𝑮𝑾𝑨𝑹𝑻𝑺. «Он снова посмотрел в окно. Отражения не было. Только бездонная тьма, в которой плыла холодная луна.» — 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞, 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐮𝐧𝐭 𝐦𝐞. 𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐢𝐭? 𝐈 𝐝𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐭 𝐢𝐭. 𝐖𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐞𝐭 𝐦𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥? 𝐍𝐨? 𝐀𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐳𝐞? 𝐘𝐨𝐮'𝐫𝐞 𝐤𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐞.. 𝐎𝐤𝐚𝐲, 𝐈 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐭, 𝐈'𝐦 𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐲. ────────────────────────── #post #plot

🕊4🌚3👀3🆒1

16 Jul 2026, 18:25 UTCviews —

Закрыт||𝐁𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐘 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐂𝐇. 𝙇𝙤𝙧𝙙 𝙅𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙧. #𝙘𝙖𝙨 pinned «Оповещу вас в курс дела. Я закрылся к чертям собачьим. Окончательно. Меропа заморожена на неопределённый срок. Дин продлевает свою актуальность, посты выходят около трёх раз в неделю.»

16 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC70 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Оповещу вас в курс дела. Я закрылся к чертям собачьим. Окончательно. Меропа заморожена на неопределённый срок. Дин продлевает свою актуальность, посты выходят около трёх раз в неделю.

🕊5

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @CasCrouch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 850,918 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Закрыт||𝐁𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐘 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐂𝐇. 𝙇𝙤𝙧𝙙 𝙅𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙧. #𝙘𝙖𝙨” (@CasCrouch), 71 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CasCrouch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.