Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Captain America 🇺🇲

Channel

Captain America 🇺🇲

@Captain_America_News

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,075subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002457810973
TypeChannel
Username@Captain_America_News
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Captain_America_News

Growth

2,0322,0752,053.56 August 2026 — 2,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,033 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,059 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,051 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,075 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,026–2,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:282,075+24
12 Aug 2026, 12:572,051-8
9 Aug 2026, 23:412,059+26
6 Aug 2026, 18:532,033+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:212,032no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:232,032first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
436.7%
avg views ÷ 2,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,060
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.152%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (22 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total36,250
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 22s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

276 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕5519.9%
🤣4717.0%
3613.0%
🤡3512.7%
👏3010.9%
🤮186.52%
👍124.35%
🔥103.62%
😁82.90%
🤬51.81%
👎31.09%
👻31.09%
💩31.09%
🍾20.725%
💯20.725%
😎20.725%
😭20.725%
🥱20.725%
🙏10.362%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈6,960 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇭 President Trump says he could reduce Switzerland from an elite nation to a non-elite country with a single stroke of the pen. @Captain_America_News

🤡92🖕1

7 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈7,280 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump openly admitted on camera that Republicans are on track to never win a US president again: “And I'll tell you what, if they get in, I may be the last Republican president. If they don't get smart, if the Senate doesn't get smart, I may be the last Republican president.” @Captain_America_News

5🤮3🤡2

6 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC≈9,810 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

JUST IN: 🇺🇸President Trump: I think we are the only country, period, that does birthright citizenship. We are ending it. @Captain_America_News

😁8🖕4🤣32💩1🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈12,200 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Kamala Harris endorses Abdul El-Sayed for the U.S. Senate in Michigan in new joint fundraising email. @Captain_America_News

🤡85🤮1

6 Jul 2026, 19:12 UTC≈19,500 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Trump: "I didn't know what the hell a red card was. When I found out, I said, 'You gotta be kidding!'" @Captain_America_News

🖕12🤣52👻2

6 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC≈16,500 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Trump on USA-Belgium: "If they beat us, they can be really proud. The other way, if they beat us, we'll say -- I say it was rigged, just like the election was rigged in 2020, but I won't get into that." @Captain_America_News

🤡12🤣51

3 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC≈2,920 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: President Trump allegedly weighing clemency for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs, per CBS. @Captain_America_News

🖕15🤣7🤬31👻1

1 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC≈2,800 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Stephen Miller on birthright citizenship: “If you believe a child born to a foreign mother flying over US airspace is an automatic American then you do not believe in citizenship.” @Captain_America_News

🖕14🤣7👍32💯2👏1

1 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC≈17,500 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Trump disclosed earning more than $1 billion from crypto ventures in 2025, This includes $635 million from $TRUMP meme coin licensing and over $500 million from World Liberty Financial token sales. @Captain_America_News

🤮12👍2💩2😎2🤣1

1 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,810 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices John Roberts (Bush) and Amy Coney Barrett (Trump) both rule against President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order. @Captain_America_News

👏13🤮2🤣1🙏1

1 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,610 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NEW: Tom Homan says immigration enforcement will surge following the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling. @Captain_America_News

🖕9👍5🤡3

30 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC≈16,500 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship. Chief Justice Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, and Jackson all voted to uphold, with Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissenting and Kavanaugh in part. @Captain_America_News

👏102🍾2🤬2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Captain_America_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 54,720 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Captain America 🇺🇲” (@Captain_America_News), 2,075 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Captain_America_News.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.